Cargando…

Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics

PURPOSE: Previous studies show that some visual field (VF) defects are detectable from visual search behavior; for example, when watching video. Here, we developed and tested a VF testing approach that measures the number of fixations to find targets on a background with spatial frequency content si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srinivasan, Rekha, Turpin, Andrew, McKendrick, Allison M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.34
_version_ 1784659855698558976
author Srinivasan, Rekha
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
author_facet Srinivasan, Rekha
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
author_sort Srinivasan, Rekha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Previous studies show that some visual field (VF) defects are detectable from visual search behavior; for example, when watching video. Here, we developed and tested a VF testing approach that measures the number of fixations to find targets on a background with spatial frequency content similar to natural scenes. METHODS: Twenty-one older controls and 20 people with glaucoma participated. Participants searched for a Gabor (6 c/°) that appeared in one of 25 possible locations within a 15° (visual angle) 1/f noise background (RMS contrast: 0.20). Procedure performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity for different combinations of control performance limits (p = 95%, 98%, 99%), number of target locations with fixations outside control performance limits (k = 0 to 25) and number of repeated target presentations (n = 1 to 20). RESULTS: Controls made a median of two to three fixations (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: two to four) to locate the target depending on location. A VF was flagged “abnormal” when the number of fixations was greater than the p = 99% for k = 3 or more locations with n = 2 repeated presentations, giving 85% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. The median test time for controls was 85.71 (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: 66.49–113.53) seconds. CONCLUSION: Our prototype test demonstrated effective and efficient screening of abnormal areas in central vision. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Visual search behavior can be used to detect central vision loss and may produce results that relate well to performance in natural visual environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8883145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88831452022-03-01 Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics Srinivasan, Rekha Turpin, Andrew McKendrick, Allison M. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Previous studies show that some visual field (VF) defects are detectable from visual search behavior; for example, when watching video. Here, we developed and tested a VF testing approach that measures the number of fixations to find targets on a background with spatial frequency content similar to natural scenes. METHODS: Twenty-one older controls and 20 people with glaucoma participated. Participants searched for a Gabor (6 c/°) that appeared in one of 25 possible locations within a 15° (visual angle) 1/f noise background (RMS contrast: 0.20). Procedure performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity for different combinations of control performance limits (p = 95%, 98%, 99%), number of target locations with fixations outside control performance limits (k = 0 to 25) and number of repeated target presentations (n = 1 to 20). RESULTS: Controls made a median of two to three fixations (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: two to four) to locate the target depending on location. A VF was flagged “abnormal” when the number of fixations was greater than the p = 99% for k = 3 or more locations with n = 2 repeated presentations, giving 85% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. The median test time for controls was 85.71 (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: 66.49–113.53) seconds. CONCLUSION: Our prototype test demonstrated effective and efficient screening of abnormal areas in central vision. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Visual search behavior can be used to detect central vision loss and may produce results that relate well to performance in natural visual environments. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8883145/ /pubmed/35195703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.34 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Srinivasan, Rekha
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title_full Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title_fullStr Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title_short Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics
title_sort developing a screening tool for areas of abnormal central vision using visual stimuli with natural scene statistics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.34
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivasanrekha developingascreeningtoolforareasofabnormalcentralvisionusingvisualstimuliwithnaturalscenestatistics
AT turpinandrew developingascreeningtoolforareasofabnormalcentralvisionusingvisualstimuliwithnaturalscenestatistics
AT mckendrickallisonm developingascreeningtoolforareasofabnormalcentralvisionusingvisualstimuliwithnaturalscenestatistics