Cargando…
A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca
Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable eviden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292 |
_version_ | 1784658249097674752 |
---|---|
author | Boshra, Marian S. Hussein, Raghda R. S. Mohsen, Marwa Elberry, Ahmed A. Altyar, Ahmed E. Tammam, Mahmoud Sarhan, Rania M. |
author_facet | Boshra, Marian S. Hussein, Raghda R. S. Mohsen, Marwa Elberry, Ahmed A. Altyar, Ahmed E. Tammam, Mahmoud Sarhan, Rania M. |
author_sort | Boshra, Marian S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable evidence on their side effects and complications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in Egypt between 20 September and 10 October in 2021, with multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering all data on vaccine administration confusion, adverse effects or intensity, and complications. Results: Among the 390 participants, 42.3% reported being hesitant before receiving one of the vaccines. About 40.3% of participants were previously infected before getting vaccinated while only 4.6% reported being infected after vaccination. The AstraZeneca vaccine demonstrated higher side effects and symptoms than the Sinopharm vaccine while the Sinopharm vaccine showed a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination. Conclusions: People with higher educational levels and chronic respiratory diseases represent an excellent model for accepting COVID-19 vaccination. A booster shot is recommended for people vaccinated with the Sinopharm vaccine due to a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination; however, the Sinopharm vaccine shows a more acceptable safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8876757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88767572022-02-26 A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca Boshra, Marian S. Hussein, Raghda R. S. Mohsen, Marwa Elberry, Ahmed A. Altyar, Ahmed E. Tammam, Mahmoud Sarhan, Rania M. Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: Awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine’s adverse effects is crucial for gaining public trust. As we still lack proof of vaccines’ safety, this survey aimed to investigate Egyptians’ general awareness of the Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines against COVID-19 and provide considerable evidence on their side effects and complications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in Egypt between 20 September and 10 October in 2021, with multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering all data on vaccine administration confusion, adverse effects or intensity, and complications. Results: Among the 390 participants, 42.3% reported being hesitant before receiving one of the vaccines. About 40.3% of participants were previously infected before getting vaccinated while only 4.6% reported being infected after vaccination. The AstraZeneca vaccine demonstrated higher side effects and symptoms than the Sinopharm vaccine while the Sinopharm vaccine showed a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination. Conclusions: People with higher educational levels and chronic respiratory diseases represent an excellent model for accepting COVID-19 vaccination. A booster shot is recommended for people vaccinated with the Sinopharm vaccine due to a significantly higher rate of COVID-19 infection after vaccination; however, the Sinopharm vaccine shows a more acceptable safety profile. MDPI 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8876757/ /pubmed/35214750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boshra, Marian S. Hussein, Raghda R. S. Mohsen, Marwa Elberry, Ahmed A. Altyar, Ahmed E. Tammam, Mahmoud Sarhan, Rania M. A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title | A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title_full | A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title_fullStr | A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title_full_unstemmed | A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title_short | A Battle against COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy and Awareness with a Comparative Study between Sinopharm and AstraZeneca |
title_sort | battle against covid-19: vaccine hesitancy and awareness with a comparative study between sinopharm and astrazeneca |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boshramarians abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT husseinraghdars abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT mohsenmarwa abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT elberryahmeda abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT altyarahmede abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT tammammahmoud abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT sarhanraniam abattleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT boshramarians battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT husseinraghdars battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT mohsenmarwa battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT elberryahmeda battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT altyarahmede battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT tammammahmoud battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca AT sarhanraniam battleagainstcovid19vaccinehesitancyandawarenesswithacomparativestudybetweensinopharmandastrazeneca |