Cargando…

Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers

In the feedlot, there can be a decrease in dry matter intake (DMI) associated with reimplanting cattle that negatively affects growth performance. This study was conducted to determine the mechanisms causing a decrease in DMI after reimplanting and identify a strategy to mitigate the decrease. Cross...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmuth, Cory L, Woerner, Dale R, Ballou, Michael A, Manahan, Jeff L, Coppin, Carley M, Long, Nathan S, Hoffman, Ashley A, Young, James Daniel, Smock, Taylor M, Hales, Kristin E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac008
_version_ 1784659655494991872
author Helmuth, Cory L
Woerner, Dale R
Ballou, Michael A
Manahan, Jeff L
Coppin, Carley M
Long, Nathan S
Hoffman, Ashley A
Young, James Daniel
Smock, Taylor M
Hales, Kristin E
author_facet Helmuth, Cory L
Woerner, Dale R
Ballou, Michael A
Manahan, Jeff L
Coppin, Carley M
Long, Nathan S
Hoffman, Ashley A
Young, James Daniel
Smock, Taylor M
Hales, Kristin E
author_sort Helmuth, Cory L
collection PubMed
description In the feedlot, there can be a decrease in dry matter intake (DMI) associated with reimplanting cattle that negatively affects growth performance. This study was conducted to determine the mechanisms causing a decrease in DMI after reimplanting and identify a strategy to mitigate the decrease. Crossbred steers (n = 200; 10 pens/treatment; initial bodyweight [BW] = 386 ± 4.9 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design experiment. Cattle were implanted with Revalor-IS on day 0. Treatments included a Revalor-200 implant on day 90 before feeding with the following management practices imposed: 1) steers were returned to their home pen immediately after reimplant (PCON); 2) steers were placed in pens and restricted from feed and water for 4 h (RES); 3) steers were walked an additional 805 m after reimplant and then returned home (LOC); 4) steers were restricted from feed and water for 4 h and walked an additional 805 m (RES + LOC); 5) steers were given an oral bolus of Megasphaera elsdenii (Lactipro; MS Biotec, Wamego, KS) and were restricted from feed and water for 4 h, and then walked an additional 805 m (LACT). One hundred steers were given an ear tag to record minutes of activity (ESense Flex Tags, Allflex Livestock Intelligence, Madison, WI). As a percentage of BW, DMI was 5% greater (P = 0.01) from reimplant to end for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RES + LOC treatments. Likewise, as a percentage of BW, DMI was 6.6% greater (P = 0.03) from reimplant to end and 4.0% greater (P = 0.05) overall for the PCON treatment vs. the LOC treatment. Overall, DMI as a percentage of BW was 3.3% greater (P = 0.02) for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RES + LOC treatments. There was an increase in G:F from reimplant to end (P = 0.05) for RES + LOC vs. the LACT treatment. From these data, we conclude that restricting cattle from feed and water for 4 h after reimplanting did not alter subsequent DMI. Increasing locomotion had the greatest negative effect on DMI and growth performance. Management strategies to decrease locomotion associated with reimplanting would be beneficial to DMI and overall growth performance of finishing beef steers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8882254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88822542022-02-28 Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers Helmuth, Cory L Woerner, Dale R Ballou, Michael A Manahan, Jeff L Coppin, Carley M Long, Nathan S Hoffman, Ashley A Young, James Daniel Smock, Taylor M Hales, Kristin E Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition In the feedlot, there can be a decrease in dry matter intake (DMI) associated with reimplanting cattle that negatively affects growth performance. This study was conducted to determine the mechanisms causing a decrease in DMI after reimplanting and identify a strategy to mitigate the decrease. Crossbred steers (n = 200; 10 pens/treatment; initial bodyweight [BW] = 386 ± 4.9 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design experiment. Cattle were implanted with Revalor-IS on day 0. Treatments included a Revalor-200 implant on day 90 before feeding with the following management practices imposed: 1) steers were returned to their home pen immediately after reimplant (PCON); 2) steers were placed in pens and restricted from feed and water for 4 h (RES); 3) steers were walked an additional 805 m after reimplant and then returned home (LOC); 4) steers were restricted from feed and water for 4 h and walked an additional 805 m (RES + LOC); 5) steers were given an oral bolus of Megasphaera elsdenii (Lactipro; MS Biotec, Wamego, KS) and were restricted from feed and water for 4 h, and then walked an additional 805 m (LACT). One hundred steers were given an ear tag to record minutes of activity (ESense Flex Tags, Allflex Livestock Intelligence, Madison, WI). As a percentage of BW, DMI was 5% greater (P = 0.01) from reimplant to end for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RES + LOC treatments. Likewise, as a percentage of BW, DMI was 6.6% greater (P = 0.03) from reimplant to end and 4.0% greater (P = 0.05) overall for the PCON treatment vs. the LOC treatment. Overall, DMI as a percentage of BW was 3.3% greater (P = 0.02) for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RES + LOC treatments. There was an increase in G:F from reimplant to end (P = 0.05) for RES + LOC vs. the LACT treatment. From these data, we conclude that restricting cattle from feed and water for 4 h after reimplanting did not alter subsequent DMI. Increasing locomotion had the greatest negative effect on DMI and growth performance. Management strategies to decrease locomotion associated with reimplanting would be beneficial to DMI and overall growth performance of finishing beef steers. Oxford University Press 2022-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8882254/ /pubmed/35233510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac008 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Helmuth, Cory L
Woerner, Dale R
Ballou, Michael A
Manahan, Jeff L
Coppin, Carley M
Long, Nathan S
Hoffman, Ashley A
Young, James Daniel
Smock, Taylor M
Hales, Kristin E
Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title_full Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title_fullStr Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title_full_unstemmed Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title_short Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
title_sort effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac008
work_keys_str_mv AT helmuthcoryl effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT woernerdaler effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT balloumichaela effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT manahanjeffl effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT coppincarleym effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT longnathans effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT hoffmanashleya effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT youngjamesdaniel effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT smocktaylorm effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers
AT haleskristine effectsofphysicalactivityandfeedandwaterrestrictionatreimplantingtimeonfeedintakepatternsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscharacteristicsoffinishingbeefsteers