Cargando…
Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 |
_version_ | 1784659207886209024 |
---|---|
author | Pérez-González, Alexandre Suárez-García, Inés Ocampo, Antonio Poveda, Eva |
author_facet | Pérez-González, Alexandre Suárez-García, Inés Ocampo, Antonio Poveda, Eva |
author_sort | Pérez-González, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug–drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8880461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88804612022-02-26 Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges Pérez-González, Alexandre Suárez-García, Inés Ocampo, Antonio Poveda, Eva Microorganisms Review During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug–drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8880461/ /pubmed/35208887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Pérez-González, Alexandre Suárez-García, Inés Ocampo, Antonio Poveda, Eva Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title_full | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title_fullStr | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title_short | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges |
title_sort | two-drug regimens for hiv—current evidence, research gaps and future challenges |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezgonzalezalexandre twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges AT suarezgarciaines twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges AT ocampoantonio twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges AT povedaeva twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges |