Cargando…

Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?

PURPOSE: Ideally, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is recorded without noticeable intrusion of mains interference. However, sometimes contamination is difficult to avoid. A post-processing digital notch filter can help to recover the retinal response even in severe cases of mains interferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Heinrich, Sven P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-021-09861-9
_version_ 1784659721449373696
author Heinrich, Sven P.
author_facet Heinrich, Sven P.
author_sort Heinrich, Sven P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ideally, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is recorded without noticeable intrusion of mains interference. However, sometimes contamination is difficult to avoid. A post-processing digital notch filter can help to recover the retinal response even in severe cases of mains interference. While a digital filter can be designed to have little to no impact on peak times, filtering out mains interference also removes the retinal signal content of the same frequency, which may result in a change of amplitude. The present study addressed this issue in the standard first order kernel mfERG. METHODS: In 24 recordings from routine exams with no perceivable mains interference, the effects of 50-Hz and 60-Hz non-causal digital notch filters on amplitude and peak time were assessed. Furthermore, the effect of filtering on contaminated traces was demonstrated and simulated mains interference was used to provide an example of nonlinear superposition of retinal signal and mains interference. RESULTS: mfERG amplitudes were reduced by 0%–15% (median 6%) with the 50-Hz filter and remained virtually unaffected with the 60-Hz filter. Simulations illustrate that spurious high-frequency components can occur in the filtered signal if a strongly contaminated signal is clipped due to a limited input range of the analog-to-digital converter. CONCLUSION: The application of a 50-Hz digital notch filter to mfERG traces causes a mild amplitude reduction which will not normally affect the clinical interpretation of the data. The situation is even more favorable with a 60-Hz digital notch filter. Caution is necessary if the assumption of linear additivity of retinal signal and mains interference is violated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8882573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88825732022-03-02 Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad? Heinrich, Sven P. Doc Ophthalmol Original Research Article PURPOSE: Ideally, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is recorded without noticeable intrusion of mains interference. However, sometimes contamination is difficult to avoid. A post-processing digital notch filter can help to recover the retinal response even in severe cases of mains interference. While a digital filter can be designed to have little to no impact on peak times, filtering out mains interference also removes the retinal signal content of the same frequency, which may result in a change of amplitude. The present study addressed this issue in the standard first order kernel mfERG. METHODS: In 24 recordings from routine exams with no perceivable mains interference, the effects of 50-Hz and 60-Hz non-causal digital notch filters on amplitude and peak time were assessed. Furthermore, the effect of filtering on contaminated traces was demonstrated and simulated mains interference was used to provide an example of nonlinear superposition of retinal signal and mains interference. RESULTS: mfERG amplitudes were reduced by 0%–15% (median 6%) with the 50-Hz filter and remained virtually unaffected with the 60-Hz filter. Simulations illustrate that spurious high-frequency components can occur in the filtered signal if a strongly contaminated signal is clipped due to a limited input range of the analog-to-digital converter. CONCLUSION: The application of a 50-Hz digital notch filter to mfERG traces causes a mild amplitude reduction which will not normally affect the clinical interpretation of the data. The situation is even more favorable with a 60-Hz digital notch filter. Caution is necessary if the assumption of linear additivity of retinal signal and mains interference is violated. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8882573/ /pubmed/34846632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-021-09861-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Heinrich, Sven P.
Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title_full Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title_fullStr Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title_full_unstemmed Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title_short Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
title_sort removing mains interference from the mferg by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-021-09861-9
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichsvenp removingmainsinterferencefromthemfergbyapplyingapostprocessingdigitalnotchfilterforthegoodorthebad