Cargando…
Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived changes of an innovative workplace health promotion intervention and evaluation. In this study, a bottom-up approach was taken to define the central themes and relevant outcomes of an intervention. These central themes and relevant outc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12802-z |
_version_ | 1784659977708765184 |
---|---|
author | van Heijster, Hanneke van Berkel, Jantien Boot, Cécile R. L. Abma, Tineke de Vet, Emely |
author_facet | van Heijster, Hanneke van Berkel, Jantien Boot, Cécile R. L. Abma, Tineke de Vet, Emely |
author_sort | van Heijster, Hanneke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived changes of an innovative workplace health promotion intervention and evaluation. In this study, a bottom-up approach was taken to define the central themes and relevant outcomes of an intervention. These central themes and relevant outcomes of the intervention were defined together with stakeholders, including employees with a low socioeconomic position. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a series of structured stakeholder dialogues in which dilemmas around the – by employees defined —health themes were discussed. The intervention was implemented in a harbor service provider with approximately 400 employees. Over a two-year period, 57 participants engaged in eight dialogues of one hour. 15 interviews and six participant observations took place for the evaluation of the intervention. RESULTS: Together with the stakeholders, high workload and mental health were defined as central themes for the dialogue intervention in the male-dominated workplace. The dialogue intervention contributed to changes, on different levels: individual, team, and organization. Overall, the stakeholder dialogues advanced the understanding of factors contributing to high workload and mental health. In reply to this, several actions were taken on a organizational level. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a bottom-up approach in WHP allows to understand the health issues that are important in the daily reality of employees with a low socioeconomic position. Through this understanding, workplace health promotion can become more suitable and relevant for employees with a low socioeconomic position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NRT): NL8051. Registration date: 28/09/2019, Retrospectively registered https://www.trialregister.nl SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12802-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8883621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88836212022-03-07 Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation van Heijster, Hanneke van Berkel, Jantien Boot, Cécile R. L. Abma, Tineke de Vet, Emely BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived changes of an innovative workplace health promotion intervention and evaluation. In this study, a bottom-up approach was taken to define the central themes and relevant outcomes of an intervention. These central themes and relevant outcomes of the intervention were defined together with stakeholders, including employees with a low socioeconomic position. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a series of structured stakeholder dialogues in which dilemmas around the – by employees defined —health themes were discussed. The intervention was implemented in a harbor service provider with approximately 400 employees. Over a two-year period, 57 participants engaged in eight dialogues of one hour. 15 interviews and six participant observations took place for the evaluation of the intervention. RESULTS: Together with the stakeholders, high workload and mental health were defined as central themes for the dialogue intervention in the male-dominated workplace. The dialogue intervention contributed to changes, on different levels: individual, team, and organization. Overall, the stakeholder dialogues advanced the understanding of factors contributing to high workload and mental health. In reply to this, several actions were taken on a organizational level. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a bottom-up approach in WHP allows to understand the health issues that are important in the daily reality of employees with a low socioeconomic position. Through this understanding, workplace health promotion can become more suitable and relevant for employees with a low socioeconomic position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NRT): NL8051. Registration date: 28/09/2019, Retrospectively registered https://www.trialregister.nl SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12802-z. BioMed Central 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8883621/ /pubmed/35227228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12802-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research van Heijster, Hanneke van Berkel, Jantien Boot, Cécile R. L. Abma, Tineke de Vet, Emely Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title | Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title_full | Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title_short | Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation |
title_sort | stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low sep: a responsive evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12802-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanheijsterhanneke stakeholderdialogueondilemmasatworkasaworkplacehealthpromotioninterventionincludingemployeeswithalowseparesponsiveevaluation AT vanberkeljantien stakeholderdialogueondilemmasatworkasaworkplacehealthpromotioninterventionincludingemployeeswithalowseparesponsiveevaluation AT bootcecilerl stakeholderdialogueondilemmasatworkasaworkplacehealthpromotioninterventionincludingemployeeswithalowseparesponsiveevaluation AT abmatineke stakeholderdialogueondilemmasatworkasaworkplacehealthpromotioninterventionincludingemployeeswithalowseparesponsiveevaluation AT devetemely stakeholderdialogueondilemmasatworkasaworkplacehealthpromotioninterventionincludingemployeeswithalowseparesponsiveevaluation |