Cargando…

A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran

We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemian, Bahareh, Shahabi, Himan, Shirzadi, Ataollah, Al-Ansari, Nadhir, Jaafari, Abolfazl, Kress, Victoria R., Geertsema, Marten, Renoud, Somayeh, Ahmad, Anuar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573
_version_ 1784658636387123200
author Ghasemian, Bahareh
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Al-Ansari, Nadhir
Jaafari, Abolfazl
Kress, Victoria R.
Geertsema, Marten
Renoud, Somayeh
Ahmad, Anuar
author_facet Ghasemian, Bahareh
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Al-Ansari, Nadhir
Jaafari, Abolfazl
Kress, Victoria R.
Geertsema, Marten
Renoud, Somayeh
Ahmad, Anuar
author_sort Ghasemian, Bahareh
collection PubMed
description We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were recorded and divided in the training and testing datasets. We selected 25 conditioning factors, and of these, we specified the most important ones by an information gain ratio (IGR) technique. We assessed the performance of the DP model using statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-measure, and area under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three benchmark algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), REPTree, and NBTree, were used to check the applicability of the proposed model. The results by IGR concluded that of the 25 conditioning factors, only 16 factors were important for our modeling procedure, and of these, distance to road, road density, lithology and land use were the four most significant factors. Results based on the testing dataset revealed that the DP model had the highest accuracy (0.926) of the compared algorithms, followed by NBTree (0.917), REPTree (0.903), and SVM (0.894). The landslide susceptibility maps prepared from the DP model with AUC = 0.870 performed the best. We consider the DP model a suitable tool for landslide susceptibility mapping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88783332022-02-26 A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran Ghasemian, Bahareh Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Al-Ansari, Nadhir Jaafari, Abolfazl Kress, Victoria R. Geertsema, Marten Renoud, Somayeh Ahmad, Anuar Sensors (Basel) Article We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were recorded and divided in the training and testing datasets. We selected 25 conditioning factors, and of these, we specified the most important ones by an information gain ratio (IGR) technique. We assessed the performance of the DP model using statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-measure, and area under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three benchmark algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), REPTree, and NBTree, were used to check the applicability of the proposed model. The results by IGR concluded that of the 25 conditioning factors, only 16 factors were important for our modeling procedure, and of these, distance to road, road density, lithology and land use were the four most significant factors. Results based on the testing dataset revealed that the DP model had the highest accuracy (0.926) of the compared algorithms, followed by NBTree (0.917), REPTree (0.903), and SVM (0.894). The landslide susceptibility maps prepared from the DP model with AUC = 0.870 performed the best. We consider the DP model a suitable tool for landslide susceptibility mapping. MDPI 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8878333/ /pubmed/35214473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ghasemian, Bahareh
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Al-Ansari, Nadhir
Jaafari, Abolfazl
Kress, Victoria R.
Geertsema, Marten
Renoud, Somayeh
Ahmad, Anuar
A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title_full A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title_fullStr A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title_full_unstemmed A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title_short A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran
title_sort robust deep-learning model for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of kurdistan province, iran
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22041573
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemianbahareh arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT shahabihiman arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT shirzadiataollah arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT alansarinadhir arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT jaafariabolfazl arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT kressvictoriar arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT geertsemamarten arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT renoudsomayeh arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT ahmadanuar arobustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT ghasemianbahareh robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT shahabihiman robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT shirzadiataollah robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT alansarinadhir robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT jaafariabolfazl robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT kressvictoriar robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT geertsemamarten robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT renoudsomayeh robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran
AT ahmadanuar robustdeeplearningmodelforlandslidesusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofkurdistanprovinceiran