Cargando…

Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures

Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Yao-Tung, Chou, Yu-Ching, Wu, Chia-Chun, Yeh, Tsu-Te
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262
_version_ 1784658274118795264
author Tsai, Yao-Tung
Chou, Yu-Ching
Wu, Chia-Chun
Yeh, Tsu-Te
author_facet Tsai, Yao-Tung
Chou, Yu-Ching
Wu, Chia-Chun
Yeh, Tsu-Te
author_sort Tsai, Yao-Tung
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation (traditional open method, n = 21; minimally invasive technique, n = 17). Intergroup comparisons and statistical analysis were performed for intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative radiographic grading, post-operative functional score, and complication rates. Results: Patients treated with the minimally invasive technique had a significantly shorter operative time (−52 min, p = 0.022), reduced blood loss volume (−287 mL, p < 0.001), and better cosmetic appearance (p < 0.05) than those in the traditional open group. There were no significant intergroup differences in post-operative radiographic grading (p = 0.489) or post-operative functional scores (p = 0.072). The complication rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (1/17 patients) than in the traditional open group (2/21 patients). Conclusions: Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation is a viable treatment for sacral fractures and can reduce blood loss and operative time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8876864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88768642022-02-26 Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures Tsai, Yao-Tung Chou, Yu-Ching Wu, Chia-Chun Yeh, Tsu-Te J Pers Med Article Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation (traditional open method, n = 21; minimally invasive technique, n = 17). Intergroup comparisons and statistical analysis were performed for intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative radiographic grading, post-operative functional score, and complication rates. Results: Patients treated with the minimally invasive technique had a significantly shorter operative time (−52 min, p = 0.022), reduced blood loss volume (−287 mL, p < 0.001), and better cosmetic appearance (p < 0.05) than those in the traditional open group. There were no significant intergroup differences in post-operative radiographic grading (p = 0.489) or post-operative functional scores (p = 0.072). The complication rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (1/17 patients) than in the traditional open group (2/21 patients). Conclusions: Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation is a viable treatment for sacral fractures and can reduce blood loss and operative time. MDPI 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8876864/ /pubmed/35207750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tsai, Yao-Tung
Chou, Yu-Ching
Wu, Chia-Chun
Yeh, Tsu-Te
Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title_full Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title_fullStr Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title_short Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
title_sort traditional versus minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for sacral fracture treatment in vertically unstable pelvic fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaiyaotung traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures
AT chouyuching traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures
AT wuchiachun traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures
AT yehtsute traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures