Cargando…

Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to validate the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS), a scale for the evaluation of MG patients in telemedicine. INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has boosted telemedicine in clinical practice. It could be crucial in the care of neurological patients with chronic dise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasqualin, F., Guidoni, S. V., Albertini, E., Ermani, M., Frangiamore, R., Vanoli, F., Antozzi, C., Mantegazza, R., Bonifati, D. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05918-y
_version_ 1784659831479599104
author Pasqualin, F.
Guidoni, S. V.
Albertini, E.
Ermani, M.
Frangiamore, R.
Vanoli, F.
Antozzi, C.
Mantegazza, R.
Bonifati, D. M.
author_facet Pasqualin, F.
Guidoni, S. V.
Albertini, E.
Ermani, M.
Frangiamore, R.
Vanoli, F.
Antozzi, C.
Mantegazza, R.
Bonifati, D. M.
author_sort Pasqualin, F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to validate the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS), a scale for the evaluation of MG patients in telemedicine. INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has boosted telemedicine in clinical practice. It could be crucial in the care of neurological patients with chronic disease. However, there is a lack of validated disease-specific tools to evaluate MG patients in telemedicine. METHODS: The MGTS included ten items divided in four districts: ocular, generalized muscular strength, bulbar, and respiratory. Patients were assessed with two different scales: the MGTS and the INCB-MG chosen as a reference from which MGTS was partially derived. Visit in presence with INCB-MG and televisit with MGTS were performed consecutively. Televisit was conducted by another neurologist between two rooms. A blind method was adopted. The strength of correlation was determined by the correlation coefficient (r); analysis of covariance (ANOVA—Kruskal–Wallis test) was used to compare subgroups. Significance was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were included in the study, 71 females and 60 males. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the INCB-MG scale and the MGTS was 0.825 (p < 0.001), indicating a very strong correlation between them. Different items showed different correlations from low to high (0.32 to 0.80). As expected, correlation was lower between items with different evaluation modality (anamnestic vs clinical). DISCUSSION: The MGTS demonstrated a good correlation with INCB-MG, reliability and construct validity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-05918-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8883006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88830062022-02-28 Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS) Pasqualin, F. Guidoni, S. V. Albertini, E. Ermani, M. Frangiamore, R. Vanoli, F. Antozzi, C. Mantegazza, R. Bonifati, D. M. Neurol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to validate the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS), a scale for the evaluation of MG patients in telemedicine. INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has boosted telemedicine in clinical practice. It could be crucial in the care of neurological patients with chronic disease. However, there is a lack of validated disease-specific tools to evaluate MG patients in telemedicine. METHODS: The MGTS included ten items divided in four districts: ocular, generalized muscular strength, bulbar, and respiratory. Patients were assessed with two different scales: the MGTS and the INCB-MG chosen as a reference from which MGTS was partially derived. Visit in presence with INCB-MG and televisit with MGTS were performed consecutively. Televisit was conducted by another neurologist between two rooms. A blind method was adopted. The strength of correlation was determined by the correlation coefficient (r); analysis of covariance (ANOVA—Kruskal–Wallis test) was used to compare subgroups. Significance was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were included in the study, 71 females and 60 males. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the INCB-MG scale and the MGTS was 0.825 (p < 0.001), indicating a very strong correlation between them. Different items showed different correlations from low to high (0.32 to 0.80). As expected, correlation was lower between items with different evaluation modality (anamnestic vs clinical). DISCUSSION: The MGTS demonstrated a good correlation with INCB-MG, reliability and construct validity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-05918-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8883006/ /pubmed/35226211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05918-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Pasqualin, F.
Guidoni, S. V.
Albertini, E.
Ermani, M.
Frangiamore, R.
Vanoli, F.
Antozzi, C.
Mantegazza, R.
Bonifati, D. M.
Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title_full Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title_short Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS)
title_sort development and validation of the myasthenia gravis telescore (mgts)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05918-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pasqualinf developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT guidonisv developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT albertinie developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT ermanim developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT frangiamorer developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT vanolif developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT antozzic developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT mantegazzar developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts
AT bonifatidm developmentandvalidationofthemyastheniagravistelescoremgts