Cargando…

Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand

This sequential explanatory mixed-method study consisted of analytical, cross-sectional, and qualitative studies. The research was conducted in the Khao Nor and Khao Kaew areas of the Banphot Pisai districts of Nakhon Sawan Province in 2019. Here, we examined the rodent contact characteristics of vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suwannarong, Kanokwan, Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol, Maneekan, Pannamas, Yimsamran, Surapon, Balthip, Karnsunaphat, Maneewatchararangsri, Santi, Saisongkorh, Watcharee, Saengkul, Chutarat, Sangmukdanun, Suntaree, Phunta, Nittaya, Singhasivanon, Pratap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020085
_version_ 1784658567320567808
author Suwannarong, Kanokwan
Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol
Maneekan, Pannamas
Yimsamran, Surapon
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Maneewatchararangsri, Santi
Saisongkorh, Watcharee
Saengkul, Chutarat
Sangmukdanun, Suntaree
Phunta, Nittaya
Singhasivanon, Pratap
author_facet Suwannarong, Kanokwan
Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol
Maneekan, Pannamas
Yimsamran, Surapon
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Maneewatchararangsri, Santi
Saisongkorh, Watcharee
Saengkul, Chutarat
Sangmukdanun, Suntaree
Phunta, Nittaya
Singhasivanon, Pratap
author_sort Suwannarong, Kanokwan
collection PubMed
description This sequential explanatory mixed-method study consisted of analytical, cross-sectional, and qualitative studies. The research was conducted in the Khao Nor and Khao Kaew areas of the Banphot Pisai districts of Nakhon Sawan Province in 2019. Here, we examined the rodent contact characteristics of villagers in these areas and determined the potential characteristics/risk factors associated with rodents using a semi-structured questionnaire, key informant interview (KII), and focus group discussion (FGD). Results of the quantitative study (N1 = 372) characterized participants that contacted rodents per gender, age, occupation, knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP), including their cultural contexts, and beliefs. Ninety participants (24.2%) reported contact with rodents, and the reasons for their direct physical rodent contact were hunting (35, 9.4%), killing (41, 11.0%), preparing rodents as food (33, 8.9%), consuming cooked meats (12, 3.2%), feeding food (4, 1.1%), cleaning feces (17, 4.6%), and cleaning carcasses (33, 8.9%). Moreover, logistic regression results showed that males encountering rodents were statistically significant (Adjusted OR = 3.137, 95% CI 1.914–5.139, p < 0.001). Low monthly household income (<THB 15,000 or <USD 450) was also negatively statistically significant with encountering rodents (Adjusted OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–0.99, p = 0.04). Additionally, the villagers had a low level of knowledge toward zoonotic diseases and inappropriate attitudes and practices toward contacting rodents and zoonotic diseases. Thirty-five qualitative study participants (N2) participated in the KIIs and FGDs. Various rodent contact activities were also reported among the qualitative research participants, such as hunting, consumption, and selling them to their friends and neighbors. However, these rodents also destroyed their belongings, crops, and plants. Some participants also reported that rodents accounted for leptospirosis transmission. As a result, communication intervention should be planned to provide appropriate knowledge and attitude to the villagers, especially among those who have close contact with rodents in the understudied area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88780752022-02-26 Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand Suwannarong, Kanokwan Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol Maneekan, Pannamas Yimsamran, Surapon Balthip, Karnsunaphat Maneewatchararangsri, Santi Saisongkorh, Watcharee Saengkul, Chutarat Sangmukdanun, Suntaree Phunta, Nittaya Singhasivanon, Pratap Vet Sci Article This sequential explanatory mixed-method study consisted of analytical, cross-sectional, and qualitative studies. The research was conducted in the Khao Nor and Khao Kaew areas of the Banphot Pisai districts of Nakhon Sawan Province in 2019. Here, we examined the rodent contact characteristics of villagers in these areas and determined the potential characteristics/risk factors associated with rodents using a semi-structured questionnaire, key informant interview (KII), and focus group discussion (FGD). Results of the quantitative study (N1 = 372) characterized participants that contacted rodents per gender, age, occupation, knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP), including their cultural contexts, and beliefs. Ninety participants (24.2%) reported contact with rodents, and the reasons for their direct physical rodent contact were hunting (35, 9.4%), killing (41, 11.0%), preparing rodents as food (33, 8.9%), consuming cooked meats (12, 3.2%), feeding food (4, 1.1%), cleaning feces (17, 4.6%), and cleaning carcasses (33, 8.9%). Moreover, logistic regression results showed that males encountering rodents were statistically significant (Adjusted OR = 3.137, 95% CI 1.914–5.139, p < 0.001). Low monthly household income (<THB 15,000 or <USD 450) was also negatively statistically significant with encountering rodents (Adjusted OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–0.99, p = 0.04). Additionally, the villagers had a low level of knowledge toward zoonotic diseases and inappropriate attitudes and practices toward contacting rodents and zoonotic diseases. Thirty-five qualitative study participants (N2) participated in the KIIs and FGDs. Various rodent contact activities were also reported among the qualitative research participants, such as hunting, consumption, and selling them to their friends and neighbors. However, these rodents also destroyed their belongings, crops, and plants. Some participants also reported that rodents accounted for leptospirosis transmission. As a result, communication intervention should be planned to provide appropriate knowledge and attitude to the villagers, especially among those who have close contact with rodents in the understudied area. MDPI 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8878075/ /pubmed/35202338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020085 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Suwannarong, Kanokwan
Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol
Maneekan, Pannamas
Yimsamran, Surapon
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Maneewatchararangsri, Santi
Saisongkorh, Watcharee
Saengkul, Chutarat
Sangmukdanun, Suntaree
Phunta, Nittaya
Singhasivanon, Pratap
Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title_full Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title_fullStr Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title_short Rodent–Human Interface: Behavioral Risk Factors and Leptospirosis in a Province in the Central Region of Thailand
title_sort rodent–human interface: behavioral risk factors and leptospirosis in a province in the central region of thailand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020085
work_keys_str_mv AT suwannarongkanokwan rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT soonthornworasiringamphol rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT maneekanpannamas rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT yimsamransurapon rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT balthipkarnsunaphat rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT maneewatchararangsrisanti rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT saisongkorhwatcharee rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT saengkulchutarat rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT sangmukdanunsuntaree rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT phuntanittaya rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand
AT singhasivanonpratap rodenthumaninterfacebehavioralriskfactorsandleptospirosisinaprovinceinthecentralregionofthailand