Cargando…

Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarımada, Semir, Barut Selver, Özlem, Palamar, Melis, Eğrilmez, Sait, Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret, Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha, Yağcı, Ayşe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196833
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046
_version_ 1784658254168588288
author Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
Eğrilmez, Sait
Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret
Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha
Yağcı, Ayşe
author_facet Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
Eğrilmez, Sait
Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret
Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha
Yağcı, Ayşe
author_sort Yarımada, Semir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314 patients who were diagnosed with MK in our clinic between 2012 and 2019. RESULTS: Among 314 patients, 142 had positive cultures (45.2%). The mean ages of the culture-positive and -negative patients at the time of diagnosis were 51.39±21.31 (range, 14-90) years and 56.68±21.34 (7-94) years, respectively (p=0.028). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the culture-positive and -negative patients were1.74±1.25 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.91±1.23 (0-3.1) LogMAR prior to treatment and increased to 1.21±1.30 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.27± 1.29 (0-3.1) LogMAR at last visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between culture-positive and -negative patients’ BCVA levels at presentation or last visit. Ninety-two patients (64.7%) were infected with bacteria and 50 patients (35.2%) with fungi. The most common pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.2%) and Fusarium spp. (11.2%). Keratitis foci were either centrally or paracentrally located in 105 eyes (73.9%) of culture-positive patients and 149 eyes (86.6%) of culture-negative patients. Multiple foci were present mostly in culture-positive patients (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the culture-positive and -negative groups in terms of hypopyon presence (p=0.364). The proportion of contact lens (CL) wearers was 33% (n=47) among culturepositive MK patients and 13.3% (n=23) among culture-negative MK patients, respectively (p<0.001). Culture positivity was found to be significantly higher in keratitis associated with CL use (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Microbiological analysis and culture evaluation are important steps in order to manage proper treatment in microbial keratitis. Prognosis mostly depends on the infectivity of the microbiological agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88767792022-03-10 Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Eğrilmez, Sait Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha Yağcı, Ayşe Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314 patients who were diagnosed with MK in our clinic between 2012 and 2019. RESULTS: Among 314 patients, 142 had positive cultures (45.2%). The mean ages of the culture-positive and -negative patients at the time of diagnosis were 51.39±21.31 (range, 14-90) years and 56.68±21.34 (7-94) years, respectively (p=0.028). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the culture-positive and -negative patients were1.74±1.25 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.91±1.23 (0-3.1) LogMAR prior to treatment and increased to 1.21±1.30 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.27± 1.29 (0-3.1) LogMAR at last visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between culture-positive and -negative patients’ BCVA levels at presentation or last visit. Ninety-two patients (64.7%) were infected with bacteria and 50 patients (35.2%) with fungi. The most common pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.2%) and Fusarium spp. (11.2%). Keratitis foci were either centrally or paracentrally located in 105 eyes (73.9%) of culture-positive patients and 149 eyes (86.6%) of culture-negative patients. Multiple foci were present mostly in culture-positive patients (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the culture-positive and -negative groups in terms of hypopyon presence (p=0.364). The proportion of contact lens (CL) wearers was 33% (n=47) among culturepositive MK patients and 13.3% (n=23) among culture-negative MK patients, respectively (p<0.001). Culture positivity was found to be significantly higher in keratitis associated with CL use (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Microbiological analysis and culture evaluation are important steps in order to manage proper treatment in microbial keratitis. Prognosis mostly depends on the infectivity of the microbiological agent. Galenos Publishing 2022-02 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8876779/ /pubmed/35196833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
Eğrilmez, Sait
Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret
Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha
Yağcı, Ayşe
Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title_full Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title_fullStr Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title_short Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
title_sort comparison of culture-positive and -negative microbial keratitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196833
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046
work_keys_str_mv AT yarımadasemir comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT barutselverozlem comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT palamarmelis comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT egrilmezsait comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT aydemirsabiresohret comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT hilmioglupolatsuleyha comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis
AT yagcıayse comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis