Cargando…

Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020

Terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species has emerged and appears to be increasing. A new EUCAST susceptibility testing method and tentative ECOFFs were recently proposed for Trichophyton. Terbinafine resistance and target gene mutations were detected in 16 Danish isolates in 2013–2018. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen, Hare, Rasmus Krøger, Jørgensen, Karin Meinike, Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt, Thomsen, Philip Kjettinge, Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020150
_version_ 1784658963595264000
author Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Hare, Rasmus Krøger
Jørgensen, Karin Meinike
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
Thomsen, Philip Kjettinge
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
author_facet Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Hare, Rasmus Krøger
Jørgensen, Karin Meinike
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
Thomsen, Philip Kjettinge
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
author_sort Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
collection PubMed
description Terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species has emerged and appears to be increasing. A new EUCAST susceptibility testing method and tentative ECOFFs were recently proposed for Trichophyton. Terbinafine resistance and target gene mutations were detected in 16 Danish isolates in 2013–2018. In this study, samples/isolates submitted for dermatophyte susceptibility testing 2019–2020 were examined. Species identification (ITS sequencing for T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale species complex (SC) isolates), EUCAST MICs and squalene epoxidase (SQLE) profiles were obtained. Sixty-three isolates from 59 patients were included. T. rubrum accounted for 81% and T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale SC for 19%. Approximately 60% of T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes/interdigitale SC isolates were terbinafine non-wildtype and/or had known/novel SQLE mutations with possible implications for terbinafine MICs. All infections with terbinafine-resistant T. mentagrophytes/interdigitale SC isolates were caused by Trichophyton indotineae. Compared to 2013–2018, the number of patients with terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton isolates increased. For T. rubrum, this is partly explained by an increase in number of requests for susceptibility testing. Terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae was first detected in 2018, but accounted for 19% of resistance (4 of 21 patients) in 2020. In conclusion, terbinafine resistance is an emerging problem in Denmark. Population based studies are warranted and susceptibility testing is highly relevant in non-responding cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8879722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88797222022-02-26 Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020 Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen Hare, Rasmus Krøger Jørgensen, Karin Meinike Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt Thomsen, Philip Kjettinge Arendrup, Maiken Cavling J Fungi (Basel) Article Terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species has emerged and appears to be increasing. A new EUCAST susceptibility testing method and tentative ECOFFs were recently proposed for Trichophyton. Terbinafine resistance and target gene mutations were detected in 16 Danish isolates in 2013–2018. In this study, samples/isolates submitted for dermatophyte susceptibility testing 2019–2020 were examined. Species identification (ITS sequencing for T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale species complex (SC) isolates), EUCAST MICs and squalene epoxidase (SQLE) profiles were obtained. Sixty-three isolates from 59 patients were included. T. rubrum accounted for 81% and T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale SC for 19%. Approximately 60% of T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes/interdigitale SC isolates were terbinafine non-wildtype and/or had known/novel SQLE mutations with possible implications for terbinafine MICs. All infections with terbinafine-resistant T. mentagrophytes/interdigitale SC isolates were caused by Trichophyton indotineae. Compared to 2013–2018, the number of patients with terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton isolates increased. For T. rubrum, this is partly explained by an increase in number of requests for susceptibility testing. Terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae was first detected in 2018, but accounted for 19% of resistance (4 of 21 patients) in 2020. In conclusion, terbinafine resistance is an emerging problem in Denmark. Population based studies are warranted and susceptibility testing is highly relevant in non-responding cases. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8879722/ /pubmed/35205904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020150 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Hare, Rasmus Krøger
Jørgensen, Karin Meinike
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
Thomsen, Philip Kjettinge
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title_full Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title_fullStr Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title_short Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020
title_sort increasing terbinafine resistance in danish trichophyton isolates 2019–2020
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8879722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020150
work_keys_str_mv AT astvadkarenmariethyssen increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020
AT harerasmuskrøger increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020
AT jørgensenkarinmeinike increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020
AT sauntedittemarielindhardt increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020
AT thomsenphilipkjettinge increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020
AT arendrupmaikencavling increasingterbinafineresistanceindanishtrichophytonisolates20192020