Cargando…

The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis

Background: Pelvic incidence (PI) has been described as a parameter that may be a risk factor for lumbar spondylolisthesis (SPL). Studies have reported PI measurement is more precise in CT scans. Very limited studies have measured PI using CT scans to evaluate SPL. We analyzed the reliability of CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Jinhui, Kurra, Swamy, Danaher, Michael, Bailey, Frank, Sullivan, Katherine H, Lavelle, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35237488
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21696
_version_ 1784659676648964096
author Shi, Jinhui
Kurra, Swamy
Danaher, Michael
Bailey, Frank
Sullivan, Katherine H
Lavelle, William
author_facet Shi, Jinhui
Kurra, Swamy
Danaher, Michael
Bailey, Frank
Sullivan, Katherine H
Lavelle, William
author_sort Shi, Jinhui
collection PubMed
description Background: Pelvic incidence (PI) has been described as a parameter that may be a risk factor for lumbar spondylolisthesis (SPL). Studies have reported PI measurement is more precise in CT scans. Very limited studies have measured PI using CT scans to evaluate SPL. We analyzed the reliability of CT scans to measure PI to evaluate SPL and compared it to patients without SPL. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of PI in a consecutive cohort of patients’ pelvic/abdominal CT scans from an emergency room visit at a Level 1 trauma center between 2013 and 2016. Inclusion criteria was >18 years and had no lumbar or pelvis fracture. A total of 361 patients met the criteria for our study. We documented age, average PI, and SPL (type, grading, and location). Sagittal CT scans were used to measure PI (between hip axis to an orthogonal line originating at the center of superior end plate axis of first sacral vertebra). Patients were categorized: with SPL (n=45) and without SPL (n=316). Subgroups were comprised based on the location of SPL (L4/L5 and L5/S1) and type of SPL. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests used; p≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Patients with SPL were significantly older versus patients without SPL, p=0.006. There were no statistical differences in PI between patients with and without SPL (p=0.29); between subgroups of patients with SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.52); between subgroups with type of SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.47); and between SPL patients at L5/S1 and without SPL (p=0.40). Patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 had nearly significant higher PIs (p=0.06) compared to those without SPL or with degenerative SPL at L5/S1. There was a trend towards higher PI in Grade 2 SPL patients at L5/S1, p=0.18. Conclusions: Patients with SPL were significantly older than patients without SPL. The two trends observed were that PI was higher in patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 and an increased PI with Grade 2 isthmic SPL at L5/S1. Our reported CT PI measurements correlated with reported PI measured using standard radiographs in patients with SPL. CT scans may be a reliable modality to evaluate adult SPL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8882350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88823502022-03-01 The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis Shi, Jinhui Kurra, Swamy Danaher, Michael Bailey, Frank Sullivan, Katherine H Lavelle, William Cureus Orthopedics Background: Pelvic incidence (PI) has been described as a parameter that may be a risk factor for lumbar spondylolisthesis (SPL). Studies have reported PI measurement is more precise in CT scans. Very limited studies have measured PI using CT scans to evaluate SPL. We analyzed the reliability of CT scans to measure PI to evaluate SPL and compared it to patients without SPL. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of PI in a consecutive cohort of patients’ pelvic/abdominal CT scans from an emergency room visit at a Level 1 trauma center between 2013 and 2016. Inclusion criteria was >18 years and had no lumbar or pelvis fracture. A total of 361 patients met the criteria for our study. We documented age, average PI, and SPL (type, grading, and location). Sagittal CT scans were used to measure PI (between hip axis to an orthogonal line originating at the center of superior end plate axis of first sacral vertebra). Patients were categorized: with SPL (n=45) and without SPL (n=316). Subgroups were comprised based on the location of SPL (L4/L5 and L5/S1) and type of SPL. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests used; p≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Patients with SPL were significantly older versus patients without SPL, p=0.006. There were no statistical differences in PI between patients with and without SPL (p=0.29); between subgroups of patients with SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.52); between subgroups with type of SPL at L4/L5 and without SPL (p=0.47); and between SPL patients at L5/S1 and without SPL (p=0.40). Patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 had nearly significant higher PIs (p=0.06) compared to those without SPL or with degenerative SPL at L5/S1. There was a trend towards higher PI in Grade 2 SPL patients at L5/S1, p=0.18. Conclusions: Patients with SPL were significantly older than patients without SPL. The two trends observed were that PI was higher in patients with isthmic SPL at L5/S1 and an increased PI with Grade 2 isthmic SPL at L5/S1. Our reported CT PI measurements correlated with reported PI measured using standard radiographs in patients with SPL. CT scans may be a reliable modality to evaluate adult SPL. Cureus 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8882350/ /pubmed/35237488 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21696 Text en Copyright © 2022, Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Shi, Jinhui
Kurra, Swamy
Danaher, Michael
Bailey, Frank
Sullivan, Katherine H
Lavelle, William
The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title_full The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title_fullStr The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title_short The Reliability of CT Scan Measurements of Pelvic Incidence in the Evaluation of Adult Spondylolisthesis
title_sort reliability of ct scan measurements of pelvic incidence in the evaluation of adult spondylolisthesis
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35237488
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21696
work_keys_str_mv AT shijinhui thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT kurraswamy thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT danahermichael thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT baileyfrank thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT sullivankatherineh thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT lavellewilliam thereliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT shijinhui reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT kurraswamy reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT danahermichael reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT baileyfrank reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT sullivankatherineh reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis
AT lavellewilliam reliabilityofctscanmeasurementsofpelvicincidenceintheevaluationofadultspondylolisthesis