Cargando…

Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice

Background: A drug and disease assessment model was used to evaluate the impact of different treatment regimens on intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab concentrations and the proportion of free vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to total VEGF. Methods: A time-d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veritti, Daniele, Sarao, Valentina, Gorni, Gianluca, Lanzetta, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35213999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020265
_version_ 1784658530677030912
author Veritti, Daniele
Sarao, Valentina
Gorni, Gianluca
Lanzetta, Paolo
author_facet Veritti, Daniele
Sarao, Valentina
Gorni, Gianluca
Lanzetta, Paolo
author_sort Veritti, Daniele
collection PubMed
description Background: A drug and disease assessment model was used to evaluate the impact of different treatment regimens on intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab concentrations and the proportion of free vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to total VEGF. Methods: A time-dependent mathematical model using Wolfram Mathematica software was used. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for anti-VEGFs were obtained from published reports. The model simulated drug concentration after single and multiple doses of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab, and it extrapolated time-dependent intraocular free VEGF proportion values. Various fixed treatment regimens (q4, q8, q10, q12) were simulated and evaluated as candidates for clinical utilization. Results: Our mathematical model shows good correlation between intraocular VEGF proportion values and clinical data. Simulations suggest that each anti-VEGF agent would allow for distinct treatment intervals to keep the proportion of free VEGF under threshold levels. Regimens scheduling q8 ranibizumab, q8 bevacizumab, q12 aflibercept, and q10 brolucizumab administration permit to maintain the proportion of unbound VEGF below 0.001%. Conclusions: Fixed q8 ranibizumab, q8 bevacizumab, q12 aflibercept, or q10 brolucizumab regimens may produce adequate intraocular VEGF inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8877911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88779112022-02-26 Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice Veritti, Daniele Sarao, Valentina Gorni, Gianluca Lanzetta, Paolo Pharmaceutics Article Background: A drug and disease assessment model was used to evaluate the impact of different treatment regimens on intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab concentrations and the proportion of free vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to total VEGF. Methods: A time-dependent mathematical model using Wolfram Mathematica software was used. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for anti-VEGFs were obtained from published reports. The model simulated drug concentration after single and multiple doses of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab, and it extrapolated time-dependent intraocular free VEGF proportion values. Various fixed treatment regimens (q4, q8, q10, q12) were simulated and evaluated as candidates for clinical utilization. Results: Our mathematical model shows good correlation between intraocular VEGF proportion values and clinical data. Simulations suggest that each anti-VEGF agent would allow for distinct treatment intervals to keep the proportion of free VEGF under threshold levels. Regimens scheduling q8 ranibizumab, q8 bevacizumab, q12 aflibercept, and q10 brolucizumab administration permit to maintain the proportion of unbound VEGF below 0.001%. Conclusions: Fixed q8 ranibizumab, q8 bevacizumab, q12 aflibercept, or q10 brolucizumab regimens may produce adequate intraocular VEGF inhibition. MDPI 2022-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8877911/ /pubmed/35213999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020265 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Veritti, Daniele
Sarao, Valentina
Gorni, Gianluca
Lanzetta, Paolo
Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_full Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_short Anti-VEGF Drugs Dynamics: Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_sort anti-vegf drugs dynamics: relevance for clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35213999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020265
work_keys_str_mv AT verittidaniele antivegfdrugsdynamicsrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT saraovalentina antivegfdrugsdynamicsrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT gornigianluca antivegfdrugsdynamicsrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT lanzettapaolo antivegfdrugsdynamicsrelevanceforclinicalpractice