Cargando…
Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502 |
_version_ | 1784658401271218176 |
---|---|
author | Biniaz, Yaser Tahmasebi, Aminallah Afsharifar, Alireza Tahmasebi, Ahmad Poczai, Péter |
author_facet | Biniaz, Yaser Tahmasebi, Aminallah Afsharifar, Alireza Tahmasebi, Ahmad Poczai, Péter |
author_sort | Biniaz, Yaser |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in Arabidopsis response to biotic and abiotic stresses. The results showed a total of 436/21 significant up-/downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to biotic stresses, while 476 and 71 significant DEGs were respectively up- and downregulated in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition, 21 DEGs (2.09%) were commonly regulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Except for WRKY45 and ATXTH22, which were respectively up-/down- and down-/upregulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, other common DEGs were upregulated in response to all biotic and abiotic treatments. Moreover, the transcription factors (TFs) bHLH, MYB, and WRKY were the common TFs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, ath-miR414 and ath-miR5658 were identified to be commonly expressed in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses. The identified common genes and pathways during biotic and abiotic stresses may provide potential candidate targets for the development of stress resistance breeding programs and for the genetic manipulation of crop plants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8877356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88773562022-02-26 Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana Biniaz, Yaser Tahmasebi, Aminallah Afsharifar, Alireza Tahmasebi, Ahmad Poczai, Péter Plants (Basel) Article Environmental stresses adversely affect crop growth and yield, resulting in major losses to plants. These stresses occur simultaneously in nature, and we therefore conducted a meta-analysis in this study to identify differential and shared genes, pathways, and transcriptomic mechanisms involved in Arabidopsis response to biotic and abiotic stresses. The results showed a total of 436/21 significant up-/downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to biotic stresses, while 476 and 71 significant DEGs were respectively up- and downregulated in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition, 21 DEGs (2.09%) were commonly regulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Except for WRKY45 and ATXTH22, which were respectively up-/down- and down-/upregulated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, other common DEGs were upregulated in response to all biotic and abiotic treatments. Moreover, the transcription factors (TFs) bHLH, MYB, and WRKY were the common TFs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, ath-miR414 and ath-miR5658 were identified to be commonly expressed in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses. The identified common genes and pathways during biotic and abiotic stresses may provide potential candidate targets for the development of stress resistance breeding programs and for the genetic manipulation of crop plants. MDPI 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8877356/ /pubmed/35214836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Biniaz, Yaser Tahmasebi, Aminallah Afsharifar, Alireza Tahmasebi, Ahmad Poczai, Péter Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title | Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title_full | Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title_short | Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana |
title_sort | meta-analysis of common and differential transcriptomic responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in arabidopsis thaliana |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11040502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biniazyaser metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana AT tahmasebiaminallah metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana AT afsharifaralireza metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana AT tahmasebiahmad metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana AT poczaipeter metaanalysisofcommonanddifferentialtranscriptomicresponsestobioticandabioticstressesinarabidopsisthaliana |