Cargando…
Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
(1) Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are frequently present in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) is a promising biomarker of OAB, little is known about its role in patients with OAB secondary to POP. The aim of the study was to evaluate u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040971 |
_version_ | 1784659292720201728 |
---|---|
author | Jankiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiewicz, Michał Nowakowski, Łukasz Rechberger, Tomasz Rogowski, Artur Miotla, Pawel |
author_facet | Jankiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiewicz, Michał Nowakowski, Łukasz Rechberger, Tomasz Rogowski, Artur Miotla, Pawel |
author_sort | Jankiewicz, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are frequently present in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) is a promising biomarker of OAB, little is known about its role in patients with OAB secondary to POP. The aim of the study was to evaluate urinary NGF levels in patients with POP involving the anterior vaginal wall and check if it may serve as a predicting factor for postoperative resolution of OAB symptoms. (2) Methods: Eighty-three Caucasian women included in the study were divided into three groups: pure OAB, one associated with POP (POP&OAB) and a control group composed of healthy volunteers. The urine NGF and creatinine were assessed with ELISA tests to calculate the NGF/creatinine ratio. (3) Results: The NGF/creatinine ratio was significantly higher in patients with pure OAB in comparison with other groups; however, it did not differ between the control group and the POP&OAB group. There was no correlation between NGF/creatinine ratio and age, menopausal status, BMI, parity or urodynamic findings. The NGF/creatinine ratio was not a prognostic factor for OAB symptoms’ resolution after surgical treatment of POP. (4) Conclusions: Urinary NGF excretion is not increased in women with OAB secondary to POP; thus, it may not serve as an OAB biomarker in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8880733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88807332022-02-26 Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Jankiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiewicz, Michał Nowakowski, Łukasz Rechberger, Tomasz Rogowski, Artur Miotla, Pawel J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are frequently present in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) is a promising biomarker of OAB, little is known about its role in patients with OAB secondary to POP. The aim of the study was to evaluate urinary NGF levels in patients with POP involving the anterior vaginal wall and check if it may serve as a predicting factor for postoperative resolution of OAB symptoms. (2) Methods: Eighty-three Caucasian women included in the study were divided into three groups: pure OAB, one associated with POP (POP&OAB) and a control group composed of healthy volunteers. The urine NGF and creatinine were assessed with ELISA tests to calculate the NGF/creatinine ratio. (3) Results: The NGF/creatinine ratio was significantly higher in patients with pure OAB in comparison with other groups; however, it did not differ between the control group and the POP&OAB group. There was no correlation between NGF/creatinine ratio and age, menopausal status, BMI, parity or urodynamic findings. The NGF/creatinine ratio was not a prognostic factor for OAB symptoms’ resolution after surgical treatment of POP. (4) Conclusions: Urinary NGF excretion is not increased in women with OAB secondary to POP; thus, it may not serve as an OAB biomarker in these patients. MDPI 2022-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8880733/ /pubmed/35207243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040971 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jankiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiewicz, Michał Nowakowski, Łukasz Rechberger, Tomasz Rogowski, Artur Miotla, Pawel Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title | Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_full | Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_fullStr | Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_short | Urine Nerve Growth Factor May Not Be Useful as a Biomarker of Overactive Bladder in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_sort | urine nerve growth factor may not be useful as a biomarker of overactive bladder in patients with pelvic organ prolapse |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jankiewiczkatarzyna urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse AT bogusiewiczmichał urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse AT nowakowskiłukasz urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse AT rechbergertomasz urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse AT rogowskiartur urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse AT miotlapawel urinenervegrowthfactormaynotbeusefulasabiomarkerofoveractivebladderinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapse |