Cargando…

The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions

AIMS: The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. METHODS: Single and twin pegs were implante...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eckert, Johannes Adrian, Bitsch, Rudi G., Sonntag, Robert, Reiner, Tobias, Schwarze, Martin, Jaeger, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2
_version_ 1784659672922324992
author Eckert, Johannes Adrian
Bitsch, Rudi G.
Sonntag, Robert
Reiner, Tobias
Schwarze, Martin
Jaeger, Sebastian
author_facet Eckert, Johannes Adrian
Bitsch, Rudi G.
Sonntag, Robert
Reiner, Tobias
Schwarze, Martin
Jaeger, Sebastian
author_sort Eckert, Johannes Adrian
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. METHODS: Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system. RESULTS: At the main fixation zone, the twin peg shows less relative movement at 70°/115°. At the transition zone, relative movements are smaller for the single peg for both angles. The single peg shows higher compression at 70° flexion, whereas the twin peg design shows higher compression at 115°. X-displacement is significantly higher for the single peg at 115°. CONCLUSION: Bony defects should be avoided in OUKA. The twin peg shows high resilience against push-out force and should be preferred over the single peg. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):82–90.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8882328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88823282022-03-17 The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions Eckert, Johannes Adrian Bitsch, Rudi G. Sonntag, Robert Reiner, Tobias Schwarze, Martin Jaeger, Sebastian Bone Joint Res Biomechanics AIMS: The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. METHODS: Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system. RESULTS: At the main fixation zone, the twin peg shows less relative movement at 70°/115°. At the transition zone, relative movements are smaller for the single peg for both angles. The single peg shows higher compression at 70° flexion, whereas the twin peg design shows higher compression at 115°. X-displacement is significantly higher for the single peg at 115°. CONCLUSION: Bony defects should be avoided in OUKA. The twin peg shows high resilience against push-out force and should be preferred over the single peg. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):82–90. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8882328/ /pubmed/35124977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Biomechanics
Eckert, Johannes Adrian
Bitsch, Rudi G.
Sonntag, Robert
Reiner, Tobias
Schwarze, Martin
Jaeger, Sebastian
The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title_full The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title_fullStr The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title_full_unstemmed The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title_short The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
title_sort primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions
topic Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT eckertjohannesadrian theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT bitschrudig theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT sonntagrobert theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT reinertobias theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT schwarzemartin theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT jaegersebastian theprimarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT eckertjohannesadrian primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT bitschrudig primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT sonntagrobert primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT reinertobias primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT schwarzemartin primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions
AT jaegersebastian primarystabilityofthefemoralcomponentincementedsingleandtwinpegoxfordunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyunderadverseconditions