Cargando…

Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials

The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renner, Olga, Mayer, Mascha, Leischner, Christian, Burkard, Markus, Berger, Alexander, Lauer, Ulrich M., Venturelli, Sascha, Bischoff, Stephan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144
_version_ 1784658857089302528
author Renner, Olga
Mayer, Mascha
Leischner, Christian
Burkard, Markus
Berger, Alexander
Lauer, Ulrich M.
Venturelli, Sascha
Bischoff, Stephan C.
author_facet Renner, Olga
Mayer, Mascha
Leischner, Christian
Burkard, Markus
Berger, Alexander
Lauer, Ulrich M.
Venturelli, Sascha
Bischoff, Stephan C.
author_sort Renner, Olga
collection PubMed
description The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effectiveness of oral gossypol/AT-101 in treating various types of cancer. The databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were examined. Phase I and II trials as well as single arm and randomized trials were included in this review. Results were screened to determine if they met inclusion criteria and then summarized using a narrative approach. A total of 17 trials involving 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, orally applied gossypol/AT-101 at low doses (30 mg daily or lower) was determined as well tolerable either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo-radiation. Adverse events should be strictly monitored and were successfully managed by dose-reduction or treating symptoms. There are four randomized trials, two performed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, one in subjects with head and neck cancer, and one in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thereby, standard chemotherapy (either docetaxel (two trials) or docetaxel plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus prednisone) was tested with and without AT-101. Within these trials, a potential benefit was observed in high-risk patients or in some patients with prolongation in progression-free survival or in overall survival. Strikingly, the most recent clinical trial combined low dose AT-101 with docetaxel, fluorouracil, and radiation, achieving complete responses in 11 of 13 patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma (median duration of 12 months) and a median progression-free survival of 52 months. The promising results shown in subsets of patients supports the need of further specification of AT-101 sensitive cancers as well as for the establishment of effective AT-101-based therapy. In addition, the lowest recommended dose of gossypol and its precise toxicity profile need to be confirmed in further studies. Randomized placebo-controlled trials should be performed to validate these data in large cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8879263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88792632022-02-26 Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials Renner, Olga Mayer, Mascha Leischner, Christian Burkard, Markus Berger, Alexander Lauer, Ulrich M. Venturelli, Sascha Bischoff, Stephan C. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Systematic Review The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effectiveness of oral gossypol/AT-101 in treating various types of cancer. The databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were examined. Phase I and II trials as well as single arm and randomized trials were included in this review. Results were screened to determine if they met inclusion criteria and then summarized using a narrative approach. A total of 17 trials involving 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, orally applied gossypol/AT-101 at low doses (30 mg daily or lower) was determined as well tolerable either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo-radiation. Adverse events should be strictly monitored and were successfully managed by dose-reduction or treating symptoms. There are four randomized trials, two performed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, one in subjects with head and neck cancer, and one in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thereby, standard chemotherapy (either docetaxel (two trials) or docetaxel plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus prednisone) was tested with and without AT-101. Within these trials, a potential benefit was observed in high-risk patients or in some patients with prolongation in progression-free survival or in overall survival. Strikingly, the most recent clinical trial combined low dose AT-101 with docetaxel, fluorouracil, and radiation, achieving complete responses in 11 of 13 patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma (median duration of 12 months) and a median progression-free survival of 52 months. The promising results shown in subsets of patients supports the need of further specification of AT-101 sensitive cancers as well as for the establishment of effective AT-101-based therapy. In addition, the lowest recommended dose of gossypol and its precise toxicity profile need to be confirmed in further studies. Randomized placebo-controlled trials should be performed to validate these data in large cohorts. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8879263/ /pubmed/35215257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Renner, Olga
Mayer, Mascha
Leischner, Christian
Burkard, Markus
Berger, Alexander
Lauer, Ulrich M.
Venturelli, Sascha
Bischoff, Stephan C.
Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title_full Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title_short Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
title_sort systematic review of gossypol/at-101 in cancer clinical trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144
work_keys_str_mv AT rennerolga systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT mayermascha systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT leischnerchristian systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT burkardmarkus systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT bergeralexander systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT lauerulrichm systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT venturellisascha systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials
AT bischoffstephanc systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials