Cargando…
Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 |
_version_ | 1784658254168588288 |
---|---|
author | Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Eğrilmez, Sait Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha Yağcı, Ayşe |
author_facet | Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Eğrilmez, Sait Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha Yağcı, Ayşe |
author_sort | Yarımada, Semir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314 patients who were diagnosed with MK in our clinic between 2012 and 2019. RESULTS: Among 314 patients, 142 had positive cultures (45.2%). The mean ages of the culture-positive and -negative patients at the time of diagnosis were 51.39±21.31 (range, 14-90) years and 56.68±21.34 (7-94) years, respectively (p=0.028). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the culture-positive and -negative patients were1.74±1.25 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.91±1.23 (0-3.1) LogMAR prior to treatment and increased to 1.21±1.30 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.27± 1.29 (0-3.1) LogMAR at last visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between culture-positive and -negative patients’ BCVA levels at presentation or last visit. Ninety-two patients (64.7%) were infected with bacteria and 50 patients (35.2%) with fungi. The most common pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.2%) and Fusarium spp. (11.2%). Keratitis foci were either centrally or paracentrally located in 105 eyes (73.9%) of culture-positive patients and 149 eyes (86.6%) of culture-negative patients. Multiple foci were present mostly in culture-positive patients (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the culture-positive and -negative groups in terms of hypopyon presence (p=0.364). The proportion of contact lens (CL) wearers was 33% (n=47) among culturepositive MK patients and 13.3% (n=23) among culture-negative MK patients, respectively (p<0.001). Culture positivity was found to be significantly higher in keratitis associated with CL use (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Microbiological analysis and culture evaluation are important steps in order to manage proper treatment in microbial keratitis. Prognosis mostly depends on the infectivity of the microbiological agent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8876779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88767792022-03-10 Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Eğrilmez, Sait Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha Yağcı, Ayşe Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culturenegative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314 patients who were diagnosed with MK in our clinic between 2012 and 2019. RESULTS: Among 314 patients, 142 had positive cultures (45.2%). The mean ages of the culture-positive and -negative patients at the time of diagnosis were 51.39±21.31 (range, 14-90) years and 56.68±21.34 (7-94) years, respectively (p=0.028). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the culture-positive and -negative patients were1.74±1.25 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.91±1.23 (0-3.1) LogMAR prior to treatment and increased to 1.21±1.30 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.27± 1.29 (0-3.1) LogMAR at last visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between culture-positive and -negative patients’ BCVA levels at presentation or last visit. Ninety-two patients (64.7%) were infected with bacteria and 50 patients (35.2%) with fungi. The most common pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.2%) and Fusarium spp. (11.2%). Keratitis foci were either centrally or paracentrally located in 105 eyes (73.9%) of culture-positive patients and 149 eyes (86.6%) of culture-negative patients. Multiple foci were present mostly in culture-positive patients (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the culture-positive and -negative groups in terms of hypopyon presence (p=0.364). The proportion of contact lens (CL) wearers was 33% (n=47) among culturepositive MK patients and 13.3% (n=23) among culture-negative MK patients, respectively (p<0.001). Culture positivity was found to be significantly higher in keratitis associated with CL use (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Microbiological analysis and culture evaluation are important steps in order to manage proper treatment in microbial keratitis. Prognosis mostly depends on the infectivity of the microbiological agent. Galenos Publishing 2022-02 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8876779/ /pubmed/35196833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Eğrilmez, Sait Aydemir, Sabire Şöhret Hilmioğlu Polat, Süleyha Yağcı, Ayşe Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title_full | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title_short | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis |
title_sort | comparison of culture-positive and -negative microbial keratitis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yarımadasemir comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT barutselverozlem comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT palamarmelis comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT egrilmezsait comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT aydemirsabiresohret comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT hilmioglupolatsuleyha comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis AT yagcıayse comparisonofculturepositiveandnegativemicrobialkeratitis |