Cargando…

Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies

BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qiyang, Liu, Zhengying, Lin, Siyi, Zhao, Pengjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354
_version_ 1784659691225219072
author Liu, Qiyang
Liu, Zhengying
Lin, Siyi
Zhao, Pengjun
author_facet Liu, Qiyang
Liu, Zhengying
Lin, Siyi
Zhao, Pengjun
author_sort Liu, Qiyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures, the impacts of accessibility loss remain underexplored. METHODS: Based on 186 family interviews, a 569-respondent panel survey was designed and distributed monthly from February to October 2020 in Kunming, China. A 3-wave cross-lagged panel model was developed to understand the causal relationship between mental health and perceived accessibility of daily necessities, key services, and social activities. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit indicators imply that the hypothesised model fits the observed data well: χ(2)/df = 2.221, AGFI = 0.910, NFI = 0.907, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.052. The results indicate that perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities had lagged effects on mental health status. The within-wave effects show that perceived accessibility of daily necessities (0.619, p < 0.01) and social activities (0.545, p < 0.01) significantly influenced respondents' mental health during the peak of the pandemic whilst perceived accessibility of social activities dominantly influenced their mental health after restrictions were lifted (0.779, p < 0.01). Perceived accessibility of public services such as healthcare did not significantly influence respondents’ mental health in any wave. COVID-19 containment policies had different mental outcomes across population groups. Disadvantaged people experienced mental health issues due to accessibility loss for daily necessities and social activities until the lifting of compulsory QR-code-for-buses, whilst better-off populations had better mental health during the early phase of the outbreak and rapidly recovered their mental health after mobility restrictions eased. CONCLUSION: Reduced perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities may be an underlying cause of mental health problems. Relative accessibility deprivation exacerbated mental health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8882410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88824102022-02-28 Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies Liu, Qiyang Liu, Zhengying Lin, Siyi Zhao, Pengjun J Transp Health Article BACKGROUND: Individuals have experienced various degrees of accessibility loss during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may consequently have influenced their mental health. Although efforts have been made to understand the mental health consequences of the pandemic and corresponding containment measures, the impacts of accessibility loss remain underexplored. METHODS: Based on 186 family interviews, a 569-respondent panel survey was designed and distributed monthly from February to October 2020 in Kunming, China. A 3-wave cross-lagged panel model was developed to understand the causal relationship between mental health and perceived accessibility of daily necessities, key services, and social activities. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit indicators imply that the hypothesised model fits the observed data well: χ(2)/df = 2.221, AGFI = 0.910, NFI = 0.907, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.052. The results indicate that perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities had lagged effects on mental health status. The within-wave effects show that perceived accessibility of daily necessities (0.619, p < 0.01) and social activities (0.545, p < 0.01) significantly influenced respondents' mental health during the peak of the pandemic whilst perceived accessibility of social activities dominantly influenced their mental health after restrictions were lifted (0.779, p < 0.01). Perceived accessibility of public services such as healthcare did not significantly influence respondents’ mental health in any wave. COVID-19 containment policies had different mental outcomes across population groups. Disadvantaged people experienced mental health issues due to accessibility loss for daily necessities and social activities until the lifting of compulsory QR-code-for-buses, whilst better-off populations had better mental health during the early phase of the outbreak and rapidly recovered their mental health after mobility restrictions eased. CONCLUSION: Reduced perceived accessibility of daily necessities and social activities may be an underlying cause of mental health problems. Relative accessibility deprivation exacerbated mental health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-06 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8882410/ /pubmed/35251936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Qiyang
Liu, Zhengying
Lin, Siyi
Zhao, Pengjun
Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title_full Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title_fullStr Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title_full_unstemmed Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title_short Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies
title_sort perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of covid-19 containment policies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101354
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqiyang perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies
AT liuzhengying perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies
AT linsiyi perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies
AT zhaopengjun perceivedaccessibilityandmentalhealthconsequencesofcovid19containmentpolicies