Cargando…

A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation

(1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamadanchi, Ali, Ijuin, Shun, Haertel, Franz, Bekfani, Tarek, Westphal, Julian, Franz, Marcus, Moebius-Winkler, Sven, Schulze, P. Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059
_version_ 1784658331142455296
author Hamadanchi, Ali
Ijuin, Shun
Haertel, Franz
Bekfani, Tarek
Westphal, Julian
Franz, Marcus
Moebius-Winkler, Sven
Schulze, P. Christian
author_facet Hamadanchi, Ali
Ijuin, Shun
Haertel, Franz
Bekfani, Tarek
Westphal, Julian
Franz, Marcus
Moebius-Winkler, Sven
Schulze, P. Christian
author_sort Hamadanchi, Ali
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec(®), Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8877112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88771122022-02-26 A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation Hamadanchi, Ali Ijuin, Shun Haertel, Franz Bekfani, Tarek Westphal, Julian Franz, Marcus Moebius-Winkler, Sven Schulze, P. Christian J Clin Med Article (1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec(®), Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8877112/ /pubmed/35207334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hamadanchi, Ali
Ijuin, Shun
Haertel, Franz
Bekfani, Tarek
Westphal, Julian
Franz, Marcus
Moebius-Winkler, Sven
Schulze, P. Christian
A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title_full A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title_fullStr A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title_short A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
title_sort novel echocardiographic-based classification for the prediction of peri-device leakage following left atrial appendage occluder implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadanchiali anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT ijuinshun anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT haertelfranz anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT bekfanitarek anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT westphaljulian anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT franzmarcus anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT moebiuswinklersven anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT schulzepchristian anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT hamadanchiali novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT ijuinshun novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT haertelfranz novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT bekfanitarek novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT westphaljulian novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT franzmarcus novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT moebiuswinklersven novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation
AT schulzepchristian novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation