Cargando…

Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of prosthetic screws after applying cyclic loadings in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation model with the OT Bridge system. The model was tested both with and without anterior screws. Four implant analogues following the “all-on-four” concept were inse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pozzan, Mario Cesare, Grande, Francesco, Mochi Zamperoli, Edoardo, Tesini, Fabio, Carossa, Massimo, Catapano, Santo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041582
_version_ 1784658961563123712
author Pozzan, Mario Cesare
Grande, Francesco
Mochi Zamperoli, Edoardo
Tesini, Fabio
Carossa, Massimo
Catapano, Santo
author_facet Pozzan, Mario Cesare
Grande, Francesco
Mochi Zamperoli, Edoardo
Tesini, Fabio
Carossa, Massimo
Catapano, Santo
author_sort Pozzan, Mario Cesare
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of prosthetic screws after applying cyclic loadings in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation model with the OT Bridge system. The model was tested both with and without anterior screws. Four implant analogues following the “all-on-four” concept were inserted in an edentulous mandibular resin model. An OT Bridge system with a Cr–Co prosthetic framework was fabricated. Depending on the presence or absence of one or two anterior screws on the implant analogues, three groups were created, i.e., Gr.1: three tightening screws, Gr.2: two tightening screws, Control Group: four tightening screws. Each single group underwent subsequent 400,000 cyclic loads, simulating approximately a year of chewing by using a dynamometer machine. This cycle was repeated five times for each group, and preload loss values were evaluated on each prosthetic screw after each cycle. All the data obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test. No statistically significant differences after intragroup analysis were found. A statistically significant difference within the Gr.1 between the screws in positions 33 and 36, equal to 15.2% (p-value = 0.0176), was found. The OT Bridge seems a useful system to maintain the retention of a prosthesis during mechanical stress conditions even in the absence of one screw in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation. This could represent a good solution to solve the esthetic problem of the screw buccal access hole for fixed solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8879715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88797152022-02-26 Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws Pozzan, Mario Cesare Grande, Francesco Mochi Zamperoli, Edoardo Tesini, Fabio Carossa, Massimo Catapano, Santo Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of prosthetic screws after applying cyclic loadings in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation model with the OT Bridge system. The model was tested both with and without anterior screws. Four implant analogues following the “all-on-four” concept were inserted in an edentulous mandibular resin model. An OT Bridge system with a Cr–Co prosthetic framework was fabricated. Depending on the presence or absence of one or two anterior screws on the implant analogues, three groups were created, i.e., Gr.1: three tightening screws, Gr.2: two tightening screws, Control Group: four tightening screws. Each single group underwent subsequent 400,000 cyclic loads, simulating approximately a year of chewing by using a dynamometer machine. This cycle was repeated five times for each group, and preload loss values were evaluated on each prosthetic screw after each cycle. All the data obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test. No statistically significant differences after intragroup analysis were found. A statistically significant difference within the Gr.1 between the screws in positions 33 and 36, equal to 15.2% (p-value = 0.0176), was found. The OT Bridge seems a useful system to maintain the retention of a prosthesis during mechanical stress conditions even in the absence of one screw in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation. This could represent a good solution to solve the esthetic problem of the screw buccal access hole for fixed solutions. MDPI 2022-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8879715/ /pubmed/35208121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041582 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pozzan, Mario Cesare
Grande, Francesco
Mochi Zamperoli, Edoardo
Tesini, Fabio
Carossa, Massimo
Catapano, Santo
Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title_full Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title_fullStr Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title_short Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an “All-on-Four” Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws
title_sort assessment of preload loss after cyclic loading in the ot bridge system in an “all-on-four” rehabilitation model in the absence of one and two prosthesis screws
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041582
work_keys_str_mv AT pozzanmariocesare assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews
AT grandefrancesco assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews
AT mochizamperoliedoardo assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews
AT tesinifabio assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews
AT carossamassimo assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews
AT catapanosanto assessmentofpreloadlossaftercyclicloadingintheotbridgesysteminanallonfourrehabilitationmodelintheabsenceofoneandtwoprosthesisscrews