Cargando…
Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four articles (systematic rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35213097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0808 |
_version_ | 1784658224264249344 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ho Young Suh, Chong Hyun Woo, Sungmin Kim, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Kyung Won |
author_facet | Park, Ho Young Suh, Chong Hyun Woo, Sungmin Kim, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Kyung Won |
author_sort | Park, Ho Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines’ recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. CONCLUSION: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8876652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88766522022-03-09 Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology Park, Ho Young Suh, Chong Hyun Woo, Sungmin Kim, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Kyung Won Korean J Radiol Technology, Experiment, and Physics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines’ recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. CONCLUSION: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication. The Korean Society of Radiology 2022-03 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8876652/ /pubmed/35213097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0808 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technology, Experiment, and Physics Park, Ho Young Suh, Chong Hyun Woo, Sungmin Kim, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Kyung Won Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title | Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title_full | Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title_fullStr | Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title_short | Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology |
title_sort | quality reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis according to prisma 2020 guidelines: results from recently published papers in the korean journal of radiology |
topic | Technology, Experiment, and Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35213097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkhoyoung qualityreportingofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisaccordingtoprisma2020guidelinesresultsfromrecentlypublishedpapersinthekoreanjournalofradiology AT suhchonghyun qualityreportingofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisaccordingtoprisma2020guidelinesresultsfromrecentlypublishedpapersinthekoreanjournalofradiology AT woosungmin qualityreportingofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisaccordingtoprisma2020guidelinesresultsfromrecentlypublishedpapersinthekoreanjournalofradiology AT kimpyeonghwa qualityreportingofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisaccordingtoprisma2020guidelinesresultsfromrecentlypublishedpapersinthekoreanjournalofradiology AT kimkyungwon qualityreportingofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisaccordingtoprisma2020guidelinesresultsfromrecentlypublishedpapersinthekoreanjournalofradiology |