Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana

Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biniaz, Yaser, Tahmasebi, Aminallah, Afsharifar, Alireza, Tahmasebi, Ahmad, Poczai, Péter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502
_version_ 1784658401271218176
author Biniaz, Yaser
Tahmasebi, Aminallah
Afsharifar, Alireza
Tahmasebi, Ahmad
Poczai, Péter
author_facet Biniaz, Yaser
Tahmasebi, Aminallah
Afsharifar, Alireza
Tahmasebi, Ahmad
Poczai, Péter
author_sort Biniaz, Yaser
collection PubMed
description Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in Arabidopsis response to biotic and abiotic stresses. The results showed a total of 436/21 significant up-/downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to biotic stresses, while 476 and 71 significant DEGs were respectively up- and downregulated in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition, 21 DEGs (2.09%) were commonly regulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Except for WRKY45 and ATXTH22, which were respectively up-/down- and down-/upregulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, other common DEGs were upregulated in response to all biotic and abiotic treatments. Moreover, the transcription factors (TFs) bHLH, MYB, and WRKY were the common TFs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, ath-miR414 and ath-miR5658 were identified to be commonly expressed in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses. The identified common genes and pathways during biotic and abiotic stresses may provide potential candidate targets for the development of stress resistance breeding programs and for the genetic manipulation of crop plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8877356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88773562022-02-26 Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana Biniaz, Yaser Tahmasebi, Aminallah Afsharifar, Alireza Tahmasebi, Ahmad Poczai, Péter Plants (Basel) Article Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in Arabidopsis response to biotic and abiotic stresses. The results showed a total of 436/21 significant up-/downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to biotic stresses, while 476 and 71 significant DEGs were respectively up- and downregulated in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition, 21 DEGs (2.09%) were commonly regulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Except for WRKY45 and ATXTH22, which were respectively up-/down- and down-/upregulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, other common DEGs were upregulated in response to all biotic and abiotic treatments. Moreover, the transcription factors (TFs) bHLH, MYB, and WRKY were the common TFs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, ath-miR414 and ath-miR5658 were identified to be commonly expressed in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses. The identified common genes and pathways during biotic and abiotic stresses may provide potential candidate targets for the development of stress resistance breeding programs and for the genetic manipulation of crop plants. MDPI 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8877356/ /pubmed/35214836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Biniaz, Yaser
Tahmasebi, Aminallah
Afsharifar, Alireza
Tahmasebi, Ahmad
Poczai, Péter
Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_full Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_short Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_sort meta-analysis of common and differential transcriptomic responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in arabidopsis thaliana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502
work_keys_str_mv AT biniazyaser metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana
AT tahmasebiaminallah metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana
AT afsharifaralireza metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana
AT tahmasebiahmad metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana
AT poczaipeter metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana