Cargando…

Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges

During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-González, Alexandre, Suárez-García, Inés, Ocampo, Antonio, Poveda, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433
_version_ 1784659207886209024
author Pérez-González, Alexandre
Suárez-García, Inés
Ocampo, Antonio
Poveda, Eva
author_facet Pérez-González, Alexandre
Suárez-García, Inés
Ocampo, Antonio
Poveda, Eva
author_sort Pérez-González, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug–drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8880461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88804612022-02-26 Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges Pérez-González, Alexandre Suárez-García, Inés Ocampo, Antonio Poveda, Eva Microorganisms Review During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug–drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8880461/ /pubmed/35208887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pérez-González, Alexandre
Suárez-García, Inés
Ocampo, Antonio
Poveda, Eva
Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title_full Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title_fullStr Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title_short Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
title_sort two-drug regimens for hiv—current evidence, research gaps and future challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433
work_keys_str_mv AT perezgonzalezalexandre twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges
AT suarezgarciaines twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges
AT ocampoantonio twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges
AT povedaeva twodrugregimensforhivcurrentevidenceresearchgapsandfuturechallenges