Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories

In mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from different laboratories/machines are an issue to be considered because various types of machines are used in each laboratory. Moreover, the analytical methods are unique to each laboratory. It is important to unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishiumi, Shin, Izumi, Yoshihiro, Hirayama, Akiyoshi, Takahashi, Masatomo, Nakao, Motonao, Hata, Kosuke, Saigusa, Daisuke, Hishinuma, Eiji, Matsukawa, Naomi, Tokuoka, Suzumi M., Kita, Yoshihiro, Hamano, Fumie, Okahashi, Nobuyuki, Ikeda, Kazutaka, Nakanishi, Hiroki, Saito, Kosuke, Hirai, Masami Yokota, Yoshida, Masaru, Oda, Yoshiya, Matsuda, Fumio, Bamba, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12020135
_version_ 1784658370739830784
author Nishiumi, Shin
Izumi, Yoshihiro
Hirayama, Akiyoshi
Takahashi, Masatomo
Nakao, Motonao
Hata, Kosuke
Saigusa, Daisuke
Hishinuma, Eiji
Matsukawa, Naomi
Tokuoka, Suzumi M.
Kita, Yoshihiro
Hamano, Fumie
Okahashi, Nobuyuki
Ikeda, Kazutaka
Nakanishi, Hiroki
Saito, Kosuke
Hirai, Masami Yokota
Yoshida, Masaru
Oda, Yoshiya
Matsuda, Fumio
Bamba, Takeshi
author_facet Nishiumi, Shin
Izumi, Yoshihiro
Hirayama, Akiyoshi
Takahashi, Masatomo
Nakao, Motonao
Hata, Kosuke
Saigusa, Daisuke
Hishinuma, Eiji
Matsukawa, Naomi
Tokuoka, Suzumi M.
Kita, Yoshihiro
Hamano, Fumie
Okahashi, Nobuyuki
Ikeda, Kazutaka
Nakanishi, Hiroki
Saito, Kosuke
Hirai, Masami Yokota
Yoshida, Masaru
Oda, Yoshiya
Matsuda, Fumio
Bamba, Takeshi
author_sort Nishiumi, Shin
collection PubMed
description In mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from different laboratories/machines are an issue to be considered because various types of machines are used in each laboratory. Moreover, the analytical methods are unique to each laboratory. It is important to understand the reality of inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics. Therefore, we have evaluated whether the differences in analytical methods, with the exception sample pretreatment and including metabolite extraction, are involved in the inter-laboratory differences or not. In this study, nine facilities are evaluated for inter-laboratory comparisons of metabolomic analysis. Identical dried samples prepared from human and mouse plasma are distributed to each laboratory, and the metabolites are measured without the pretreatment that is unique to each laboratory. In these measurements, hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites are analyzed using 11 and 7 analytical methods, respectively. The metabolomic data acquired at each laboratory are integrated, and the differences in the metabolomic data from the laboratories are evaluated. No substantial difference in the relative quantitative data (human/mouse) for a little less than 50% of the detected metabolites is observed, and the hydrophilic metabolites have fewer differences between the laboratories compared with hydrophobic metabolites. From evaluating selected quantitatively guaranteed metabolites, the proportion of metabolites without the inter-laboratory differences is observed to be slightly high. It is difficult to resolve the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics because all laboratories cannot prepare the same analytical environments. However, the results from this study indicate that the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomic data are due to measurement and data analysis rather than sample preparation, which will facilitate the understanding of the problems in metabolomics studies involving multiple laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8877229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88772292022-02-26 Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories Nishiumi, Shin Izumi, Yoshihiro Hirayama, Akiyoshi Takahashi, Masatomo Nakao, Motonao Hata, Kosuke Saigusa, Daisuke Hishinuma, Eiji Matsukawa, Naomi Tokuoka, Suzumi M. Kita, Yoshihiro Hamano, Fumie Okahashi, Nobuyuki Ikeda, Kazutaka Nakanishi, Hiroki Saito, Kosuke Hirai, Masami Yokota Yoshida, Masaru Oda, Yoshiya Matsuda, Fumio Bamba, Takeshi Metabolites Article In mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from different laboratories/machines are an issue to be considered because various types of machines are used in each laboratory. Moreover, the analytical methods are unique to each laboratory. It is important to understand the reality of inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics. Therefore, we have evaluated whether the differences in analytical methods, with the exception sample pretreatment and including metabolite extraction, are involved in the inter-laboratory differences or not. In this study, nine facilities are evaluated for inter-laboratory comparisons of metabolomic analysis. Identical dried samples prepared from human and mouse plasma are distributed to each laboratory, and the metabolites are measured without the pretreatment that is unique to each laboratory. In these measurements, hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites are analyzed using 11 and 7 analytical methods, respectively. The metabolomic data acquired at each laboratory are integrated, and the differences in the metabolomic data from the laboratories are evaluated. No substantial difference in the relative quantitative data (human/mouse) for a little less than 50% of the detected metabolites is observed, and the hydrophilic metabolites have fewer differences between the laboratories compared with hydrophobic metabolites. From evaluating selected quantitatively guaranteed metabolites, the proportion of metabolites without the inter-laboratory differences is observed to be slightly high. It is difficult to resolve the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics because all laboratories cannot prepare the same analytical environments. However, the results from this study indicate that the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomic data are due to measurement and data analysis rather than sample preparation, which will facilitate the understanding of the problems in metabolomics studies involving multiple laboratories. MDPI 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8877229/ /pubmed/35208210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12020135 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nishiumi, Shin
Izumi, Yoshihiro
Hirayama, Akiyoshi
Takahashi, Masatomo
Nakao, Motonao
Hata, Kosuke
Saigusa, Daisuke
Hishinuma, Eiji
Matsukawa, Naomi
Tokuoka, Suzumi M.
Kita, Yoshihiro
Hamano, Fumie
Okahashi, Nobuyuki
Ikeda, Kazutaka
Nakanishi, Hiroki
Saito, Kosuke
Hirai, Masami Yokota
Yoshida, Masaru
Oda, Yoshiya
Matsuda, Fumio
Bamba, Takeshi
Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Plasma Metabolomic Data from Multiple Laboratories
title_sort comparative evaluation of plasma metabolomic data from multiple laboratories
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12020135
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiumishin comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT izumiyoshihiro comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT hirayamaakiyoshi comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT takahashimasatomo comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT nakaomotonao comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT hatakosuke comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT saigusadaisuke comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT hishinumaeiji comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT matsukawanaomi comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT tokuokasuzumim comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT kitayoshihiro comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT hamanofumie comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT okahashinobuyuki comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT ikedakazutaka comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT nakanishihiroki comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT saitokosuke comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT hiraimasamiyokota comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT yoshidamasaru comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT odayoshiya comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT matsudafumio comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories
AT bambatakeshi comparativeevaluationofplasmametabolomicdatafrommultiplelaboratories