Cargando…

The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the axillary recurrence rate and usefulness of axillary ultrasound (AUS) during supplementary whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). METHODS: A retrospective database search identified consecutive asymptomatic women who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Sung Ui, Chang, Jung Min, Park, Jiwon, Lee, Han-Byoel, Han, Wonshik, Moon, Woo Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133092
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e3
_version_ 1784658198456696832
author Shin, Sung Ui
Chang, Jung Min
Park, Jiwon
Lee, Han-Byoel
Han, Wonshik
Moon, Woo Kyung
author_facet Shin, Sung Ui
Chang, Jung Min
Park, Jiwon
Lee, Han-Byoel
Han, Wonshik
Moon, Woo Kyung
author_sort Shin, Sung Ui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the axillary recurrence rate and usefulness of axillary ultrasound (AUS) during supplementary whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). METHODS: A retrospective database search identified consecutive asymptomatic women who underwent postoperative supplemental whole-breast US screening, including that of the bilateral axillae, after negative findings on mammography between January and June 2017. Using the pathologic data or at least 1-year follow-up data as reference standards, the axillary recurrence rate, cancer detection rate (CDR), interval axillary recurrence rate per 1,000 screenings, sensitivity, specificity, and abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) were estimated. RESULTS: From the data of 4,430 women (mean age, 55.0 ± 10.1 years) analyzed in this study, there were five axillary recurrence cases (1.1/1,000) in the median follow-up period of 57.2 months. AUS showed a CDR of 0.2 (1/4,430; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–1.3) and an interval axillary recurrence rate of 0.9 (4/4,402; 95% CI, 0.2–2.3) per 1,000 examinations. The sensitivity and specificity were 20.0% (1/5; 95% CI, 0.5–71.6), and 99.4% (4,398/4,425; 95% CI, 99.1–99.6), respectively, while the AIR was 0.6% (28/4,430; 95% CI, 0.4–0.9%). CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic women with a PHBC and negative findings on mammography, axillary recurrence after breast cancer and axillary treatment was uncommon, and the supplemental AUS screening yielded 0.2 cancers per 1,000 examinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88765392022-03-08 The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer Shin, Sung Ui Chang, Jung Min Park, Jiwon Lee, Han-Byoel Han, Wonshik Moon, Woo Kyung J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the axillary recurrence rate and usefulness of axillary ultrasound (AUS) during supplementary whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). METHODS: A retrospective database search identified consecutive asymptomatic women who underwent postoperative supplemental whole-breast US screening, including that of the bilateral axillae, after negative findings on mammography between January and June 2017. Using the pathologic data or at least 1-year follow-up data as reference standards, the axillary recurrence rate, cancer detection rate (CDR), interval axillary recurrence rate per 1,000 screenings, sensitivity, specificity, and abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) were estimated. RESULTS: From the data of 4,430 women (mean age, 55.0 ± 10.1 years) analyzed in this study, there were five axillary recurrence cases (1.1/1,000) in the median follow-up period of 57.2 months. AUS showed a CDR of 0.2 (1/4,430; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–1.3) and an interval axillary recurrence rate of 0.9 (4/4,402; 95% CI, 0.2–2.3) per 1,000 examinations. The sensitivity and specificity were 20.0% (1/5; 95% CI, 0.5–71.6), and 99.4% (4,398/4,425; 95% CI, 99.1–99.6), respectively, while the AIR was 0.6% (28/4,430; 95% CI, 0.4–0.9%). CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic women with a PHBC and negative findings on mammography, axillary recurrence after breast cancer and axillary treatment was uncommon, and the supplemental AUS screening yielded 0.2 cancers per 1,000 examinations. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8876539/ /pubmed/35133092 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e3 Text en © 2022 Korean Breast Cancer Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Sung Ui
Chang, Jung Min
Park, Jiwon
Lee, Han-Byoel
Han, Wonshik
Moon, Woo Kyung
The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title_full The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title_fullStr The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title_short The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer
title_sort usefulness of ultrasound surveillance for axillary recurrence in women with personal history of breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133092
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e3
work_keys_str_mv AT shinsungui theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT changjungmin theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT parkjiwon theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT leehanbyoel theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT hanwonshik theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT moonwookyung theusefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT shinsungui usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT changjungmin usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT parkjiwon usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT leehanbyoel usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT hanwonshik usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer
AT moonwookyung usefulnessofultrasoundsurveillanceforaxillaryrecurrenceinwomenwithpersonalhistoryofbreastcancer