Cargando…
Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433 |
_version_ | 1784660159262359552 |
---|---|
author | Vogt, Florian Kurup, Karishma Krishna Mussleman, Paul Habrun, Caroline Crowe, Madeleine Woodward, Alexandra Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna Kaldor, John Vong, Sirenda del Rio Vilas, Victor |
author_facet | Vogt, Florian Kurup, Karishma Krishna Mussleman, Paul Habrun, Caroline Crowe, Madeleine Woodward, Alexandra Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna Kaldor, John Vong, Sirenda del Rio Vilas, Victor |
author_sort | Vogt, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems or conceptual framework for such indicators exists to date. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review using a systematic literature search strategy in the peer-reviewed and grey literature as well as open source online documents. We developed a conceptual framework to map indicators by type (input, process, output, outcome, impact) and thematic area (human resources, financial resources, case investigation, contact identification, contact testing, contact follow up, case isolation, contact quarantine, transmission chain interruption, incidence reduction). RESULTS: We identified a total of 153 contact tracing indicators from 1,555 peer-reviewed studies, 894 studies from grey literature sources, and 15 sources from internet searches. Two-thirds of indicators were process indicators (102; 67%), while 48 (31%) indicators were output indicators. Only three (2%) indicators were input indicators. Indicators covered seven out of ten conceptualized thematic areas, with more than half being related to either case investigation (37; 24%) or contact identification (44; 29%). There were no indicators for the input area “financial resources”, the outcome area “transmission chain interruption”, and the impact area “incidence reduction”. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all identified indicators were either process or output indicators focusing on case investigation, contact identification, case isolation or contact quarantine. We identified important gaps in input, outcome and impact indicators, which constrains evidence-based assessment of contact tracing systems. A universally agreed set of indicators is needed to allow for cross-system comparisons and to improve the performance of contact tracing systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8884491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88844912022-03-01 Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework Vogt, Florian Kurup, Karishma Krishna Mussleman, Paul Habrun, Caroline Crowe, Madeleine Woodward, Alexandra Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna Kaldor, John Vong, Sirenda del Rio Vilas, Victor PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems or conceptual framework for such indicators exists to date. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review using a systematic literature search strategy in the peer-reviewed and grey literature as well as open source online documents. We developed a conceptual framework to map indicators by type (input, process, output, outcome, impact) and thematic area (human resources, financial resources, case investigation, contact identification, contact testing, contact follow up, case isolation, contact quarantine, transmission chain interruption, incidence reduction). RESULTS: We identified a total of 153 contact tracing indicators from 1,555 peer-reviewed studies, 894 studies from grey literature sources, and 15 sources from internet searches. Two-thirds of indicators were process indicators (102; 67%), while 48 (31%) indicators were output indicators. Only three (2%) indicators were input indicators. Indicators covered seven out of ten conceptualized thematic areas, with more than half being related to either case investigation (37; 24%) or contact identification (44; 29%). There were no indicators for the input area “financial resources”, the outcome area “transmission chain interruption”, and the impact area “incidence reduction”. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all identified indicators were either process or output indicators focusing on case investigation, contact identification, case isolation or contact quarantine. We identified important gaps in input, outcome and impact indicators, which constrains evidence-based assessment of contact tracing systems. A universally agreed set of indicators is needed to allow for cross-system comparisons and to improve the performance of contact tracing systems. Public Library of Science 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8884491/ /pubmed/35226699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433 Text en © 2022 Vogt et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vogt, Florian Kurup, Karishma Krishna Mussleman, Paul Habrun, Caroline Crowe, Madeleine Woodward, Alexandra Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna Kaldor, John Vong, Sirenda del Rio Vilas, Victor Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title | Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title_full | Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title_fullStr | Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title_short | Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
title_sort | contact tracing indicators for covid-19: rapid scoping review and conceptual framework |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogtflorian contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT kurupkarishmakrishna contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT musslemanpaul contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT habruncaroline contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT crowemadeleine contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT woodwardalexandra contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT jaramillogutierrezgiovanna contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT kaldorjohn contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT vongsirenda contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework AT delriovilasvictor contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework |