Cargando…
An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. Thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w |
_version_ | 1784658492603236352 |
---|---|
author | Fraiman, Joseph Brownlee, Shannon Stoto, Michael A. Lin, Kenneth W. Huffstetler, Alison N. |
author_facet | Fraiman, Joseph Brownlee, Shannon Stoto, Michael A. Lin, Kenneth W. Huffstetler, Alison N. |
author_sort | Fraiman, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. This study is the first systematic review of the rate of non-indicated completed screening colonoscopy in the USA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried for relevant studies on overuse of screening colonoscopy published from January 1, 2002, until January 23, 2019. English-language studies that were conducted for screening colonoscopy after 2001 for average-risk patients were included. Studies must have followed national guidelines for detecting rates of overuse. We followed methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the reporting recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group (MOOSE). RESULTS: A total of 772 papers were reviewed for inclusion; 42 were reviewed in full text. Of those reviewed, six studies met eligibility criteria, including a total of 459,503 colonoscopies of which 242,756 were screening colonoscopies. The rate of overuse ranged credibly from 17 to 25.7%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that screening colonoscopy is regularly performed in the USA more often, and in populations older or younger, than recommended by national guidelines. Such overuse wastes resources and places patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Efforts to reduce non-indicated screening colonoscopy are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8877747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88777472022-02-28 An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review Fraiman, Joseph Brownlee, Shannon Stoto, Michael A. Lin, Kenneth W. Huffstetler, Alison N. J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. This study is the first systematic review of the rate of non-indicated completed screening colonoscopy in the USA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried for relevant studies on overuse of screening colonoscopy published from January 1, 2002, until January 23, 2019. English-language studies that were conducted for screening colonoscopy after 2001 for average-risk patients were included. Studies must have followed national guidelines for detecting rates of overuse. We followed methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the reporting recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group (MOOSE). RESULTS: A total of 772 papers were reviewed for inclusion; 42 were reviewed in full text. Of those reviewed, six studies met eligibility criteria, including a total of 459,503 colonoscopies of which 242,756 were screening colonoscopies. The rate of overuse ranged credibly from 17 to 25.7%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that screening colonoscopy is regularly performed in the USA more often, and in populations older or younger, than recommended by national guidelines. Such overuse wastes resources and places patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Efforts to reduce non-indicated screening colonoscopy are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-25 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8877747/ /pubmed/35212879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2021 |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fraiman, Joseph Brownlee, Shannon Stoto, Michael A. Lin, Kenneth W. Huffstetler, Alison N. An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title | An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title_full | An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title_short | An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review |
title_sort | estimate of the us rate of overuse of screening colonoscopy: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fraimanjoseph anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT brownleeshannon anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT stotomichaela anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT linkennethw anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT huffstetleralisonn anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT fraimanjoseph estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT brownleeshannon estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT stotomichaela estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT linkennethw estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview AT huffstetleralisonn estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview |