Cargando…
The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307 |
_version_ | 1784658640543678464 |
---|---|
author | Milone, Marco Manigrasso, Michele Anoldo, Pietro D’Amore, Anna Elmore, Ugo Giglio, Mariano Cesare Rompianesi, Gianluca Vertaldi, Sara Troisi, Roberto Ivan Francis, Nader K. De Palma, Giovanni Domenico |
author_facet | Milone, Marco Manigrasso, Michele Anoldo, Pietro D’Amore, Anna Elmore, Ugo Giglio, Mariano Cesare Rompianesi, Gianluca Vertaldi, Sara Troisi, Roberto Ivan Francis, Nader K. De Palma, Giovanni Domenico |
author_sort | Milone, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery; reporting data on conversion to open surgery for each group due to adhesions and studies including at least five patients in each group. The main outcomes were the conversion rates due to adhesions and surgeons’ expertise (novice vs. expert). The meta-analysis included 70 studies from different surgical specialities with 14,329 procedures (6472 robotic and 7857 laparoscopic). The robotic approach was associated with a reduced risk of conversion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12–2.10, p = 0.007). The analysis of the procedures performed by “expert surgeons” showed a statistically significant difference in favour of robotic surgery (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12, p = 0.03). A reduced conversion rate due to adhesions with the robotic approach was observed in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.20–5.72, p = 0.02). The robotic approach could be a valid option in patients with abdominal adhesions, especially in the subgroup of those undergoing colorectal cancer resection performed by expert surgeons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8878352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88783522022-02-26 The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Milone, Marco Manigrasso, Michele Anoldo, Pietro D’Amore, Anna Elmore, Ugo Giglio, Mariano Cesare Rompianesi, Gianluca Vertaldi, Sara Troisi, Roberto Ivan Francis, Nader K. De Palma, Giovanni Domenico J Pers Med Systematic Review Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery; reporting data on conversion to open surgery for each group due to adhesions and studies including at least five patients in each group. The main outcomes were the conversion rates due to adhesions and surgeons’ expertise (novice vs. expert). The meta-analysis included 70 studies from different surgical specialities with 14,329 procedures (6472 robotic and 7857 laparoscopic). The robotic approach was associated with a reduced risk of conversion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12–2.10, p = 0.007). The analysis of the procedures performed by “expert surgeons” showed a statistically significant difference in favour of robotic surgery (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12, p = 0.03). A reduced conversion rate due to adhesions with the robotic approach was observed in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.20–5.72, p = 0.02). The robotic approach could be a valid option in patients with abdominal adhesions, especially in the subgroup of those undergoing colorectal cancer resection performed by expert surgeons. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8878352/ /pubmed/35207795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Milone, Marco Manigrasso, Michele Anoldo, Pietro D’Amore, Anna Elmore, Ugo Giglio, Mariano Cesare Rompianesi, Gianluca Vertaldi, Sara Troisi, Roberto Ivan Francis, Nader K. De Palma, Giovanni Domenico The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | role of robotic visceral surgery in patients with adhesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milonemarco theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT manigrassomichele theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anoldopietro theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT damoreanna theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT elmoreugo theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gigliomarianocesare theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rompianesigianluca theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vertaldisara theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT troisirobertoivan theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT francisnaderk theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT depalmagiovannidomenico theroleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT milonemarco roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT manigrassomichele roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anoldopietro roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT damoreanna roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT elmoreugo roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gigliomarianocesare roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rompianesigianluca roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vertaldisara roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT troisirobertoivan roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT francisnaderk roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT depalmagiovannidomenico roleofroboticvisceralsurgeryinpatientswithadhesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |