Cargando…

REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved for front-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, progressive disease often occurs and subsequent therapies are needed. ICI rechallenge may be an option, but there is a lack of data regarding efficacy and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vauchier, Charles, Auclin, Edouard, Barthélémy, Philippe, Carril-Ajuria, Lucia, Ryckewaert, Thomas, Borchiellini, Delphine, Castel-Ajgal, Zahra, Bennamoun, Mostefa, Campedel, Luca, Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine, Coquan, Elodie, Crouzet, Laurence, Berdah, Jean-François, Chevreau, Christine, Ratta, Raffaele, Fléchon, Aude, Lefort, Felix, Albiges, Laurence, Gross-Goupil, Marine, Vano, Yann-Alexandre, Thibault, Constance, Oudard, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3449660
_version_ 1784659392980844544
author Vauchier, Charles
Auclin, Edouard
Barthélémy, Philippe
Carril-Ajuria, Lucia
Ryckewaert, Thomas
Borchiellini, Delphine
Castel-Ajgal, Zahra
Bennamoun, Mostefa
Campedel, Luca
Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
Coquan, Elodie
Crouzet, Laurence
Berdah, Jean-François
Chevreau, Christine
Ratta, Raffaele
Fléchon, Aude
Lefort, Felix
Albiges, Laurence
Gross-Goupil, Marine
Vano, Yann-Alexandre
Thibault, Constance
Oudard, Stéphane
author_facet Vauchier, Charles
Auclin, Edouard
Barthélémy, Philippe
Carril-Ajuria, Lucia
Ryckewaert, Thomas
Borchiellini, Delphine
Castel-Ajgal, Zahra
Bennamoun, Mostefa
Campedel, Luca
Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
Coquan, Elodie
Crouzet, Laurence
Berdah, Jean-François
Chevreau, Christine
Ratta, Raffaele
Fléchon, Aude
Lefort, Felix
Albiges, Laurence
Gross-Goupil, Marine
Vano, Yann-Alexandre
Thibault, Constance
Oudard, Stéphane
author_sort Vauchier, Charles
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved for front-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, progressive disease often occurs and subsequent therapies are needed. ICI rechallenge may be an option, but there is a lack of data regarding efficacy and prognostic factors. We assessed efficacy of ICI rechallenge and factors associated with better outcomes. Patients and Methods. This ambispective multicenter study included 45 mRCC patients rechallenged with nivolumab ± ipilimumab between 2014 and 2020. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best objective response rate (ORR) for ICI rechallenge (ICI-2). Factors associated with ICI-2 progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: ORR was 51% (n = 23) at first ICI therapy (ICI-1) and 16% (n = 7) for ICI-2. Median PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI, 9.8–23.5) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.8–9.7), and median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 37.8–NR) and 24 months (95% CI, 9.9–NR) for ICI-1 and ICI-2, respectively. Factors associated with poorer ICI-2 PFS were a high number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, use of an intervening treatment between ICI regimens, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score at ICI-2 start. Conversely, ICI-1 PFS >6 months was associated with better ICI-2 PFS. In multivariate analysis, there were only statistical trends toward better ICI-2 PFS in patients with ICI-1 PFS >6 months (p=0.07) and toward poorer ICI-2 PFS in patients who received a treatment between ICI regimens (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Rechallenge with nivolumab-based ICI has some efficacy in mRCC. We identified various prognostic factors in univariate analysis but only statistical trends in multivariate analysis. Our findings bring new evidence on ICI rechallenge and preliminary but unique data that may help clinicians to select patients who will benefit from this strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8881133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88811332022-02-26 REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study Vauchier, Charles Auclin, Edouard Barthélémy, Philippe Carril-Ajuria, Lucia Ryckewaert, Thomas Borchiellini, Delphine Castel-Ajgal, Zahra Bennamoun, Mostefa Campedel, Luca Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine Coquan, Elodie Crouzet, Laurence Berdah, Jean-François Chevreau, Christine Ratta, Raffaele Fléchon, Aude Lefort, Felix Albiges, Laurence Gross-Goupil, Marine Vano, Yann-Alexandre Thibault, Constance Oudard, Stéphane J Oncol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved for front-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, progressive disease often occurs and subsequent therapies are needed. ICI rechallenge may be an option, but there is a lack of data regarding efficacy and prognostic factors. We assessed efficacy of ICI rechallenge and factors associated with better outcomes. Patients and Methods. This ambispective multicenter study included 45 mRCC patients rechallenged with nivolumab ± ipilimumab between 2014 and 2020. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best objective response rate (ORR) for ICI rechallenge (ICI-2). Factors associated with ICI-2 progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: ORR was 51% (n = 23) at first ICI therapy (ICI-1) and 16% (n = 7) for ICI-2. Median PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI, 9.8–23.5) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.8–9.7), and median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 37.8–NR) and 24 months (95% CI, 9.9–NR) for ICI-1 and ICI-2, respectively. Factors associated with poorer ICI-2 PFS were a high number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, use of an intervening treatment between ICI regimens, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score at ICI-2 start. Conversely, ICI-1 PFS >6 months was associated with better ICI-2 PFS. In multivariate analysis, there were only statistical trends toward better ICI-2 PFS in patients with ICI-1 PFS >6 months (p=0.07) and toward poorer ICI-2 PFS in patients who received a treatment between ICI regimens (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Rechallenge with nivolumab-based ICI has some efficacy in mRCC. We identified various prognostic factors in univariate analysis but only statistical trends in multivariate analysis. Our findings bring new evidence on ICI rechallenge and preliminary but unique data that may help clinicians to select patients who will benefit from this strategy. Hindawi 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8881133/ /pubmed/35222642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3449660 Text en Copyright © 2022 Charles Vauchier et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vauchier, Charles
Auclin, Edouard
Barthélémy, Philippe
Carril-Ajuria, Lucia
Ryckewaert, Thomas
Borchiellini, Delphine
Castel-Ajgal, Zahra
Bennamoun, Mostefa
Campedel, Luca
Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
Coquan, Elodie
Crouzet, Laurence
Berdah, Jean-François
Chevreau, Christine
Ratta, Raffaele
Fléchon, Aude
Lefort, Felix
Albiges, Laurence
Gross-Goupil, Marine
Vano, Yann-Alexandre
Thibault, Constance
Oudard, Stéphane
REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title_full REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title_fullStr REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title_short REchallenge of NIVOlumab (RENIVO) or Nivolumab-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ambispective Multicenter Study
title_sort rechallenge of nivolumab (renivo) or nivolumab-ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an ambispective multicenter study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3449660
work_keys_str_mv AT vauchiercharles rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT auclinedouard rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT barthelemyphilippe rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT carrilajurialucia rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT ryckewaertthomas rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT borchiellinidelphine rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT castelajgalzahra rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT bennamounmostefa rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT campedelluca rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT thieryvuilleminantoine rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT coquanelodie rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT crouzetlaurence rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT berdahjeanfrancois rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT chevreauchristine rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT rattaraffaele rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT flechonaude rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT lefortfelix rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT albigeslaurence rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT grossgoupilmarine rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT vanoyannalexandre rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT thibaultconstance rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy
AT oudardstephane rechallengeofnivolumabrenivoornivolumabipilimumabinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaanambispectivemulticenterstudy