Cargando…
Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0 |
_version_ | 1784658177702232064 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Yuxuan Weeden, Claire Patten, Lauren Dowsey, Michelle Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter Schilling, Chris |
author_facet | Zhou, Yuxuan Weeden, Claire Patten, Lauren Dowsey, Michelle Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter Schilling, Chris |
author_sort | Zhou, Yuxuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic Tool for Total Knee Arthroplasty) to predict patient improvement after TKA. The tool aims to be used by the patient without clinician input and does not require clinical data such as X-ray findings or blood results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the SMART Choice tool on patient decision making, particularly willingness for surgery. We hypothesise that the use of the SMART Choice tool will influence willingness to undergo surgery, especially when used earlier in the patient TKA journey. METHODS: This is a multicentred, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited from the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne (SVHM) Orthopaedic Clinic, and the client base of HCF, Australia (private health insurance company). Patients over 45 years of age who have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and considering TKA are eligible for participation. Participants will be randomised to either use the SMART Choice tool or treatment as usual. The SMART Choice tool provides users with a prediction for improvement or deterioration / no change after surgery based on utility score change calculated from the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR-12) survey. The primary outcome of the study is patient willingness for TKA surgery. The secondary outcomes include evaluating the optimal timing for tool use and using decision quality questionnaires to understand the patient experience when using the tool. Participants will be followed up for 6 months from the time of recruitment. DISCUSSION: The SMART Choice tool has the potential to improve patient decision making for TKA. Although many prognostic tools have been developed for other areas of surgery, most are confined within academic bodies of work. This study will be one of the first to evaluate the impact of a prognostic tool on patient decision making using a prospective clinical trial, an important step in transitioning the tool for use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12622000072718. Prospectively registered – 21 January 2022. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8876449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88764492022-02-28 Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Zhou, Yuxuan Weeden, Claire Patten, Lauren Dowsey, Michelle Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter Schilling, Chris BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic Tool for Total Knee Arthroplasty) to predict patient improvement after TKA. The tool aims to be used by the patient without clinician input and does not require clinical data such as X-ray findings or blood results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the SMART Choice tool on patient decision making, particularly willingness for surgery. We hypothesise that the use of the SMART Choice tool will influence willingness to undergo surgery, especially when used earlier in the patient TKA journey. METHODS: This is a multicentred, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited from the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne (SVHM) Orthopaedic Clinic, and the client base of HCF, Australia (private health insurance company). Patients over 45 years of age who have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and considering TKA are eligible for participation. Participants will be randomised to either use the SMART Choice tool or treatment as usual. The SMART Choice tool provides users with a prediction for improvement or deterioration / no change after surgery based on utility score change calculated from the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR-12) survey. The primary outcome of the study is patient willingness for TKA surgery. The secondary outcomes include evaluating the optimal timing for tool use and using decision quality questionnaires to understand the patient experience when using the tool. Participants will be followed up for 6 months from the time of recruitment. DISCUSSION: The SMART Choice tool has the potential to improve patient decision making for TKA. Although many prognostic tools have been developed for other areas of surgery, most are confined within academic bodies of work. This study will be one of the first to evaluate the impact of a prognostic tool on patient decision making using a prospective clinical trial, an important step in transitioning the tool for use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12622000072718. Prospectively registered – 21 January 2022. BioMed Central 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8876449/ /pubmed/35209877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Zhou, Yuxuan Weeden, Claire Patten, Lauren Dowsey, Michelle Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter Schilling, Chris Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating willingness for surgery using the smart choice (knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouyuxuan evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weedenclaire evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pattenlauren evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dowseymichelle evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bunzlisamantha evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT choongpeter evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schillingchris evaluatingwillingnessforsurgeryusingthesmartchoicekneepatientprognostictoolfortotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial |