Cargando…

A Preliminary Study for Reference RF Coil at 11.7 T MRI: Based on Electromagnetic Field Simulation of Hybrid-BC RF Coil According to Diameter and Length at 3.0, 7.0 and 11.7 T

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems must undergo quantitative evaluation through daily and periodic performance assessments. In general, the reference or standard radiofrequency (RF) coils for these performance assessments of 1.5 to 7.0 T MRI systems have been low-pass-type birdcage (LP-BC) RF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Jeung-Hoon, Chung, Jun-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041512
Descripción
Sumario:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems must undergo quantitative evaluation through daily and periodic performance assessments. In general, the reference or standard radiofrequency (RF) coils for these performance assessments of 1.5 to 7.0 T MRI systems have been low-pass-type birdcage (LP-BC) RF coils. However, LP-BC RF coils are inappropriate for use as reference RF coils because of their relatively lower magnetic field (B(1)-field) sensitivity than other types of BC RF coils, especially in ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI systems above 3.0 T. Herein, we propose a hybrid-type BC (Hybrid-BC) RF coil as a reference RF coil with improved B(1)-field sensitivity in UHF MRI system and applied it to an 11.7 T MRI system. An electromagnetic field (EM-field) analysis on the Hybrid-BC RF coil was performed to provide the proper dimensions for its use as a reference RF coil. Commercial finite difference time-domain program was used in EM-field simulation, and home-made analysis programs were used in analysis. The optimal specifications of the proposed Hybrid-BC RF coils for them to qualify as reference RF coils are proposed based on their B(1)(+)-field sensitivity under unnormalized conditions, as well as by considering their B(1)(+)-field uniformity and RF safety under normalized conditions.