Cargando…
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
This study compared survival outcomes for patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2009) cervical cancer who underwent open radical hysterectomy (ORH) versus those who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) using vaginal colpotomy...
Autores principales: | Yang, Eun Jung, Kim, Nae Ry, Lee, A. Jin, Shim, Seung-Hyuk, Lee, Sun Joo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028911 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Primary radical hysterectomy vs chemoradiation for IB2-IIA cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Yan, Ruo-nan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Pelviscopic Compared to Laparotomic and Vaginal Intrafascial Hysterectomy
por: Mettler, L., et al.
Publicado: (1997) -
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with enclosed colpotomy without the use of uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer
por: Ding, Bo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Vaginal cuff length during radical hysterectomy is a prognostic factor for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zuo, Na, et al.
Publicado: (2018)