Cargando…

Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review

The process of clinical pharmacogenetics implementation depends on patients’ and general population’s perceptions. To date, no study has been published addressing Spanish patients’ opinions on pharmacogenetic testing, the availability of the results, and the need for signing informed consent. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubiaur, Pablo, Prósper-Cuesta, David Nicolás, Novalbos, Jesús, Mejía-Abril, Gina, Navares-Gómez, Marcos, Villapalos-García, Gonzalo, Soria-Chacartegui, Paula, Abad-Santos, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020270
_version_ 1784658916047585280
author Zubiaur, Pablo
Prósper-Cuesta, David Nicolás
Novalbos, Jesús
Mejía-Abril, Gina
Navares-Gómez, Marcos
Villapalos-García, Gonzalo
Soria-Chacartegui, Paula
Abad-Santos, Francisco
author_facet Zubiaur, Pablo
Prósper-Cuesta, David Nicolás
Novalbos, Jesús
Mejía-Abril, Gina
Navares-Gómez, Marcos
Villapalos-García, Gonzalo
Soria-Chacartegui, Paula
Abad-Santos, Francisco
author_sort Zubiaur, Pablo
collection PubMed
description The process of clinical pharmacogenetics implementation depends on patients’ and general population’s perceptions. To date, no study has been published addressing Spanish patients’ opinions on pharmacogenetic testing, the availability of the results, and the need for signing informed consent. In this work, we contacted 146 patients that had been previously genotyped at our laboratory and 46 healthy volunteers that had participated in a bioequivalence clinical trial at the Clinical Pharmacology Department of Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and consented to pharmacogenetic testing for research purposes. From the latter, 108 and 34, respectively, responded to the questionnaire (i.e., a response rate of 74%); Participants were scheduled for a face-to-face, telephone, or videoconference interview and were asked a total of 27 questions in Spanish. Great or almost complete acceptance of pharmacogenetic testing was observed (99.3%), age and university education level being the main predictors of acceptance rates and understanding (multivariate analysis, p = 0.004, R(2) = 0.17, age being inversely proportional to acceptance rates and understanding and university level being related to higher acceptance rates and understanding compared to other education levels). Mixed perceptions were observed on the requirement of written informed consent (55.6% in favor); therefore, it seems recommendable to continue requesting it for the upcoming years until more perceptions are collected. The majority of participants (95.8%) preferred storing pharmacogenetic results in medical records rather than in electronic sources (55.6%) and highly agreed with the possibility of carrying their results on a portable card (91.5%). Patients agreed to broad genetic testing, including biomarkers unrelated to their disease (93.7%) or with little clinically relevant evidence (94.4%). Patients apparently rely on clinician’s or pharmacogeneticist’s interpretation and seem, therefore, open to the generation of ethically challenging information. Finally, although most patients (68.3%) agreed with universal population testing, some were reluctant, probably due to the related costs and sustainability of the Spanish Health System. This was especially evident in the group of patients who were older and with a likely higher proportion of pensioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8879541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88795412022-02-26 Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review Zubiaur, Pablo Prósper-Cuesta, David Nicolás Novalbos, Jesús Mejía-Abril, Gina Navares-Gómez, Marcos Villapalos-García, Gonzalo Soria-Chacartegui, Paula Abad-Santos, Francisco J Pers Med Article The process of clinical pharmacogenetics implementation depends on patients’ and general population’s perceptions. To date, no study has been published addressing Spanish patients’ opinions on pharmacogenetic testing, the availability of the results, and the need for signing informed consent. In this work, we contacted 146 patients that had been previously genotyped at our laboratory and 46 healthy volunteers that had participated in a bioequivalence clinical trial at the Clinical Pharmacology Department of Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and consented to pharmacogenetic testing for research purposes. From the latter, 108 and 34, respectively, responded to the questionnaire (i.e., a response rate of 74%); Participants were scheduled for a face-to-face, telephone, or videoconference interview and were asked a total of 27 questions in Spanish. Great or almost complete acceptance of pharmacogenetic testing was observed (99.3%), age and university education level being the main predictors of acceptance rates and understanding (multivariate analysis, p = 0.004, R(2) = 0.17, age being inversely proportional to acceptance rates and understanding and university level being related to higher acceptance rates and understanding compared to other education levels). Mixed perceptions were observed on the requirement of written informed consent (55.6% in favor); therefore, it seems recommendable to continue requesting it for the upcoming years until more perceptions are collected. The majority of participants (95.8%) preferred storing pharmacogenetic results in medical records rather than in electronic sources (55.6%) and highly agreed with the possibility of carrying their results on a portable card (91.5%). Patients agreed to broad genetic testing, including biomarkers unrelated to their disease (93.7%) or with little clinically relevant evidence (94.4%). Patients apparently rely on clinician’s or pharmacogeneticist’s interpretation and seem, therefore, open to the generation of ethically challenging information. Finally, although most patients (68.3%) agreed with universal population testing, some were reluctant, probably due to the related costs and sustainability of the Spanish Health System. This was especially evident in the group of patients who were older and with a likely higher proportion of pensioners. MDPI 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8879541/ /pubmed/35207758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020270 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zubiaur, Pablo
Prósper-Cuesta, David Nicolás
Novalbos, Jesús
Mejía-Abril, Gina
Navares-Gómez, Marcos
Villapalos-García, Gonzalo
Soria-Chacartegui, Paula
Abad-Santos, Francisco
Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title_full Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title_short Patients’ Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review
title_sort patients’ perceptions of pharmacogenetic testing and access to their results: state of the art in spain and systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020270
work_keys_str_mv AT zubiaurpablo patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT prospercuestadavidnicolas patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT novalbosjesus patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT mejiaabrilgina patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT navaresgomezmarcos patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT villapalosgarciagonzalo patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT soriachacarteguipaula patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview
AT abadsantosfrancisco patientsperceptionsofpharmacogenetictestingandaccesstotheirresultsstateoftheartinspainandsystematicreview