Cargando…
Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories
If a Gabor pattern drifts in one direction while its internal texture drifts in the orthogonal direction, its perceived position deviates further and further away from its true path. We first evaluated the illusion using manual tracking. Participants followed the Gabor with a stylus on a drawing tab...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.2.16 |
_version_ | 1784659867718385664 |
---|---|
author | 't Hart, Bernard Marius Henriques, Denise Y. P. Cavanagh, Patrick |
author_facet | 't Hart, Bernard Marius Henriques, Denise Y. P. Cavanagh, Patrick |
author_sort | 't Hart, Bernard Marius |
collection | PubMed |
description | If a Gabor pattern drifts in one direction while its internal texture drifts in the orthogonal direction, its perceived position deviates further and further away from its true path. We first evaluated the illusion using manual tracking. Participants followed the Gabor with a stylus on a drawing tablet that coincided optically with the horizontal monitor surface. Their hand and the stylus were not visible during the tracking. The magnitude of the tracking illusion corresponded closely to previous perceptual and pointing measures indicating that manual tracking is a valid measure for the illusion. This allowed us to use it in a second experiment to capture the behavior of the illusion as it eventually degrades and breaks down in single trials. Specifically, the deviation of the Gabor stops accumulating at some point and either stays at a fixed offset or resets toward the veridical position. To report the perceived trajectory of the Gabor, participants drew it after the Gabor was removed from the monitor. Resets were detected and analyzed and their distribution matches neither a temporal nor a spatial limit, but rather a broad gamma distribution over time. This suggests that resets are triggered randomly, about once per 1.3 seconds, possible by extraneous distractions or eye movements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8883172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88831722022-03-01 Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories 't Hart, Bernard Marius Henriques, Denise Y. P. Cavanagh, Patrick J Vis Article If a Gabor pattern drifts in one direction while its internal texture drifts in the orthogonal direction, its perceived position deviates further and further away from its true path. We first evaluated the illusion using manual tracking. Participants followed the Gabor with a stylus on a drawing tablet that coincided optically with the horizontal monitor surface. Their hand and the stylus were not visible during the tracking. The magnitude of the tracking illusion corresponded closely to previous perceptual and pointing measures indicating that manual tracking is a valid measure for the illusion. This allowed us to use it in a second experiment to capture the behavior of the illusion as it eventually degrades and breaks down in single trials. Specifically, the deviation of the Gabor stops accumulating at some point and either stays at a fixed offset or resets toward the veridical position. To report the perceived trajectory of the Gabor, participants drew it after the Gabor was removed from the monitor. Resets were detected and analyzed and their distribution matches neither a temporal nor a spatial limit, but rather a broad gamma distribution over time. This suggests that resets are triggered randomly, about once per 1.3 seconds, possible by extraneous distractions or eye movements. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8883172/ /pubmed/35195671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.2.16 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article 't Hart, Bernard Marius Henriques, Denise Y. P. Cavanagh, Patrick Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title | Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title_full | Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title_fullStr | Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title_short | Measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
title_sort | measuring the double-drift illusion and its resets with hand trajectories |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.2.16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thartbernardmarius measuringthedoubledriftillusionanditsresetswithhandtrajectories AT henriquesdeniseyp measuringthedoubledriftillusionanditsresetswithhandtrajectories AT cavanaghpatrick measuringthedoubledriftillusionanditsresetswithhandtrajectories |