Cargando…

Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework

BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogt, Florian, Kurup, Karishma Krishna, Mussleman, Paul, Habrun, Caroline, Crowe, Madeleine, Woodward, Alexandra, Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna, Kaldor, John, Vong, Sirenda, del Rio Vilas, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433
_version_ 1784660159262359552
author Vogt, Florian
Kurup, Karishma Krishna
Mussleman, Paul
Habrun, Caroline
Crowe, Madeleine
Woodward, Alexandra
Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna
Kaldor, John
Vong, Sirenda
del Rio Vilas, Victor
author_facet Vogt, Florian
Kurup, Karishma Krishna
Mussleman, Paul
Habrun, Caroline
Crowe, Madeleine
Woodward, Alexandra
Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna
Kaldor, John
Vong, Sirenda
del Rio Vilas, Victor
author_sort Vogt, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems or conceptual framework for such indicators exists to date. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review using a systematic literature search strategy in the peer-reviewed and grey literature as well as open source online documents. We developed a conceptual framework to map indicators by type (input, process, output, outcome, impact) and thematic area (human resources, financial resources, case investigation, contact identification, contact testing, contact follow up, case isolation, contact quarantine, transmission chain interruption, incidence reduction). RESULTS: We identified a total of 153 contact tracing indicators from 1,555 peer-reviewed studies, 894 studies from grey literature sources, and 15 sources from internet searches. Two-thirds of indicators were process indicators (102; 67%), while 48 (31%) indicators were output indicators. Only three (2%) indicators were input indicators. Indicators covered seven out of ten conceptualized thematic areas, with more than half being related to either case investigation (37; 24%) or contact identification (44; 29%). There were no indicators for the input area “financial resources”, the outcome area “transmission chain interruption”, and the impact area “incidence reduction”. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all identified indicators were either process or output indicators focusing on case investigation, contact identification, case isolation or contact quarantine. We identified important gaps in input, outcome and impact indicators, which constrains evidence-based assessment of contact tracing systems. A universally agreed set of indicators is needed to allow for cross-system comparisons and to improve the performance of contact tracing systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8884491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88844912022-03-01 Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework Vogt, Florian Kurup, Karishma Krishna Mussleman, Paul Habrun, Caroline Crowe, Madeleine Woodward, Alexandra Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna Kaldor, John Vong, Sirenda del Rio Vilas, Victor PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems or conceptual framework for such indicators exists to date. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review using a systematic literature search strategy in the peer-reviewed and grey literature as well as open source online documents. We developed a conceptual framework to map indicators by type (input, process, output, outcome, impact) and thematic area (human resources, financial resources, case investigation, contact identification, contact testing, contact follow up, case isolation, contact quarantine, transmission chain interruption, incidence reduction). RESULTS: We identified a total of 153 contact tracing indicators from 1,555 peer-reviewed studies, 894 studies from grey literature sources, and 15 sources from internet searches. Two-thirds of indicators were process indicators (102; 67%), while 48 (31%) indicators were output indicators. Only three (2%) indicators were input indicators. Indicators covered seven out of ten conceptualized thematic areas, with more than half being related to either case investigation (37; 24%) or contact identification (44; 29%). There were no indicators for the input area “financial resources”, the outcome area “transmission chain interruption”, and the impact area “incidence reduction”. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all identified indicators were either process or output indicators focusing on case investigation, contact identification, case isolation or contact quarantine. We identified important gaps in input, outcome and impact indicators, which constrains evidence-based assessment of contact tracing systems. A universally agreed set of indicators is needed to allow for cross-system comparisons and to improve the performance of contact tracing systems. Public Library of Science 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8884491/ /pubmed/35226699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433 Text en © 2022 Vogt et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vogt, Florian
Kurup, Karishma Krishna
Mussleman, Paul
Habrun, Caroline
Crowe, Madeleine
Woodward, Alexandra
Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Giovanna
Kaldor, John
Vong, Sirenda
del Rio Vilas, Victor
Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title_full Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title_fullStr Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title_full_unstemmed Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title_short Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
title_sort contact tracing indicators for covid-19: rapid scoping review and conceptual framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433
work_keys_str_mv AT vogtflorian contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT kurupkarishmakrishna contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT musslemanpaul contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT habruncaroline contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT crowemadeleine contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT woodwardalexandra contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT jaramillogutierrezgiovanna contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT kaldorjohn contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT vongsirenda contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT delriovilasvictor contacttracingindicatorsforcovid19rapidscopingreviewandconceptualframework