Cargando…
The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review
PURPOSE: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4 |
_version_ | 1784659545641975808 |
---|---|
author | Brick, Rachelle Padgett, Lynne Jones, Jennifer Wood, Kelley Covington Pergolotti, Mackenzi Marshall, Timothy F. Campbell, Grace Eilers, Rachel Keshavarzi, Sareh Flores, Ann Marie Silver, Julie K. Virani, Aneesha Livinski, Alicia A. Ahmed, Mohammed Faizan Kendig, Tiffany Khalid, Bismah Barnett, Jeremy Borhani, Anita Bernard, Graysen Lyons, Kathleen Doyle |
author_facet | Brick, Rachelle Padgett, Lynne Jones, Jennifer Wood, Kelley Covington Pergolotti, Mackenzi Marshall, Timothy F. Campbell, Grace Eilers, Rachel Keshavarzi, Sareh Flores, Ann Marie Silver, Julie K. Virani, Aneesha Livinski, Alicia A. Ahmed, Mohammed Faizan Kendig, Tiffany Khalid, Bismah Barnett, Jeremy Borhani, Anita Bernard, Graysen Lyons, Kathleen Doyle |
author_sort | Brick, Rachelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service’s Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021. RESULTS: Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8881759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88817592022-02-28 The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review Brick, Rachelle Padgett, Lynne Jones, Jennifer Wood, Kelley Covington Pergolotti, Mackenzi Marshall, Timothy F. Campbell, Grace Eilers, Rachel Keshavarzi, Sareh Flores, Ann Marie Silver, Julie K. Virani, Aneesha Livinski, Alicia A. Ahmed, Mohammed Faizan Kendig, Tiffany Khalid, Bismah Barnett, Jeremy Borhani, Anita Bernard, Graysen Lyons, Kathleen Doyle J Cancer Surviv Review PURPOSE: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service’s Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021. RESULTS: Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4. Springer US 2022-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8881759/ /pubmed/35218521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Brick, Rachelle Padgett, Lynne Jones, Jennifer Wood, Kelley Covington Pergolotti, Mackenzi Marshall, Timothy F. Campbell, Grace Eilers, Rachel Keshavarzi, Sareh Flores, Ann Marie Silver, Julie K. Virani, Aneesha Livinski, Alicia A. Ahmed, Mohammed Faizan Kendig, Tiffany Khalid, Bismah Barnett, Jeremy Borhani, Anita Bernard, Graysen Lyons, Kathleen Doyle The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title | The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title_full | The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title_short | The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
title_sort | influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brickrachelle theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT padgettlynne theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT jonesjennifer theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT woodkelleycovington theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT pergolottimackenzi theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT marshalltimothyf theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT campbellgrace theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT eilersrachel theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT keshavarzisareh theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT floresannmarie theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT silverjuliek theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT viranianeesha theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT livinskialiciaa theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT ahmedmohammedfaizan theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT kendigtiffany theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT khalidbismah theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT barnettjeremy theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT borhanianita theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT bernardgraysen theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT lyonskathleendoyle theinfluenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT brickrachelle influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT padgettlynne influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT jonesjennifer influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT woodkelleycovington influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT pergolottimackenzi influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT marshalltimothyf influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT campbellgrace influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT eilersrachel influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT keshavarzisareh influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT floresannmarie influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT silverjuliek influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT viranianeesha influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT livinskialiciaa influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT ahmedmohammedfaizan influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT kendigtiffany influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT khalidbismah influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT barnettjeremy influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT borhanianita influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT bernardgraysen influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview AT lyonskathleendoyle influenceoftelehealthbasedcancerrehabilitationinterventionsondisabilityasystematicreview |