Cargando…

Two-Year Toxicity and Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centered Study

BACKGROUND: We aimed at determining the safety and feasibility of spot-scanning carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 118 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent treatment with spot-scanning CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ping, Hong, Zhengshan, Li, Yongqiang, Fu, Shen, Zhang, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.808216
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We aimed at determining the safety and feasibility of spot-scanning carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 118 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent treatment with spot-scanning CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) from January 2016 to December 2020. The dose was gradually increased from relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose (D(RBE)) = 59.2–65.6 Gy in 16 fractions. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of acute and late toxicities, while the secondary endpoints were biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 30.2 months (4.8–62.7 months). Acute grade 1 and 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 15.3% and 18.6%, while acute grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 2.5% and 0%, respectively. Late grade 1 and 2 GU toxicities were 4.2% and 1.7%, respectively. No late GI toxicity was observed. Moreover, there were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity (≥ grade 3). No significant association were observed between the factors and the acute GU toxicities, except for clinical target volume (CTV) (p = 0.031) on multivariate analysis. The 2-year bRFS, DMFS, PCSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 2-year outcomes were encouraging, providing additional and useful information on the feasibility and safety of spot-scanning CIRT for treating prostate cancer. Thus, we recommend long-term follow-up and prospective multicentered studies to reinforce the role of CIRT in the management of localized prostate cancer.