Cargando…

Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication

Endometriosis is a common gynecologic condition that may be visualized on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and mimic lesions of malignancy. We analyzed the interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed in another indication. RESULTS: The PET/CT images of 18 women with know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balogova, Sona, Daraï, Emile, Noskovicova, Lucia, Lukac, Ludovit, Talbot, Jean-Noël, Montravers, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004049
_version_ 1784660104782544896
author Balogova, Sona
Daraï, Emile
Noskovicova, Lucia
Lukac, Ludovit
Talbot, Jean-Noël
Montravers, Françoise
author_facet Balogova, Sona
Daraï, Emile
Noskovicova, Lucia
Lukac, Ludovit
Talbot, Jean-Noël
Montravers, Françoise
author_sort Balogova, Sona
collection PubMed
description Endometriosis is a common gynecologic condition that may be visualized on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and mimic lesions of malignancy. We analyzed the interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed in another indication. RESULTS: The PET/CT images of 18 women with known (n = 15) or suspected (n = 3) endometriosis were analyzed. Based on clinical follow-up and results of other imaging, biopsy, and/or postsurgical histology, the presence of lesions of endometriosis at the time of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was confirmed in 13 of 18 patients (72%). The per-patient positivity rate of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was 8/18 (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22%–69%). The patient-based detection rate of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with confirmed lesions of endometriosis was 8/13 (62%; confidence interval, 32%–86%). On per-lesion/site basis, (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected 11 of 20 sites (55%) of endometriosis. The SUVmax of these lesions/sites ranged between 1.8 and 5.3 (median, 3.8). In 9 of 18 patients (50%), a total of 13 non–endometriosis-related lesions/sites were detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT; their SUVmax ranged between 2.7 and 23 (median, 9.4). CONCLUSION: The interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed in another indication was limited but possible and should be kept in mind, even in postmenopausal women, as the oldest patient with (18)F-FDG–positive endometriosis was aged 63 years. The lesions of endometriosis showed inconstant (18)F-FDG uptake with overlap of SUVmax with low-grade malignancies. In our series, the greatest SUVmax value of lesion of endometriosis was 5.3, somewhat higher than the threshold of 4 previously proposed for identification of malignant transformation of endometriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8884178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88841782022-03-03 Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication Balogova, Sona Daraï, Emile Noskovicova, Lucia Lukac, Ludovit Talbot, Jean-Noël Montravers, Françoise Clin Nucl Med Original Articles Endometriosis is a common gynecologic condition that may be visualized on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and mimic lesions of malignancy. We analyzed the interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed in another indication. RESULTS: The PET/CT images of 18 women with known (n = 15) or suspected (n = 3) endometriosis were analyzed. Based on clinical follow-up and results of other imaging, biopsy, and/or postsurgical histology, the presence of lesions of endometriosis at the time of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was confirmed in 13 of 18 patients (72%). The per-patient positivity rate of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was 8/18 (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22%–69%). The patient-based detection rate of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with confirmed lesions of endometriosis was 8/13 (62%; confidence interval, 32%–86%). On per-lesion/site basis, (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected 11 of 20 sites (55%) of endometriosis. The SUVmax of these lesions/sites ranged between 1.8 and 5.3 (median, 3.8). In 9 of 18 patients (50%), a total of 13 non–endometriosis-related lesions/sites were detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT; their SUVmax ranged between 2.7 and 23 (median, 9.4). CONCLUSION: The interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed in another indication was limited but possible and should be kept in mind, even in postmenopausal women, as the oldest patient with (18)F-FDG–positive endometriosis was aged 63 years. The lesions of endometriosis showed inconstant (18)F-FDG uptake with overlap of SUVmax with low-grade malignancies. In our series, the greatest SUVmax value of lesion of endometriosis was 5.3, somewhat higher than the threshold of 4 previously proposed for identification of malignant transformation of endometriosis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8884178/ /pubmed/35119396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004049 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Balogova, Sona
Daraï, Emile
Noskovicova, Lucia
Lukac, Ludovit
Talbot, Jean-Noël
Montravers, Françoise
Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title_full Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title_fullStr Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title_full_unstemmed Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title_short Interference of Known or Suspected Endometriosis in Reporting FDG PET/CT Performed in Another Indication
title_sort interference of known or suspected endometriosis in reporting fdg pet/ct performed in another indication
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004049
work_keys_str_mv AT balogovasona interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication
AT daraiemile interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication
AT noskovicovalucia interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication
AT lukacludovit interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication
AT talbotjeannoel interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication
AT montraversfrancoise interferenceofknownorsuspectedendometriosisinreportingfdgpetctperformedinanotherindication