Cargando…
Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354 |
_version_ | 1784659691225219072 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Qiyang Liu, Zhengying Lin, Siyi Zhao, Pengjun |
author_facet | Liu, Qiyang Liu, Zhengying Lin, Siyi Zhao, Pengjun |
author_sort | Liu, Qiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures, the impacts of accessibility loss remain underexplored. METHODS: Based on 186 family interviews, a 569-respondent panel survey was designed and distributed monthly from February to October 2020 in Kunming, China. A 3-wave cross-lagged panel model was developed to understand the causal relationship between mental health and perceived accessibility of daily necessities, key services, and social activities. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit indicators imply that the hypothesised model fits the observed data well: χ(2)/df = 2.221, AGFI = 0.910, NFI = 0.907, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.052. The results indicate that perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities had lagged effects on mental health status. The within-wave effects show that perceived accessibility of daily necessities (0.619, p < 0.01) and social activities (0.545, p < 0.01) significantly influenced respondents' mental health during the peak of the pandemic whilst perceived accessibility of social activities dominantly influenced their mental health after restrictions were lifted (0.779, p < 0.01). Perceived accessibility of public services such as healthcare did not significantly influence respondents’ mental health in any wave. COVID-19 containment policies had different mental outcomes across population groups. Disadvantaged people experienced mental health issues due to accessibility loss for daily necessities and social activities until the lifting of compulsory QR-code-for-buses, whilst better-off populations had better mental health during the early phase of the outbreak and rapidly recovered their mental health after mobility restrictions eased. CONCLUSION: Reduced perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities may be an underlying cause of mental health problems. Relative accessibility deprivation exacerbated mental health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8882410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88824102022-02-28 Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies Liu, Qiyang Liu, Zhengying Lin, Siyi Zhao, Pengjun J Transp Health Article BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures, the impacts of accessibility loss remain underexplored. METHODS: Based on 186 family interviews, a 569-respondent panel survey was designed and distributed monthly from February to October 2020 in Kunming, China. A 3-wave cross-lagged panel model was developed to understand the causal relationship between mental health and perceived accessibility of daily necessities, key services, and social activities. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit indicators imply that the hypothesised model fits the observed data well: χ(2)/df = 2.221, AGFI = 0.910, NFI = 0.907, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.052. The results indicate that perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities had lagged effects on mental health status. The within-wave effects show that perceived accessibility of daily necessities (0.619, p < 0.01) and social activities (0.545, p < 0.01) significantly influenced respondents' mental health during the peak of the pandemic whilst perceived accessibility of social activities dominantly influenced their mental health after restrictions were lifted (0.779, p < 0.01). Perceived accessibility of public services such as healthcare did not significantly influence respondents’ mental health in any wave. COVID-19 containment policies had different mental outcomes across population groups. Disadvantaged people experienced mental health issues due to accessibility loss for daily necessities and social activities until the lifting of compulsory QR-code-for-buses, whilst better-off populations had better mental health during the early phase of the outbreak and rapidly recovered their mental health after mobility restrictions eased. CONCLUSION: Reduced perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities may be an underlying cause of mental health problems. Relative accessibility deprivation exacerbated mental health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-06 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8882410/ /pubmed/35251936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Qiyang Liu, Zhengying Lin, Siyi Zhao, Pengjun Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title | Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title_full | Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title_fullStr | Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title_short | Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies |
title_sort | perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of covid-19 containment policies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuqiyang perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies AT liuzhengying perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies AT linsiyi perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies AT zhaopengjun perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies |