Cargando…

Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can be used to assist stent deployment in severe coronary artery calcifications (CAC). METHODS: Studies employing IVL for CAC lesions were included. The primary outcomes included clinical and angiographic success. The secondary outcomes, including lumen ga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattar, Yasar, Almas, Talal, Arshad, Junaid, Zghouzi, Mohamed, Ullah, Waqas, Mir, Tanveer, Mohamed, Mohamed O., Elgendy, Islam Y., Aljaroudi, Wael, Prasad, Anand, Shlofmitz, Richard, Mamas, Mamas A., Kereiakes, Dean J., Chadi Alraies, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100975
_version_ 1784659523185672192
author Sattar, Yasar
Almas, Talal
Arshad, Junaid
Zghouzi, Mohamed
Ullah, Waqas
Mir, Tanveer
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Elgendy, Islam Y.
Aljaroudi, Wael
Prasad, Anand
Shlofmitz, Richard
Mamas, Mamas A.
Kereiakes, Dean J.
Chadi Alraies, M.
author_facet Sattar, Yasar
Almas, Talal
Arshad, Junaid
Zghouzi, Mohamed
Ullah, Waqas
Mir, Tanveer
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Elgendy, Islam Y.
Aljaroudi, Wael
Prasad, Anand
Shlofmitz, Richard
Mamas, Mamas A.
Kereiakes, Dean J.
Chadi Alraies, M.
author_sort Sattar, Yasar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can be used to assist stent deployment in severe coronary artery calcifications (CAC). METHODS: Studies employing IVL for CAC lesions were included. The primary outcomes included clinical and angiographic success. The secondary outcomes, including lumen gain, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium angle at the final angiography site, minimal lumen area site, and minimal stent area site, were analyzed by the random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized mean difference. Tertiary outcomes included safety event ratios. RESULTS: Seven studies (760 patients) were included. The primary outcomes: pooled clinical and angiographic success event ratio parentage of IVL was 94.4% and 94.8%, respectively. On a random effect model for standard inverse variance for secondary outcomes showed: minimal lumen diameter increase with IVL was 4.68 mm (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 1.69–5.32); diameter decrease in the stenotic area after IVL session was −5.23 mm (95 CI –22.6–12.8). At the minimal lumen area (MLA) and final minimal stent area (MSA) sites, mean lumen area gain was 1.42 mm(2) (95% CI 1.06–1.63; p < 0.00001) and 1.34 mm(2) (95% CI 0.71–1.43; p < 0.00001), respectively. IVL reduced calcium thickness at the MLA site (SMD −0.22; 95% CI −0.40–0.04; P = 0.02); calcium angle was not affected at the MLA site. The tertiary outcomes: most common complication was major adverse cardiovascular events (n = 48/669), and least common complication was abrupt closure of the vessel (n = 1/669). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IVL safely and effectively facilitates stent deployment with high angiographic and clinical success rates in treating severely calcified coronary lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8881660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88816602022-03-02 Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis Sattar, Yasar Almas, Talal Arshad, Junaid Zghouzi, Mohamed Ullah, Waqas Mir, Tanveer Mohamed, Mohamed O. Elgendy, Islam Y. Aljaroudi, Wael Prasad, Anand Shlofmitz, Richard Mamas, Mamas A. Kereiakes, Dean J. Chadi Alraies, M. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can be used to assist stent deployment in severe coronary artery calcifications (CAC). METHODS: Studies employing IVL for CAC lesions were included. The primary outcomes included clinical and angiographic success. The secondary outcomes, including lumen gain, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium angle at the final angiography site, minimal lumen area site, and minimal stent area site, were analyzed by the random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized mean difference. Tertiary outcomes included safety event ratios. RESULTS: Seven studies (760 patients) were included. The primary outcomes: pooled clinical and angiographic success event ratio parentage of IVL was 94.4% and 94.8%, respectively. On a random effect model for standard inverse variance for secondary outcomes showed: minimal lumen diameter increase with IVL was 4.68 mm (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 1.69–5.32); diameter decrease in the stenotic area after IVL session was −5.23 mm (95 CI –22.6–12.8). At the minimal lumen area (MLA) and final minimal stent area (MSA) sites, mean lumen area gain was 1.42 mm(2) (95% CI 1.06–1.63; p < 0.00001) and 1.34 mm(2) (95% CI 0.71–1.43; p < 0.00001), respectively. IVL reduced calcium thickness at the MLA site (SMD −0.22; 95% CI −0.40–0.04; P = 0.02); calcium angle was not affected at the MLA site. The tertiary outcomes: most common complication was major adverse cardiovascular events (n = 48/669), and least common complication was abrupt closure of the vessel (n = 1/669). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IVL safely and effectively facilitates stent deployment with high angiographic and clinical success rates in treating severely calcified coronary lesions. Elsevier 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8881660/ /pubmed/35242998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100975 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sattar, Yasar
Almas, Talal
Arshad, Junaid
Zghouzi, Mohamed
Ullah, Waqas
Mir, Tanveer
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Elgendy, Islam Y.
Aljaroudi, Wael
Prasad, Anand
Shlofmitz, Richard
Mamas, Mamas A.
Kereiakes, Dean J.
Chadi Alraies, M.
Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title_full Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title_short Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis
title_sort clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: an updated meta-analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100975
work_keys_str_mv AT sattaryasar clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT almastalal clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT arshadjunaid clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT zghouzimohamed clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT ullahwaqas clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT mirtanveer clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT mohamedmohamedo clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT elgendyislamy clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT aljaroudiwael clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT prasadanand clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT shlofmitzrichard clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT mamasmamasa clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT kereiakesdeanj clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT chadialraiesm clinicalandangiographicsuccessandsafetycomparisonofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyanupdatedmetaanalysis