Cargando…

The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study

This study attempted to investigate the effect of sandblasting and H(2)O(2) treatments on the microshear bond strength of two commercially available resin cements. A total of 90 cube-shaped specimens of commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) were divided into two groups of Panavia and MHA cements (n = 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakhaei, Mohammadreza, Bozorgmehr, Neda, Rajati Haghi, Hamidreza, Bagheri, Hossein, Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7010018
_version_ 1784660043648466944
author Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Bozorgmehr, Neda
Rajati Haghi, Hamidreza
Bagheri, Hossein
Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul
author_facet Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Bozorgmehr, Neda
Rajati Haghi, Hamidreza
Bagheri, Hossein
Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul
author_sort Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
collection PubMed
description This study attempted to investigate the effect of sandblasting and H(2)O(2) treatments on the microshear bond strength of two commercially available resin cements. A total of 90 cube-shaped specimens of commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) were divided into two groups of Panavia and MHA cements (n = 45). Samples of the Panavia group were randomly divided into three subgroups of 15 samples, including subgroups (no treatment, aluminum oxide sandblasting, and immersion in 35% hydrogen peroxide solution with halogen light). Once the treatment was completed, Panavia V5 was applied on the cp-Ti surface by a Tygon tube. The 45 specimens of the MHA cement group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 15) similarly to the Panavia group. Then, the MHA was applied on the surface of cp-Ti. A universal testing machine was used to measure and examine the microshear bond strength of cement to cp-Ti subsequent to the step of thermocycling. According to results, in the Panavia cement group, the SBS of sandblasting treatment was significantly higher than that of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup (p < 0.05), which displayed a significantly higher SBS than that of the no-treatment subgroup (p < 0.001). In regard to the MHA group, the SBS of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup was significantly lower than that of the sandblasting treatment subgroup (p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences between the SBS of the no treatment and H(2)O(2) treatment subgroups (p = 0.35). Considering the comparison between Panavia and MHA cases, there were no significant differences observed among the no-treatment subgroups (p = 0.34), as well as the sandblasting treatment subgroups (p = 0.67), while the SBS of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup in Panavia cement was higher than that of the H(2)O(2) subgroup in MHA cement (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in both Panavia V5 and MHA cements, sandblasting treatment could improve the bond strength between the titanium surface. However, H(2)O(2) treatment proved to be capable of enhancing the bond strength of Panavia V5 cement without causing any positive effects on the bond strength of MHA cement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8883918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88839182022-03-01 The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Bozorgmehr, Neda Rajati Haghi, Hamidreza Bagheri, Hossein Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul Biomimetics (Basel) Article This study attempted to investigate the effect of sandblasting and H(2)O(2) treatments on the microshear bond strength of two commercially available resin cements. A total of 90 cube-shaped specimens of commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) were divided into two groups of Panavia and MHA cements (n = 45). Samples of the Panavia group were randomly divided into three subgroups of 15 samples, including subgroups (no treatment, aluminum oxide sandblasting, and immersion in 35% hydrogen peroxide solution with halogen light). Once the treatment was completed, Panavia V5 was applied on the cp-Ti surface by a Tygon tube. The 45 specimens of the MHA cement group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 15) similarly to the Panavia group. Then, the MHA was applied on the surface of cp-Ti. A universal testing machine was used to measure and examine the microshear bond strength of cement to cp-Ti subsequent to the step of thermocycling. According to results, in the Panavia cement group, the SBS of sandblasting treatment was significantly higher than that of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup (p < 0.05), which displayed a significantly higher SBS than that of the no-treatment subgroup (p < 0.001). In regard to the MHA group, the SBS of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup was significantly lower than that of the sandblasting treatment subgroup (p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences between the SBS of the no treatment and H(2)O(2) treatment subgroups (p = 0.35). Considering the comparison between Panavia and MHA cases, there were no significant differences observed among the no-treatment subgroups (p = 0.34), as well as the sandblasting treatment subgroups (p = 0.67), while the SBS of the H(2)O(2) treatment subgroup in Panavia cement was higher than that of the H(2)O(2) subgroup in MHA cement (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in both Panavia V5 and MHA cements, sandblasting treatment could improve the bond strength between the titanium surface. However, H(2)O(2) treatment proved to be capable of enhancing the bond strength of Panavia V5 cement without causing any positive effects on the bond strength of MHA cement. MDPI 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8883918/ /pubmed/35225911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7010018 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Bozorgmehr, Neda
Rajati Haghi, Hamidreza
Bagheri, Hossein
Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul
The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of microshear bond strength of resin cements to titanium using different surface treatment methods: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7010018
work_keys_str_mv AT nakhaeimohammadreza theevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT bozorgmehrneda theevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT rajatihaghihamidreza theevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT bagherihossein theevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT rangraziabdolrasoul theevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT nakhaeimohammadreza evaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT bozorgmehrneda evaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT rajatihaghihamidreza evaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT bagherihossein evaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT rangraziabdolrasoul evaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofresincementstotitaniumusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsaninvitrostudy