Cargando…
Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures
Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262 |
_version_ | 1784658274118795264 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Yao-Tung Chou, Yu-Ching Wu, Chia-Chun Yeh, Tsu-Te |
author_facet | Tsai, Yao-Tung Chou, Yu-Ching Wu, Chia-Chun Yeh, Tsu-Te |
author_sort | Tsai, Yao-Tung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation (traditional open method, n = 21; minimally invasive technique, n = 17). Intergroup comparisons and statistical analysis were performed for intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative radiographic grading, post-operative functional score, and complication rates. Results: Patients treated with the minimally invasive technique had a significantly shorter operative time (−52 min, p = 0.022), reduced blood loss volume (−287 mL, p < 0.001), and better cosmetic appearance (p < 0.05) than those in the traditional open group. There were no significant intergroup differences in post-operative radiographic grading (p = 0.489) or post-operative functional scores (p = 0.072). The complication rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (1/17 patients) than in the traditional open group (2/21 patients). Conclusions: Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation is a viable treatment for sacral fractures and can reduce blood loss and operative time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8876864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88768642022-02-26 Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures Tsai, Yao-Tung Chou, Yu-Ching Wu, Chia-Chun Yeh, Tsu-Te J Pers Med Article Purpose: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation (traditional open method, n = 21; minimally invasive technique, n = 17). Intergroup comparisons and statistical analysis were performed for intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative radiographic grading, post-operative functional score, and complication rates. Results: Patients treated with the minimally invasive technique had a significantly shorter operative time (−52 min, p = 0.022), reduced blood loss volume (−287 mL, p < 0.001), and better cosmetic appearance (p < 0.05) than those in the traditional open group. There were no significant intergroup differences in post-operative radiographic grading (p = 0.489) or post-operative functional scores (p = 0.072). The complication rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (1/17 patients) than in the traditional open group (2/21 patients). Conclusions: Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation is a viable treatment for sacral fractures and can reduce blood loss and operative time. MDPI 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8876864/ /pubmed/35207750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tsai, Yao-Tung Chou, Yu-Ching Wu, Chia-Chun Yeh, Tsu-Te Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title | Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title_full | Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title_fullStr | Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title_short | Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
title_sort | traditional versus minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for sacral fracture treatment in vertically unstable pelvic fractures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaiyaotung traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures AT chouyuching traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures AT wuchiachun traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures AT yehtsute traditionalversusminimallyinvasivespinopelvicfixationforsacralfracturetreatmentinverticallyunstablepelvicfractures |