Cargando…
Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program
We compared patient cohorts selected for pharmacogenomic testing using a manual method or automated algorithm in a university-based health insurance network. The medication list was compiled from claims data during 4th quarter 2018. The manual method selected patients by number of medications by the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020161 |
_version_ | 1784658737085022208 |
---|---|
author | Grande, Kendra J. Dalton, Rachel Moyer, Nicolas A. Arwood, Meghan J. Nguyen, Khoa A. Sumfest, Jill Ashcraft, Kristine C. Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M. |
author_facet | Grande, Kendra J. Dalton, Rachel Moyer, Nicolas A. Arwood, Meghan J. Nguyen, Khoa A. Sumfest, Jill Ashcraft, Kristine C. Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M. |
author_sort | Grande, Kendra J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared patient cohorts selected for pharmacogenomic testing using a manual method or automated algorithm in a university-based health insurance network. The medication list was compiled from claims data during 4th quarter 2018. The manual method selected patients by number of medications by the health system’s list of medications for pharmacogenomic testing. The automated method used YouScript’s pharmacogenetic interaction probability (PIP) algorithm to select patients based on the probability that testing would result in detection of one or more clinically significant pharmacogenetic interactions. A total of 6916 patients were included. Patient cohorts selected by each method differed substantially, including size (manual n = 218, automated n = 286) and overlap (n = 41). The automated method was over twice as likely to identify patients where testing may reveal a clinically significant pharmacogenetic interaction than the manual method (62% vs. 29%, p < 0.0001). The manual method captured more patients with significant drug–drug or multi-drug interactions (80.3% vs. 40.2%, respectively, p < 0.0001), higher average number of significant drug interactions per patient (3.3 vs. 1.1, p < 0.0001), and higher average number of unique medications per patient (9.8 vs. 7.4, p < 0.0001). It is possible to identify a cohort of patients who would likely benefit from pharmacogenomic testing using manual or automated methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8878761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88787612022-02-26 Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program Grande, Kendra J. Dalton, Rachel Moyer, Nicolas A. Arwood, Meghan J. Nguyen, Khoa A. Sumfest, Jill Ashcraft, Kristine C. Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M. J Pers Med Article We compared patient cohorts selected for pharmacogenomic testing using a manual method or automated algorithm in a university-based health insurance network. The medication list was compiled from claims data during 4th quarter 2018. The manual method selected patients by number of medications by the health system’s list of medications for pharmacogenomic testing. The automated method used YouScript’s pharmacogenetic interaction probability (PIP) algorithm to select patients based on the probability that testing would result in detection of one or more clinically significant pharmacogenetic interactions. A total of 6916 patients were included. Patient cohorts selected by each method differed substantially, including size (manual n = 218, automated n = 286) and overlap (n = 41). The automated method was over twice as likely to identify patients where testing may reveal a clinically significant pharmacogenetic interaction than the manual method (62% vs. 29%, p < 0.0001). The manual method captured more patients with significant drug–drug or multi-drug interactions (80.3% vs. 40.2%, respectively, p < 0.0001), higher average number of significant drug interactions per patient (3.3 vs. 1.1, p < 0.0001), and higher average number of unique medications per patient (9.8 vs. 7.4, p < 0.0001). It is possible to identify a cohort of patients who would likely benefit from pharmacogenomic testing using manual or automated methods. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8878761/ /pubmed/35207649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020161 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grande, Kendra J. Dalton, Rachel Moyer, Nicolas A. Arwood, Meghan J. Nguyen, Khoa A. Sumfest, Jill Ashcraft, Kristine C. Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M. Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title | Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title_full | Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title_fullStr | Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title_short | Assessment of a Manual Method versus an Automated, Probability-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients at High Risk for Pharmacogenomic Adverse Drug Outcomes in a University-Based Health Insurance Program |
title_sort | assessment of a manual method versus an automated, probability-based algorithm to identify patients at high risk for pharmacogenomic adverse drug outcomes in a university-based health insurance program |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grandekendraj assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT daltonrachel assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT moyernicolasa assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT arwoodmeghanj assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT nguyenkhoaa assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT sumfestjill assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT ashcraftkristinec assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram AT cooperdehoffrhondam assessmentofamanualmethodversusanautomatedprobabilitybasedalgorithmtoidentifypatientsathighriskforpharmacogenomicadversedrugoutcomesinauniversitybasedhealthinsuranceprogram |