Cargando…

Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yuxuan, Weeden, Claire, Patten, Lauren, Dowsey, Michelle, Bunzli, Samantha, Choong, Peter, Schilling, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0
_version_ 1784658177702232064
author Zhou, Yuxuan
Weeden, Claire
Patten, Lauren
Dowsey, Michelle
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter
Schilling, Chris
author_facet Zhou, Yuxuan
Weeden, Claire
Patten, Lauren
Dowsey, Michelle
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter
Schilling, Chris
author_sort Zhou, Yuxuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic Tool for Total Knee Arthroplasty) to predict patient improvement after TKA. The tool aims to be used by the patient without clinician input and does not require clinical data such as X-ray findings or blood results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the SMART Choice tool on patient decision making, particularly willingness for surgery. We hypothesise that the use of the SMART Choice tool will influence willingness to undergo surgery, especially when used earlier in the patient TKA journey. METHODS: This is a multicentred, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited from the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne (SVHM) Orthopaedic Clinic, and the client base of HCF, Australia (private health insurance company). Patients over 45 years of age who have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and considering TKA are eligible for participation. Participants will be randomised to either use the SMART Choice tool or treatment as usual. The SMART Choice tool provides users with a prediction for improvement or deterioration / no change after surgery based on utility score change calculated from the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR-12) survey. The primary outcome of the study is patient willingness for TKA surgery. The secondary outcomes include evaluating the optimal timing for tool use and using decision quality questionnaires to understand the patient experience when using the tool. Participants will be followed up for 6 months from the time of recruitment. DISCUSSION: The SMART Choice tool has the potential to improve patient decision making for TKA. Although many prognostic tools have been developed for other areas of surgery, most are confined within academic bodies of work. This study will be one of the first to evaluate the impact of a prognostic tool on patient decision making using a prospective clinical trial, an important step in transitioning the tool for use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12622000072718. Prospectively registered – 21 January 2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88764492022-02-28 Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Zhou, Yuxuan Weeden, Claire Patten, Lauren Dowsey, Michelle Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter Schilling, Chris BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic Tool for Total Knee Arthroplasty) to predict patient improvement after TKA. The tool aims to be used by the patient without clinician input and does not require clinical data such as X-ray findings or blood results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the SMART Choice tool on patient decision making, particularly willingness for surgery. We hypothesise that the use of the SMART Choice tool will influence willingness to undergo surgery, especially when used earlier in the patient TKA journey. METHODS: This is a multicentred, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited from the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne (SVHM) Orthopaedic Clinic, and the client base of HCF, Australia (private health insurance company). Patients over 45 years of age who have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and considering TKA are eligible for participation. Participants will be randomised to either use the SMART Choice tool or treatment as usual. The SMART Choice tool provides users with a prediction for improvement or deterioration / no change after surgery based on utility score change calculated from the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR-12) survey. The primary outcome of the study is patient willingness for TKA surgery. The secondary outcomes include evaluating the optimal timing for tool use and using decision quality questionnaires to understand the patient experience when using the tool. Participants will be followed up for 6 months from the time of recruitment. DISCUSSION: The SMART Choice tool has the potential to improve patient decision making for TKA. Although many prognostic tools have been developed for other areas of surgery, most are confined within academic bodies of work. This study will be one of the first to evaluate the impact of a prognostic tool on patient decision making using a prospective clinical trial, an important step in transitioning the tool for use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12622000072718. Prospectively registered – 21 January 2022. BioMed Central 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8876449/ /pubmed/35209877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zhou, Yuxuan
Weeden, Claire
Patten, Lauren
Dowsey, Michelle
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter
Schilling, Chris
Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluating willingness for surgery using the smart choice (knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyuxuan evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weedenclaire evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pattenlauren evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dowseymichelle evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bunzlisamantha evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT choongpeter evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schillingchris evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial