Cargando…

In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections

The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarz, Patrick, Nikolskiy, Ilya, Bidaud, Anne-Laure, Sommer, Frank, Bange, Gert, Dannaoui, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115
_version_ 1784659208849850368
author Schwarz, Patrick
Nikolskiy, Ilya
Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Sommer, Frank
Bange, Gert
Dannaoui, Eric
author_facet Schwarz, Patrick
Nikolskiy, Ilya
Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Sommer, Frank
Bange, Gert
Dannaoui, Eric
author_sort Schwarz, Patrick
collection PubMed
description The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tropicalis), 29 Aspergillus species (five Aspergillus flavus, 10 Aspergillus fumigatus, four Aspergillus nidulans, five Aspergillus niger, and five Aspergillus terreus), and 10 Rhizopus species (seven Rhizopus arrhizus, one Rhizopus delemar and two Rhizopus microsporus) strains. For the determination of the interaction, a microdilution checkerboard technique based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing was used. Results of the checkerboard technique were evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) based on the Loewe additivity model for all isolates. Different inhibition endpoints were used to capture both the interaction at MIC and sub-MIC levels. Additionally, checkerboard technique results for Candida species were evaluated by response surface analysis based on the Bliss independence model. Against common Candida species, the combination was synergistic for 75% of the strains by FICI and for 66% of the strains by response surface analysis. For C. tropicalis, the interaction was antagonistic for three isolates by FICI, but antagonism was not confirmed by response surface analysis. Interestingly, synergistic and antagonistic FICIs were simultaneously present on checkboard microplates of all three strains. Against C. auris the combination was synergistic for 73% of the strains by response surface analysis and for 33% of the strains by FICI. This discrepancy could be related to the insensitivity of the FICI to detect weak interactions. Interaction for all other strains was indifferent. For Aspergillus and Rhizopus species combination exhibited only indifferent interactions against all tested strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8880464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88804642022-02-26 In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections Schwarz, Patrick Nikolskiy, Ilya Bidaud, Anne-Laure Sommer, Frank Bange, Gert Dannaoui, Eric J Fungi (Basel) Article The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tropicalis), 29 Aspergillus species (five Aspergillus flavus, 10 Aspergillus fumigatus, four Aspergillus nidulans, five Aspergillus niger, and five Aspergillus terreus), and 10 Rhizopus species (seven Rhizopus arrhizus, one Rhizopus delemar and two Rhizopus microsporus) strains. For the determination of the interaction, a microdilution checkerboard technique based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing was used. Results of the checkerboard technique were evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) based on the Loewe additivity model for all isolates. Different inhibition endpoints were used to capture both the interaction at MIC and sub-MIC levels. Additionally, checkerboard technique results for Candida species were evaluated by response surface analysis based on the Bliss independence model. Against common Candida species, the combination was synergistic for 75% of the strains by FICI and for 66% of the strains by response surface analysis. For C. tropicalis, the interaction was antagonistic for three isolates by FICI, but antagonism was not confirmed by response surface analysis. Interestingly, synergistic and antagonistic FICIs were simultaneously present on checkboard microplates of all three strains. Against C. auris the combination was synergistic for 73% of the strains by response surface analysis and for 33% of the strains by FICI. This discrepancy could be related to the insensitivity of the FICI to detect weak interactions. Interaction for all other strains was indifferent. For Aspergillus and Rhizopus species combination exhibited only indifferent interactions against all tested strains. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8880464/ /pubmed/35205869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schwarz, Patrick
Nikolskiy, Ilya
Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Sommer, Frank
Bange, Gert
Dannaoui, Eric
In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title_full In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title_fullStr In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title_short In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
title_sort in vitro activity of amphotericin b in combination with colistin against fungi responsible for invasive infections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarzpatrick invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections
AT nikolskiyilya invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections
AT bidaudannelaure invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections
AT sommerfrank invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections
AT bangegert invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections
AT dannaouieric invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections