Cargando…

Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation

Objective. To assess the effects of brain neurostimulation (i.e., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Methods. Systematic literature searches were conducted in four electronic databases (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speyer, Renée, Sutt, Anna-Liisa, Bergström, Liza, Hamdy, Shaheen, Pommée, Timothy, Balaguer, Mathieu, Kaale, Anett, Cordier, Reinie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040993
_version_ 1784658751350898688
author Speyer, Renée
Sutt, Anna-Liisa
Bergström, Liza
Hamdy, Shaheen
Pommée, Timothy
Balaguer, Mathieu
Kaale, Anett
Cordier, Reinie
author_facet Speyer, Renée
Sutt, Anna-Liisa
Bergström, Liza
Hamdy, Shaheen
Pommée, Timothy
Balaguer, Mathieu
Kaale, Anett
Cordier, Reinie
author_sort Speyer, Renée
collection PubMed
description Objective. To assess the effects of brain neurostimulation (i.e., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Methods. Systematic literature searches were conducted in four electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed) to retrieve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only. Using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2), the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, after which meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results. In total, 24 studies reporting on brain neurostimulation were included: 11 studies on rTMS, 9 studies on tDCS, and 4 studies on combined neurostimulation interventions. Overall, within-group meta-analysis and between-group analysis for rTMS identified significant large and small effects in favour of stimulation, respectively. For tDCS, overall within-group analysis and between-group analysis identified significant large and moderate effects in favour of stimulation, respectively. Conclusion. Both rTMS and tDCS show promising effects in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. However, comparisons between studies were challenging due to high heterogeneity in stimulation protocols and experimental parameters, potential moderators, and inconsistent methodological reporting. Generalisations of meta-analyses need to be interpreted with care. Future research should include large RCTs using standard protocols and reporting guidelines as achieved by international consensus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88788202022-02-26 Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation Speyer, Renée Sutt, Anna-Liisa Bergström, Liza Hamdy, Shaheen Pommée, Timothy Balaguer, Mathieu Kaale, Anett Cordier, Reinie J Clin Med Review Objective. To assess the effects of brain neurostimulation (i.e., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Methods. Systematic literature searches were conducted in four electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed) to retrieve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only. Using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2), the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, after which meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results. In total, 24 studies reporting on brain neurostimulation were included: 11 studies on rTMS, 9 studies on tDCS, and 4 studies on combined neurostimulation interventions. Overall, within-group meta-analysis and between-group analysis for rTMS identified significant large and small effects in favour of stimulation, respectively. For tDCS, overall within-group analysis and between-group analysis identified significant large and moderate effects in favour of stimulation, respectively. Conclusion. Both rTMS and tDCS show promising effects in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. However, comparisons between studies were challenging due to high heterogeneity in stimulation protocols and experimental parameters, potential moderators, and inconsistent methodological reporting. Generalisations of meta-analyses need to be interpreted with care. Future research should include large RCTs using standard protocols and reporting guidelines as achieved by international consensus. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8878820/ /pubmed/35207265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040993 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Speyer, Renée
Sutt, Anna-Liisa
Bergström, Liza
Hamdy, Shaheen
Pommée, Timothy
Balaguer, Mathieu
Kaale, Anett
Cordier, Reinie
Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title_full Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title_fullStr Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title_full_unstemmed Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title_short Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
title_sort neurostimulation in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials—part ii: brain neurostimulation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040993
work_keys_str_mv AT speyerrenee neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT suttannaliisa neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT bergstromliza neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT hamdyshaheen neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT pommeetimothy neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT balaguermathieu neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT kaaleanett neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation
AT cordierreinie neurostimulationinpeoplewithoropharyngealdysphagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialspartiibrainneurostimulation