Cargando…

Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated acoustic biofeedback training using microperimetry in patients with foveal scars and an eligible retinal locus for better fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The acoustic biofeedback training module in the MAIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe, Turgut Öztürk, Banu, Gönül, Şaban, Bakbak, Berker, Gedik, Şansal, Okudan, Süleyman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196835
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.73368
_version_ 1784658254404517888
author Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe
Turgut Öztürk, Banu
Gönül, Şaban
Bakbak, Berker
Gedik, Şansal
Okudan, Süleyman
author_facet Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe
Turgut Öztürk, Banu
Gönül, Şaban
Bakbak, Berker
Gedik, Şansal
Okudan, Süleyman
author_sort Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated acoustic biofeedback training using microperimetry in patients with foveal scars and an eligible retinal locus for better fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The acoustic biofeedback training module in the MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment, CenterVue®, Italy) microperimeter was used for training. To determine the treatment efficacy, the following variables were compared before and after testing: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); MAIA microperimeter full threshold 4-2 test parameters of average threshold value, fixation parameters P1 and P2, and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 63% and 95% of fixation points; contrast sensitivity (CSV 1000E Contrast Sensitivity Test); reading speed using the Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test (MNREAD reading chart); and quality of life (NEI-VFQ-25). In addition, fixation stability parameters were recorded during each session. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 29 patients with a mean age of 68.72±8.34 years. Median BCVA was initially 0.8 (0.2-1.6) logMAR and was 0.8 (0.1-1.6) logMAR after 8 weeks of preferred retinal locus training (p=0.003). The fixation stability parameter P1 improved from a mean of 21.28±3.08% to 32.69±3.69% (p=0.001) while mean P2 improved from 52.79±4.53% to 68.31±3.89% (p=0.001). Mean BCEA 63% decreased from 16.11±2.27(°2) to 13.34±2.26(°2) (p=0.127) and mean BCEA 95% decreased from 45.87±6.72(°2) to 40.01±6.78(°2) (p=0.247) after training. Binocular reading speed was 38.28±6.25 words per minute (wpm) before training and 45.34±7.35 wpm after training (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvement was observed in contrast sensitivity and quality of life questionnaire scores after training. CONCLUSION: Beginning with the fifth session, biofeedback training for a new trained retinal locus improved average sensitivity, fixation stability, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and quality of life in patients with macular scarring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88767802022-03-10 Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe Turgut Öztürk, Banu Gönül, Şaban Bakbak, Berker Gedik, Şansal Okudan, Süleyman Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated acoustic biofeedback training using microperimetry in patients with foveal scars and an eligible retinal locus for better fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The acoustic biofeedback training module in the MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment, CenterVue®, Italy) microperimeter was used for training. To determine the treatment efficacy, the following variables were compared before and after testing: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); MAIA microperimeter full threshold 4-2 test parameters of average threshold value, fixation parameters P1 and P2, and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 63% and 95% of fixation points; contrast sensitivity (CSV 1000E Contrast Sensitivity Test); reading speed using the Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test (MNREAD reading chart); and quality of life (NEI-VFQ-25). In addition, fixation stability parameters were recorded during each session. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 29 patients with a mean age of 68.72±8.34 years. Median BCVA was initially 0.8 (0.2-1.6) logMAR and was 0.8 (0.1-1.6) logMAR after 8 weeks of preferred retinal locus training (p=0.003). The fixation stability parameter P1 improved from a mean of 21.28±3.08% to 32.69±3.69% (p=0.001) while mean P2 improved from 52.79±4.53% to 68.31±3.89% (p=0.001). Mean BCEA 63% decreased from 16.11±2.27(°2) to 13.34±2.26(°2) (p=0.127) and mean BCEA 95% decreased from 45.87±6.72(°2) to 40.01±6.78(°2) (p=0.247) after training. Binocular reading speed was 38.28±6.25 words per minute (wpm) before training and 45.34±7.35 wpm after training (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvement was observed in contrast sensitivity and quality of life questionnaire scores after training. CONCLUSION: Beginning with the fifth session, biofeedback training for a new trained retinal locus improved average sensitivity, fixation stability, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and quality of life in patients with macular scarring. Galenos Publishing 2022-02 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8876780/ /pubmed/35196835 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.73368 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bozkurt Oflaz, Ayşe
Turgut Öztürk, Banu
Gönül, Şaban
Bakbak, Berker
Gedik, Şansal
Okudan, Süleyman
Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title_full Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title_fullStr Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title_short Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training
title_sort short-term clinical results of preferred retinal locus training
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196835
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.73368
work_keys_str_mv AT bozkurtoflazayse shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining
AT turgutozturkbanu shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining
AT gonulsaban shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining
AT bakbakberker shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining
AT gediksansal shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining
AT okudansuleyman shorttermclinicalresultsofpreferredretinallocustraining