Cargando…
A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573 |
_version_ | 1784658636387123200 |
---|---|
author | Ghasemian, Bahareh Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Al-Ansari, Nadhir Jaafari, Abolfazl Kress, Victoria R. Geertsema, Marten Renoud, Somayeh Ahmad, Anuar |
author_facet | Ghasemian, Bahareh Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Al-Ansari, Nadhir Jaafari, Abolfazl Kress, Victoria R. Geertsema, Marten Renoud, Somayeh Ahmad, Anuar |
author_sort | Ghasemian, Bahareh |
collection | PubMed |
description | We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were recorded and divided in the training and testing datasets. We selected 25 conditioning factors, and of these, we specified the most important ones by an information gain ratio (IGR) technique. We assessed the performance of the DP model using statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-measure, and area under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three benchmark algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), REPTree, and NBTree, were used to check the applicability of the proposed model. The results by IGR concluded that of the 25 conditioning factors, only 16 factors were important for our modeling procedure, and of these, distance to road, road density, lithology and land use were the four most significant factors. Results based on the testing dataset revealed that the DP model had the highest accuracy (0.926) of the compared algorithms, followed by NBTree (0.917), REPTree (0.903), and SVM (0.894). The landslide susceptibility maps prepared from the DP model with AUC = 0.870 performed the best. We consider the DP model a suitable tool for landslide susceptibility mapping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8878333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88783332022-02-26 A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran Ghasemian, Bahareh Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Al-Ansari, Nadhir Jaafari, Abolfazl Kress, Victoria R. Geertsema, Marten Renoud, Somayeh Ahmad, Anuar Sensors (Basel) Article We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were recorded and divided in the training and testing datasets. We selected 25 conditioning factors, and of these, we specified the most important ones by an information gain ratio (IGR) technique. We assessed the performance of the DP model using statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-measure, and area under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three benchmark algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), REPTree, and NBTree, were used to check the applicability of the proposed model. The results by IGR concluded that of the 25 conditioning factors, only 16 factors were important for our modeling procedure, and of these, distance to road, road density, lithology and land use were the four most significant factors. Results based on the testing dataset revealed that the DP model had the highest accuracy (0.926) of the compared algorithms, followed by NBTree (0.917), REPTree (0.903), and SVM (0.894). The landslide susceptibility maps prepared from the DP model with AUC = 0.870 performed the best. We consider the DP model a suitable tool for landslide susceptibility mapping. MDPI 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8878333/ /pubmed/35214473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ghasemian, Bahareh Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Al-Ansari, Nadhir Jaafari, Abolfazl Kress, Victoria R. Geertsema, Marten Renoud, Somayeh Ahmad, Anuar A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title | A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title_full | A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title_fullStr | A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title_full_unstemmed | A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title_short | A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran |
title_sort | robust deep-learning model for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of kurdistan province, iran |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghasemianbahareh arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT shahabihiman arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT shirzadiataollah arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT alansarinadhir arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT jaafariabolfazl arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT kressvictoriar arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT geertsemamarten arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT renoudsomayeh arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT ahmadanuar arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT ghasemianbahareh robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT shahabihiman robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT shirzadiataollah robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT alansarinadhir robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT jaafariabolfazl robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT kressvictoriar robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT geertsemamarten robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT renoudsomayeh robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran AT ahmadanuar robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran |