Cargando…

An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fraiman, Joseph, Brownlee, Shannon, Stoto, Michael A., Lin, Kenneth W., Huffstetler, Alison N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w
_version_ 1784658492603236352
author Fraiman, Joseph
Brownlee, Shannon
Stoto, Michael A.
Lin, Kenneth W.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
author_facet Fraiman, Joseph
Brownlee, Shannon
Stoto, Michael A.
Lin, Kenneth W.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
author_sort Fraiman, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. This study is the first systematic review of the rate of non-indicated completed screening colonoscopy in the USA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried for relevant studies on overuse of screening colonoscopy published from January 1, 2002, until January 23, 2019. English-language studies that were conducted for screening colonoscopy after 2001 for average-risk patients were included. Studies must have followed national guidelines for detecting rates of overuse. We followed methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the reporting recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group (MOOSE). RESULTS: A total of 772 papers were reviewed for inclusion; 42 were reviewed in full text. Of those reviewed, six studies met eligibility criteria, including a total of 459,503 colonoscopies of which 242,756 were screening colonoscopies. The rate of overuse ranged credibly from 17 to 25.7%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that screening colonoscopy is regularly performed in the USA more often, and in populations older or younger, than recommended by national guidelines. Such overuse wastes resources and places patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Efforts to reduce non-indicated screening colonoscopy are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8877747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88777472022-02-28 An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review Fraiman, Joseph Brownlee, Shannon Stoto, Michael A. Lin, Kenneth W. Huffstetler, Alison N. J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. This study is the first systematic review of the rate of non-indicated completed screening colonoscopy in the USA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried for relevant studies on overuse of screening colonoscopy published from January 1, 2002, until January 23, 2019. English-language studies that were conducted for screening colonoscopy after 2001 for average-risk patients were included. Studies must have followed national guidelines for detecting rates of overuse. We followed methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the reporting recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group (MOOSE). RESULTS: A total of 772 papers were reviewed for inclusion; 42 were reviewed in full text. Of those reviewed, six studies met eligibility criteria, including a total of 459,503 colonoscopies of which 242,756 were screening colonoscopies. The rate of overuse ranged credibly from 17 to 25.7%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that screening colonoscopy is regularly performed in the USA more often, and in populations older or younger, than recommended by national guidelines. Such overuse wastes resources and places patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Efforts to reduce non-indicated screening colonoscopy are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-25 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8877747/ /pubmed/35212879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2021
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Fraiman, Joseph
Brownlee, Shannon
Stoto, Michael A.
Lin, Kenneth W.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title_full An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title_short An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
title_sort estimate of the us rate of overuse of screening colonoscopy: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w
work_keys_str_mv AT fraimanjoseph anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT brownleeshannon anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT stotomichaela anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT linkennethw anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT huffstetleralisonn anestimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT fraimanjoseph estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT brownleeshannon estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT stotomichaela estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT linkennethw estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview
AT huffstetleralisonn estimateoftheusrateofoveruseofscreeningcolonoscopyasystematicreview