Cargando…
Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144 |
_version_ | 1784658857089302528 |
---|---|
author | Renner, Olga Mayer, Mascha Leischner, Christian Burkard, Markus Berger, Alexander Lauer, Ulrich M. Venturelli, Sascha Bischoff, Stephan C. |
author_facet | Renner, Olga Mayer, Mascha Leischner, Christian Burkard, Markus Berger, Alexander Lauer, Ulrich M. Venturelli, Sascha Bischoff, Stephan C. |
author_sort | Renner, Olga |
collection | PubMed |
description | The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effectiveness of oral gossypol/AT-101 in treating various types of cancer. The databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were examined. Phase I and II trials as well as single arm and randomized trials were included in this review. Results were screened to determine if they met inclusion criteria and then summarized using a narrative approach. A total of 17 trials involving 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, orally applied gossypol/AT-101 at low doses (30 mg daily or lower) was determined as well tolerable either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo-radiation. Adverse events should be strictly monitored and were successfully managed by dose-reduction or treating symptoms. There are four randomized trials, two performed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, one in subjects with head and neck cancer, and one in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thereby, standard chemotherapy (either docetaxel (two trials) or docetaxel plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus prednisone) was tested with and without AT-101. Within these trials, a potential benefit was observed in high-risk patients or in some patients with prolongation in progression-free survival or in overall survival. Strikingly, the most recent clinical trial combined low dose AT-101 with docetaxel, fluorouracil, and radiation, achieving complete responses in 11 of 13 patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma (median duration of 12 months) and a median progression-free survival of 52 months. The promising results shown in subsets of patients supports the need of further specification of AT-101 sensitive cancers as well as for the establishment of effective AT-101-based therapy. In addition, the lowest recommended dose of gossypol and its precise toxicity profile need to be confirmed in further studies. Randomized placebo-controlled trials should be performed to validate these data in large cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8879263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88792632022-02-26 Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials Renner, Olga Mayer, Mascha Leischner, Christian Burkard, Markus Berger, Alexander Lauer, Ulrich M. Venturelli, Sascha Bischoff, Stephan C. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Systematic Review The potential of gossypol and of its R-(−)-enantiomer (R-(−)-gossypol acetic acid, AT-101), has been evaluated for treatment of cancer as an independent agent and in combination with standard chemo-radiation-therapies, respectively. This review assesses the evidence for safety and clinical effectiveness of oral gossypol/AT-101 in treating various types of cancer. The databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were examined. Phase I and II trials as well as single arm and randomized trials were included in this review. Results were screened to determine if they met inclusion criteria and then summarized using a narrative approach. A total of 17 trials involving 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, orally applied gossypol/AT-101 at low doses (30 mg daily or lower) was determined as well tolerable either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo-radiation. Adverse events should be strictly monitored and were successfully managed by dose-reduction or treating symptoms. There are four randomized trials, two performed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, one in subjects with head and neck cancer, and one in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thereby, standard chemotherapy (either docetaxel (two trials) or docetaxel plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus prednisone) was tested with and without AT-101. Within these trials, a potential benefit was observed in high-risk patients or in some patients with prolongation in progression-free survival or in overall survival. Strikingly, the most recent clinical trial combined low dose AT-101 with docetaxel, fluorouracil, and radiation, achieving complete responses in 11 of 13 patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma (median duration of 12 months) and a median progression-free survival of 52 months. The promising results shown in subsets of patients supports the need of further specification of AT-101 sensitive cancers as well as for the establishment of effective AT-101-based therapy. In addition, the lowest recommended dose of gossypol and its precise toxicity profile need to be confirmed in further studies. Randomized placebo-controlled trials should be performed to validate these data in large cohorts. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8879263/ /pubmed/35215257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Renner, Olga Mayer, Mascha Leischner, Christian Burkard, Markus Berger, Alexander Lauer, Ulrich M. Venturelli, Sascha Bischoff, Stephan C. Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title | Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_full | Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_short | Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_sort | systematic review of gossypol/at-101 in cancer clinical trials |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rennerolga systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT mayermascha systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT leischnerchristian systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT burkardmarkus systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT bergeralexander systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT lauerulrichm systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT venturellisascha systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials AT bischoffstephanc systematicreviewofgossypolat101incancerclinicaltrials |