Cargando…
Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize
BACKGROUND: Genomic selection is a powerful tool in plant breeding. By building a prediction model using a training set with markers and phenotypes, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) can be used as predictions of breeding values in a target set with only genotype data. There is, however, lim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35219296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y |
_version_ | 1784659570203820032 |
---|---|
author | Kaler, Avjinder S. Purcell, Larry C. Beissinger, Timothy Gillman, Jason D. |
author_facet | Kaler, Avjinder S. Purcell, Larry C. Beissinger, Timothy Gillman, Jason D. |
author_sort | Kaler, Avjinder S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic selection is a powerful tool in plant breeding. By building a prediction model using a training set with markers and phenotypes, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) can be used as predictions of breeding values in a target set with only genotype data. There is, however, limited information on how prediction accuracy of genomic prediction can be optimized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of 11 genomic prediction models across species in terms of prediction accuracy for two traits with different heritabilities using several subsets of markers and training population proportions. Species studied were maize (Zea mays, L.), soybean (Glycine max, L.), and rice (Oryza sativa, L.), which vary in linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay rates and have contrasting genetic architectures. RESULTS: Correlations between observed and predicted GEBVs were determined via cross validation for three training-to-testing proportions (90:10, 70:30, and 50:50). Maize, which has the shortest extent of LD, showed the highest prediction accuracy. Amongst all the models tested, Bayes B performed better than or equal to all other models for each trait in all the three crops. Traits with higher broad-sense and narrow-sense heritabilities were associated with higher prediction accuracy. When subsets of markers were selected based on LD, the accuracy was similar to that observed from the complete set of markers. However, prediction accuracies were significantly improved when using a subset of total markers that were significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.10. As expected, exclusion of QTL-associated markers in the model reduced prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy varied among different training population proportions. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that prediction accuracy for genomic selection can be improved by using the Bayes B model with a subset of significant markers and by selecting the training population based on narrow sense heritability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8881851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88818512022-02-28 Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize Kaler, Avjinder S. Purcell, Larry C. Beissinger, Timothy Gillman, Jason D. BMC Plant Biol Research BACKGROUND: Genomic selection is a powerful tool in plant breeding. By building a prediction model using a training set with markers and phenotypes, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) can be used as predictions of breeding values in a target set with only genotype data. There is, however, limited information on how prediction accuracy of genomic prediction can be optimized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of 11 genomic prediction models across species in terms of prediction accuracy for two traits with different heritabilities using several subsets of markers and training population proportions. Species studied were maize (Zea mays, L.), soybean (Glycine max, L.), and rice (Oryza sativa, L.), which vary in linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay rates and have contrasting genetic architectures. RESULTS: Correlations between observed and predicted GEBVs were determined via cross validation for three training-to-testing proportions (90:10, 70:30, and 50:50). Maize, which has the shortest extent of LD, showed the highest prediction accuracy. Amongst all the models tested, Bayes B performed better than or equal to all other models for each trait in all the three crops. Traits with higher broad-sense and narrow-sense heritabilities were associated with higher prediction accuracy. When subsets of markers were selected based on LD, the accuracy was similar to that observed from the complete set of markers. However, prediction accuracies were significantly improved when using a subset of total markers that were significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.10. As expected, exclusion of QTL-associated markers in the model reduced prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy varied among different training population proportions. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that prediction accuracy for genomic selection can be improved by using the Bayes B model with a subset of significant markers and by selecting the training population based on narrow sense heritability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8881851/ /pubmed/35219296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaler, Avjinder S. Purcell, Larry C. Beissinger, Timothy Gillman, Jason D. Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title | Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title_full | Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title_fullStr | Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title_short | Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
title_sort | genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35219296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaleravjinders genomicpredictionmodelsfortraitsdifferinginheritabilityforsoybeanriceandmaize AT purcelllarryc genomicpredictionmodelsfortraitsdifferinginheritabilityforsoybeanriceandmaize AT beissingertimothy genomicpredictionmodelsfortraitsdifferinginheritabilityforsoybeanriceandmaize AT gillmanjasond genomicpredictionmodelsfortraitsdifferinginheritabilityforsoybeanriceandmaize |