Cargando…

Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of objective and subjective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prepharmacological and postpharmacological treatment. METHODS: Adults with ADHD (N = 77) completed the Quantified Behavioral Test, self...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Key, Nayra A., Stevenson, Amy, Roy, Perry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33605643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001350
_version_ 1784660104556052480
author Martin-Key, Nayra A.
Stevenson, Amy
Roy, Perry
author_facet Martin-Key, Nayra A.
Stevenson, Amy
Roy, Perry
author_sort Martin-Key, Nayra A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of objective and subjective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prepharmacological and postpharmacological treatment. METHODS: Adults with ADHD (N = 77) completed the Quantified Behavioral Test, self-ratings of ADHD-related symptoms, and quality of life measures pretreatment and posttreatment. RESULTS: The use of objective and subjective measures of ADHD-related symptoms during initiation and follow-up of pharmacological treatment resulted in significant improvements in quality of life after 6 months. Both objective and subjective measures captured changes in ADHD-related symptoms, with more patients showing clinically relevant treatment effects on objective measures. Convergence rates between objective and subjective measures were low to moderate, and improvements on these measures correlated with increased quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Objective and subjective measures of ADHD capture important components of the condition. The findings from this study have important implications for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8884177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88841772022-03-03 Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization Martin-Key, Nayra A. Stevenson, Amy Roy, Perry J Clin Psychopharmacol Original Contributions BACKGROUND: This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of objective and subjective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prepharmacological and postpharmacological treatment. METHODS: Adults with ADHD (N = 77) completed the Quantified Behavioral Test, self-ratings of ADHD-related symptoms, and quality of life measures pretreatment and posttreatment. RESULTS: The use of objective and subjective measures of ADHD-related symptoms during initiation and follow-up of pharmacological treatment resulted in significant improvements in quality of life after 6 months. Both objective and subjective measures captured changes in ADHD-related symptoms, with more patients showing clinically relevant treatment effects on objective measures. Convergence rates between objective and subjective measures were low to moderate, and improvements on these measures correlated with increased quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Objective and subjective measures of ADHD capture important components of the condition. The findings from this study have important implications for clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8884177/ /pubmed/33605643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001350 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Martin-Key, Nayra A.
Stevenson, Amy
Roy, Perry
Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title_full Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title_fullStr Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title_short Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization
title_sort investigating the clinical utility of the combined use of objective and subjective measures of adhd during treatment optimization
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33605643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001350
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkeynayraa investigatingtheclinicalutilityofthecombineduseofobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofadhdduringtreatmentoptimization
AT stevensonamy investigatingtheclinicalutilityofthecombineduseofobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofadhdduringtreatmentoptimization
AT royperry investigatingtheclinicalutilityofthecombineduseofobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofadhdduringtreatmentoptimization