Cargando…

In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health

While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced Lactobacillaceae strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available Lactobacillaceae genomes us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Happel, Anna-Ursula, Kullin, Brian R., Gamieldien, Hoyam, Jaspan, Heather B., Varsani, Arvind, Martin, Darren, Passmore, Jo-Ann S., Froissart, Rémy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208669
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020214
_version_ 1784658821974589440
author Happel, Anna-Ursula
Kullin, Brian R.
Gamieldien, Hoyam
Jaspan, Heather B.
Varsani, Arvind
Martin, Darren
Passmore, Jo-Ann S.
Froissart, Rémy
author_facet Happel, Anna-Ursula
Kullin, Brian R.
Gamieldien, Hoyam
Jaspan, Heather B.
Varsani, Arvind
Martin, Darren
Passmore, Jo-Ann S.
Froissart, Rémy
author_sort Happel, Anna-Ursula
collection PubMed
description While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced Lactobacillaceae strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available Lactobacillaceae genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with >80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial Lactobacillaceae isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the Siphoviridae or Myoviridae families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while Lactobacillaceae prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of Lactobacillaceae prophages in live biotherapeutics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8879116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88791162022-02-26 In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health Happel, Anna-Ursula Kullin, Brian R. Gamieldien, Hoyam Jaspan, Heather B. Varsani, Arvind Martin, Darren Passmore, Jo-Ann S. Froissart, Rémy Microorganisms Article While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced Lactobacillaceae strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available Lactobacillaceae genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with >80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial Lactobacillaceae isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the Siphoviridae or Myoviridae families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while Lactobacillaceae prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of Lactobacillaceae prophages in live biotherapeutics. MDPI 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8879116/ /pubmed/35208669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020214 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Happel, Anna-Ursula
Kullin, Brian R.
Gamieldien, Hoyam
Jaspan, Heather B.
Varsani, Arvind
Martin, Darren
Passmore, Jo-Ann S.
Froissart, Rémy
In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title_full In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title_fullStr In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title_full_unstemmed In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title_short In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
title_sort in silico characterisation of putative prophages in lactobacillaceae used in probiotics for vaginal health
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208669
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020214
work_keys_str_mv AT happelannaursula insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT kullinbrianr insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT gamieldienhoyam insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT jaspanheatherb insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT varsaniarvind insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT martindarren insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT passmorejoanns insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth
AT froissartremy insilicocharacterisationofputativeprophagesinlactobacillaceaeusedinprobioticsforvaginalhealth