Cargando…
A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation
(1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059 |
_version_ | 1784658331142455296 |
---|---|
author | Hamadanchi, Ali Ijuin, Shun Haertel, Franz Bekfani, Tarek Westphal, Julian Franz, Marcus Moebius-Winkler, Sven Schulze, P. Christian |
author_facet | Hamadanchi, Ali Ijuin, Shun Haertel, Franz Bekfani, Tarek Westphal, Julian Franz, Marcus Moebius-Winkler, Sven Schulze, P. Christian |
author_sort | Hamadanchi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec(®), Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8877112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88771122022-02-26 A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation Hamadanchi, Ali Ijuin, Shun Haertel, Franz Bekfani, Tarek Westphal, Julian Franz, Marcus Moebius-Winkler, Sven Schulze, P. Christian J Clin Med Article (1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec(®), Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8877112/ /pubmed/35207334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hamadanchi, Ali Ijuin, Shun Haertel, Franz Bekfani, Tarek Westphal, Julian Franz, Marcus Moebius-Winkler, Sven Schulze, P. Christian A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title | A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title_full | A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title_fullStr | A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title_short | A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation |
title_sort | novel echocardiographic-based classification for the prediction of peri-device leakage following left atrial appendage occluder implantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamadanchiali anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT ijuinshun anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT haertelfranz anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT bekfanitarek anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT westphaljulian anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT franzmarcus anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT moebiuswinklersven anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT schulzepchristian anovelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT hamadanchiali novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT ijuinshun novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT haertelfranz novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT bekfanitarek novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT westphaljulian novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT franzmarcus novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT moebiuswinklersven novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation AT schulzepchristian novelechocardiographicbasedclassificationforthepredictionofperideviceleakagefollowingleftatrialappendageoccluderimplantation |