Cargando…

Knockdown of Serum- and Glucocorticoid-Regulated Kinase 1 Enhances Cisplatin Sensitivity of Gastric Cancer Through Suppressing the Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Signaling Pathway

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have published the promoting effect of serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) in various malignant tumors. However, whether SGK1 promotes gastric cancer remains a mystery. AIMS: To clarify the function of SGK1 in gastric cancer and its potential regulatory me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jishui, Lv, Wenhao, Liu, Yagang, Fu, Weihua, Chen, Baosheng, Ma, Qiutong, Gao, Xin, Cui, Xiuxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Trakya University School of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8880965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34860160
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2021.21114
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous studies have published the promoting effect of serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) in various malignant tumors. However, whether SGK1 promotes gastric cancer remains a mystery. AIMS: To clarify the function of SGK1 in gastric cancer and its potential regulatory mechanism. STUDY DESIGN: Cell culture study. METHODS: The SGK1-silenced model was generated in two gastric cancer cell lines and further evaluated their malignant behavior and susceptibility to cisplatin. The interaction between miR-15a-5p and SGK1 was evaluated by the luciferase reporter assay. The knockdown efficiency of SGK1 was confirmed by RT- qPCR and Western blot assays. Cell proliferation rate was assessed with CCK-8 assay, and flow cytometry was used to determine cell cycle progression and apoptosis. RESULTS: Western blot data displayed an elevated level of SGK1 in gastric cancer cell lines. Functionally, SGK1 deficiency suppressed gastric cancer cell proliferation (P < .01) by acting on cell-cycle progression. Moreover, SGK1 deficiency suppressed cell invasion and migration of gastric cancer cells (P < .01). Further, the silencing of SGK1 obviously suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis of the cells after cisplatin treatment (P < .01), indicating that SGK1 deficiency facilitated the chemosensitivity of these 2 gastric cancer cell lines to cisplatin. Mechanically, downregulation of SGK1 repressed the cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation of NF-κB p65. Interestingly, we found that miR-15a-5p binds to the 3'UTR of SGK1, which was confirmed using luciferase activity assay (P < .05). Moreover, the data suggested that SGK1 reversed the suppression effect of miR-15a-5p on gastric cancer cell migration (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Loss of SGK1 suppresses the malignant behavior of gastric cancer cells and increases cisplatin sensitivity by restraining the NF-κB signaling pathway. Moreover, SGK1 may exert an inhibitory effect in gastric cancer by being targeted by miR-15a-5p. Therefore, SGK1 may be a prospective target for future gastric cancer therapy.