Cargando…
In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections
The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115 |
_version_ | 1784659208849850368 |
---|---|
author | Schwarz, Patrick Nikolskiy, Ilya Bidaud, Anne-Laure Sommer, Frank Bange, Gert Dannaoui, Eric |
author_facet | Schwarz, Patrick Nikolskiy, Ilya Bidaud, Anne-Laure Sommer, Frank Bange, Gert Dannaoui, Eric |
author_sort | Schwarz, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tropicalis), 29 Aspergillus species (five Aspergillus flavus, 10 Aspergillus fumigatus, four Aspergillus nidulans, five Aspergillus niger, and five Aspergillus terreus), and 10 Rhizopus species (seven Rhizopus arrhizus, one Rhizopus delemar and two Rhizopus microsporus) strains. For the determination of the interaction, a microdilution checkerboard technique based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing was used. Results of the checkerboard technique were evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) based on the Loewe additivity model for all isolates. Different inhibition endpoints were used to capture both the interaction at MIC and sub-MIC levels. Additionally, checkerboard technique results for Candida species were evaluated by response surface analysis based on the Bliss independence model. Against common Candida species, the combination was synergistic for 75% of the strains by FICI and for 66% of the strains by response surface analysis. For C. tropicalis, the interaction was antagonistic for three isolates by FICI, but antagonism was not confirmed by response surface analysis. Interestingly, synergistic and antagonistic FICIs were simultaneously present on checkboard microplates of all three strains. Against C. auris the combination was synergistic for 73% of the strains by response surface analysis and for 33% of the strains by FICI. This discrepancy could be related to the insensitivity of the FICI to detect weak interactions. Interaction for all other strains was indifferent. For Aspergillus and Rhizopus species combination exhibited only indifferent interactions against all tested strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8880464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88804642022-02-26 In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections Schwarz, Patrick Nikolskiy, Ilya Bidaud, Anne-Laure Sommer, Frank Bange, Gert Dannaoui, Eric J Fungi (Basel) Article The in vitro interaction of amphotericin B in combination with colistin was evaluated against a total of 86 strains comprising of 47 Candida species (10 Candida albicans, 15 Candida auris, five Candida glabrata, three Candida kefyr, five Candida krusei, four Candida parapsilosis and five Candida tropicalis), 29 Aspergillus species (five Aspergillus flavus, 10 Aspergillus fumigatus, four Aspergillus nidulans, five Aspergillus niger, and five Aspergillus terreus), and 10 Rhizopus species (seven Rhizopus arrhizus, one Rhizopus delemar and two Rhizopus microsporus) strains. For the determination of the interaction, a microdilution checkerboard technique based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing was used. Results of the checkerboard technique were evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) based on the Loewe additivity model for all isolates. Different inhibition endpoints were used to capture both the interaction at MIC and sub-MIC levels. Additionally, checkerboard technique results for Candida species were evaluated by response surface analysis based on the Bliss independence model. Against common Candida species, the combination was synergistic for 75% of the strains by FICI and for 66% of the strains by response surface analysis. For C. tropicalis, the interaction was antagonistic for three isolates by FICI, but antagonism was not confirmed by response surface analysis. Interestingly, synergistic and antagonistic FICIs were simultaneously present on checkboard microplates of all three strains. Against C. auris the combination was synergistic for 73% of the strains by response surface analysis and for 33% of the strains by FICI. This discrepancy could be related to the insensitivity of the FICI to detect weak interactions. Interaction for all other strains was indifferent. For Aspergillus and Rhizopus species combination exhibited only indifferent interactions against all tested strains. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8880464/ /pubmed/35205869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schwarz, Patrick Nikolskiy, Ilya Bidaud, Anne-Laure Sommer, Frank Bange, Gert Dannaoui, Eric In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title | In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title_full | In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title_short | In Vitro Activity of Amphotericin B in Combination with Colistin against Fungi Responsible for Invasive Infections |
title_sort | in vitro activity of amphotericin b in combination with colistin against fungi responsible for invasive infections |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8020115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarzpatrick invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections AT nikolskiyilya invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections AT bidaudannelaure invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections AT sommerfrank invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections AT bangegert invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections AT dannaouieric invitroactivityofamphotericinbincombinationwithcolistinagainstfungiresponsibleforinvasiveinfections |