Cargando…

One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for 90-day mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in adult patients transferred by ambulance to an emergency depa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco, Sanz-García, Ancor, Ortega, Guillermo J., Delgado-Benito, Juan F., García Villena, Eduardo, Mazas Pérez-Oleaga, Cristina, López-Izquierdo, Raúl, Castro Villamor, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2042590
_version_ 1784659379373473792
author Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco
Sanz-García, Ancor
Ortega, Guillermo J.
Delgado-Benito, Juan F.
García Villena, Eduardo
Mazas Pérez-Oleaga, Cristina
López-Izquierdo, Raúl
Castro Villamor, Miguel A.
author_facet Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco
Sanz-García, Ancor
Ortega, Guillermo J.
Delgado-Benito, Juan F.
García Villena, Eduardo
Mazas Pérez-Oleaga, Cristina
López-Izquierdo, Raúl
Castro Villamor, Miguel A.
author_sort Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for 90-day mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in adult patients transferred by ambulance to an emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19 infection subsequently confirmed by a SARS-CoV-2 test (polymerase chain reaction). We collected epidemiological data, clinical covariates (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, level of consciousness and use of supplemental oxygen) and hospital variables. The primary outcome was cumulative all-cause mortality during a 90-day follow-up, with mortality assessment monitoring time points at 1, 2, 7, 14, 30 and 90 days from ED attendance. Comparison of performances for 90-day mortality between both scores was carried out by univariate analysis. RESULTS: From March to November 2020, we included 2,961 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (median age 79 years, IQR 66–88), with 49.2% females. The qCSI score provided an AUC ranging from 0.769 (1-day mortality) to 0.749 (90-day mortality), whereas AUCs for NEWS ranging from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality. At all-time points studied, differences between both scores were statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with SARS-CoV-2 can rapidly develop bilateral pneumonias with multiorgan disease; in these cases, in which an evacuation by the EMS is required, reliable scores for an early identification of patients with risk of clinical deterioration are critical. The NEWS score provides not only better prognostic results than those offered by qCSI at all the analyzed time points, but it is also better suited for COVID-19 patients. KEY MESSAGES: This work aims to determine whether NEWS is the best score for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19. AUCs for NEWS ranged from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality and were significantly higher than those for qCSI in these same outcomes. NEWS provides a better prognostic capacity than the qCSI score and allows for long-term (90 days) mortality risk assessment of COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8881067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88810672022-02-26 One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19 Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco Sanz-García, Ancor Ortega, Guillermo J. Delgado-Benito, Juan F. García Villena, Eduardo Mazas Pérez-Oleaga, Cristina López-Izquierdo, Raúl Castro Villamor, Miguel A. Ann Med Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for 90-day mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in adult patients transferred by ambulance to an emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19 infection subsequently confirmed by a SARS-CoV-2 test (polymerase chain reaction). We collected epidemiological data, clinical covariates (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, level of consciousness and use of supplemental oxygen) and hospital variables. The primary outcome was cumulative all-cause mortality during a 90-day follow-up, with mortality assessment monitoring time points at 1, 2, 7, 14, 30 and 90 days from ED attendance. Comparison of performances for 90-day mortality between both scores was carried out by univariate analysis. RESULTS: From March to November 2020, we included 2,961 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (median age 79 years, IQR 66–88), with 49.2% females. The qCSI score provided an AUC ranging from 0.769 (1-day mortality) to 0.749 (90-day mortality), whereas AUCs for NEWS ranging from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality. At all-time points studied, differences between both scores were statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with SARS-CoV-2 can rapidly develop bilateral pneumonias with multiorgan disease; in these cases, in which an evacuation by the EMS is required, reliable scores for an early identification of patients with risk of clinical deterioration are critical. The NEWS score provides not only better prognostic results than those offered by qCSI at all the analyzed time points, but it is also better suited for COVID-19 patients. KEY MESSAGES: This work aims to determine whether NEWS is the best score for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19. AUCs for NEWS ranged from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality and were significantly higher than those for qCSI in these same outcomes. NEWS provides a better prognostic capacity than the qCSI score and allows for long-term (90 days) mortality risk assessment of COVID-19 patients. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8881067/ /pubmed/35193439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2042590 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco
Sanz-García, Ancor
Ortega, Guillermo J.
Delgado-Benito, Juan F.
García Villena, Eduardo
Mazas Pérez-Oleaga, Cristina
López-Izquierdo, Raúl
Castro Villamor, Miguel A.
One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title_full One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title_short One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19
title_sort one-on-one comparison between qcsi and news scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with covid-19
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2042590
work_keys_str_mv AT martinrodriguezfrancisco oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT sanzgarciaancor oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT ortegaguillermoj oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT delgadobenitojuanf oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT garciavillenaeduardo oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT mazasperezoleagacristina oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT lopezizquierdoraul oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19
AT castrovillamormiguela oneononecomparisonbetweenqcsiandnewsscoresformortalityriskassessmentinpatientswithcovid19