Cargando…

The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milone, Marco, Manigrasso, Michele, Anoldo, Pietro, D’Amore, Anna, Elmore, Ugo, Giglio, Mariano Cesare, Rompianesi, Gianluca, Vertaldi, Sara, Troisi, Roberto Ivan, Francis, Nader K., De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307
_version_ 1784658640543678464
author Milone, Marco
Manigrasso, Michele
Anoldo, Pietro
D’Amore, Anna
Elmore, Ugo
Giglio, Mariano Cesare
Rompianesi, Gianluca
Vertaldi, Sara
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
Francis, Nader K.
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
author_facet Milone, Marco
Manigrasso, Michele
Anoldo, Pietro
D’Amore, Anna
Elmore, Ugo
Giglio, Mariano Cesare
Rompianesi, Gianluca
Vertaldi, Sara
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
Francis, Nader K.
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
author_sort Milone, Marco
collection PubMed
description Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery; reporting data on conversion to open surgery for each group due to adhesions and studies including at least five patients in each group. The main outcomes were the conversion rates due to adhesions and surgeons’ expertise (novice vs. expert). The meta-analysis included 70 studies from different surgical specialities with 14,329 procedures (6472 robotic and 7857 laparoscopic). The robotic approach was associated with a reduced risk of conversion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12–2.10, p = 0.007). The analysis of the procedures performed by “expert surgeons” showed a statistically significant difference in favour of robotic surgery (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12, p = 0.03). A reduced conversion rate due to adhesions with the robotic approach was observed in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.20–5.72, p = 0.02). The robotic approach could be a valid option in patients with abdominal adhesions, especially in the subgroup of those undergoing colorectal cancer resection performed by expert surgeons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88783522022-02-26 The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Milone, Marco Manigrasso, Michele Anoldo, Pietro D’Amore, Anna Elmore, Ugo Giglio, Mariano Cesare Rompianesi, Gianluca Vertaldi, Sara Troisi, Roberto Ivan Francis, Nader K. De Palma, Giovanni Domenico J Pers Med Systematic Review Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery; reporting data on conversion to open surgery for each group due to adhesions and studies including at least five patients in each group. The main outcomes were the conversion rates due to adhesions and surgeons’ expertise (novice vs. expert). The meta-analysis included 70 studies from different surgical specialities with 14,329 procedures (6472 robotic and 7857 laparoscopic). The robotic approach was associated with a reduced risk of conversion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12–2.10, p = 0.007). The analysis of the procedures performed by “expert surgeons” showed a statistically significant difference in favour of robotic surgery (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12, p = 0.03). A reduced conversion rate due to adhesions with the robotic approach was observed in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.20–5.72, p = 0.02). The robotic approach could be a valid option in patients with abdominal adhesions, especially in the subgroup of those undergoing colorectal cancer resection performed by expert surgeons. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8878352/ /pubmed/35207795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Milone, Marco
Manigrasso, Michele
Anoldo, Pietro
D’Amore, Anna
Elmore, Ugo
Giglio, Mariano Cesare
Rompianesi, Gianluca
Vertaldi, Sara
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
Francis, Nader K.
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort role of robotic visceral surgery in patients with adhesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307
work_keys_str_mv AT milonemarco theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manigrassomichele theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anoldopietro theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT damoreanna theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elmoreugo theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gigliomarianocesare theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rompianesigianluca theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vertaldisara theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT troisirobertoivan theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francisnaderk theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT depalmagiovannidomenico theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT milonemarco roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manigrassomichele roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anoldopietro roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT damoreanna roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elmoreugo roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gigliomarianocesare roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rompianesigianluca roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vertaldisara roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT troisirobertoivan roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francisnaderk roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT depalmagiovannidomenico roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis