Cargando…

Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory respo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fahmy, Ahmed, Saad, Karim, Sameh, Wael, Elgebaly, Omar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635
_version_ 1784659377604526080
author Fahmy, Ahmed
Saad, Karim
Sameh, Wael
Elgebaly, Omar
author_facet Fahmy, Ahmed
Saad, Karim
Sameh, Wael
Elgebaly, Omar
author_sort Fahmy, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and obstructing kidney stones. We compared the surgical outcomes and complications among those patients who had planned PCNL after control of prior urosepsis with urgent decompression and antibiotics (Group A) to a group who presented for PCNL with no previous history of a septic presentations (Group B). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed using four parameters (age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) to eliminate potential allocation bias. Primary outcomes included were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included were operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients underwent PCNL (48 male and 32 females) divided equally between both treatment groups, with a mean (interquartile range) age of 47 (19–75) years. There were no differences in demographic data or stone characteristics between both groups. Both groups had comparable SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212) and mean operative time (77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728) (Table 2). Patients in Group A had a significantly higher overall complications rate (35% vs 10%, P = 0.03) . There were no postoperative mortalities and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A patients compared to group B (4.2 vs 1.5 days, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: : Planned PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has comparable operative time and SFR but higher complication rates and longer postoperative hospital stay. This is critical in counselling patients prior to definitive treatment of kidney stones after urgent decompression for urosepsis and for adequate preoperative planning and preparation. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; URS; ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8881061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88810612022-02-26 Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications Fahmy, Ahmed Saad, Karim Sameh, Wael Elgebaly, Omar Arab J Urol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and obstructing kidney stones. We compared the surgical outcomes and complications among those patients who had planned PCNL after control of prior urosepsis with urgent decompression and antibiotics (Group A) to a group who presented for PCNL with no previous history of a septic presentations (Group B). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed using four parameters (age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) to eliminate potential allocation bias. Primary outcomes included were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included were operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients underwent PCNL (48 male and 32 females) divided equally between both treatment groups, with a mean (interquartile range) age of 47 (19–75) years. There were no differences in demographic data or stone characteristics between both groups. Both groups had comparable SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212) and mean operative time (77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728) (Table 2). Patients in Group A had a significantly higher overall complications rate (35% vs 10%, P = 0.03) . There were no postoperative mortalities and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A patients compared to group B (4.2 vs 1.5 days, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: : Planned PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has comparable operative time and SFR but higher complication rates and longer postoperative hospital stay. This is critical in counselling patients prior to definitive treatment of kidney stones after urgent decompression for urosepsis and for adequate preoperative planning and preparation. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; URS; ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography Taylor & Francis 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8881061/ /pubmed/35223108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fahmy, Ahmed
Saad, Karim
Sameh, Wael
Elgebaly, Omar
Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title_full Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title_fullStr Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title_full_unstemmed Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title_short Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
title_sort planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: analysis of outcomes and complications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635
work_keys_str_mv AT fahmyahmed plannedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyinpatientswhoinitiallypresentedwithurosepsisanalysisofoutcomesandcomplications
AT saadkarim plannedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyinpatientswhoinitiallypresentedwithurosepsisanalysisofoutcomesandcomplications
AT samehwael plannedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyinpatientswhoinitiallypresentedwithurosepsisanalysisofoutcomesandcomplications
AT elgebalyomar plannedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyinpatientswhoinitiallypresentedwithurosepsisanalysisofoutcomesandcomplications