Cargando…

A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca

Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boshra, Marian S., Hussein, Raghda R. S., Mohsen, Marwa, Elberry, Ahmed A., Altyar, Ahmed E., Tammam, Mahmoud, Sarhan, Rania M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292
_version_ 1784658249097674752
author Boshra, Marian S.
Hussein, Raghda R. S.
Mohsen, Marwa
Elberry, Ahmed A.
Altyar, Ahmed E.
Tammam, Mahmoud
Sarhan, Rania M.
author_facet Boshra, Marian S.
Hussein, Raghda R. S.
Mohsen, Marwa
Elberry, Ahmed A.
Altyar, Ahmed E.
Tammam, Mahmoud
Sarhan, Rania M.
author_sort Boshra, Marian S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable evidence on their side effects and complications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in Egypt between 20 September and 10 October in 2021, with multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering all data on vaccine administration confusion, adverse effects or intensity, and complications. Results: Among the 390 participants, 42.3% reported being hesitant before receiving one of the vaccines. About 40.3% of participants were previously infected before getting vaccinated while only 4.6% reported being infected after vaccination. The AstraZeneca vaccine demonstrated higher side effects and symptoms than the Sinopharm vaccine while the Sinopharm vaccine showed a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination. Conclusions: People with higher educational levels and chronic respiratory diseases represent an excellent model for accepting COVID-19 vaccination. A booster shot is recommended for people vaccinated with the Sinopharm vaccine due to a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination; however, the Sinopharm vaccine shows a more acceptable safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88767572022-02-26 A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca Boshra, Marian S. Hussein, Raghda R. S. Mohsen, Marwa Elberry, Ahmed A. Altyar, Ahmed E. Tammam, Mahmoud Sarhan, Rania M. Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable evidence on their side effects and complications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in Egypt between 20 September and 10 October in 2021, with multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering all data on vaccine administration confusion, adverse effects or intensity, and complications. Results: Among the 390 participants, 42.3% reported being hesitant before receiving one of the vaccines. About 40.3% of participants were previously infected before getting vaccinated while only 4.6% reported being infected after vaccination. The AstraZeneca vaccine demonstrated higher side effects and symptoms than the Sinopharm vaccine while the Sinopharm vaccine showed a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination. Conclusions: People with higher educational levels and chronic respiratory diseases represent an excellent model for accepting COVID-19 vaccination. A booster shot is recommended for people vaccinated with the Sinopharm vaccine due to a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination; however, the Sinopharm vaccine shows a more acceptable safety profile. MDPI 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8876757/ /pubmed/35214750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Boshra, Marian S.
Hussein, Raghda R. S.
Mohsen, Marwa
Elberry, Ahmed A.
Altyar, Ahmed E.
Tammam, Mahmoud
Sarhan, Rania M.
A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title_full A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title_fullStr A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title_full_unstemmed A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title_short A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
title_sort battle against covid-19: vaccine hesitancy and awareness with a comparative study between sinopharm and astrazeneca
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292
work_keys_str_mv AT boshramarians abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT husseinraghdars abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT mohsenmarwa abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT elberryahmeda abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT altyarahmede abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT tammammahmoud abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT sarhanraniam abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT boshramarians battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT husseinraghdars battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT mohsenmarwa battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT elberryahmeda battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT altyarahmede battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT tammammahmoud battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca
AT sarhanraniam battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca