Cargando…
Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study
PURPOSE: Given limited supplies of vaccines, having information on the costs, and associated health and economic impacts, is important for the development of optimal vaccination strategies. This study explores the epidemiological and economic impact, in terms of the value of lost production, of four...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.142 |
_version_ | 1784660224086376448 |
---|---|
author | Kim, S. Athar, S. LI, Y. Koumarianos, S. Cheng, T. Amiri, L. Avusuglo, W. Woldegerima, W.A. Fall, A.A. John-Baptiste, A. Diener, A. Wu, J. |
author_facet | Kim, S. Athar, S. LI, Y. Koumarianos, S. Cheng, T. Amiri, L. Avusuglo, W. Woldegerima, W.A. Fall, A.A. John-Baptiste, A. Diener, A. Wu, J. |
author_sort | Kim, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Given limited supplies of vaccines, having information on the costs, and associated health and economic impacts, is important for the development of optimal vaccination strategies. This study explores the epidemiological and economic impact, in terms of the value of lost production, of four vaccination strategies – fixed-dose interval (M1), prioritization of the first dose (M2), screen and forego vaccine for those with COVID-19 infection history (M3), and prioritization of the first dose along with screen and forego vaccine for those with COVID-19 infection history(M4), under constraints limiting the daily vaccine supply. METHODS & MATERIALS: Using mathematical and statistical modelling, we quantified the number quarantined, hospitalization days, vaccine doses saved, and deaths averted, and production losses, for each strategy, in comparison to M1. The model parameters and initial conditions were based on Canadian data, and the simulation ran over 365 days starting from June 1, 2021. Sensitivity analyses explored how each strategy changes with different conditions of daily vaccine supply, the initial proportion recovered from COVID-19 infection, and initial coverage of the first dose. RESULTS: Strategy M2 results in a reduction of 67,130,775 doses of vaccine administered, 20 lives saved, and a reduction of $3.8 billion of lost production in comparison to M1. M3 does not save any vaccine dose administered, but results in 5 lives saved, and a reduction of $575,149 in lost production in comparison to strategy M1. Due to the large proportion of the Canadian population who have already received a first vaccine dose, no screening actually occurs under scenario M3 and the daily vaccine supply was used entirely to provide second doses. While M2 is the dominant strategy under the current Canadian setting, sensitivity analyses revealed that M3 dominates when the vaccine supply increased or when the initial recovered proportion from COVID-19 was large enough. CONCLUSION: The findings quantify the potential benefits of alternative vaccination strategies that can save lives and costs. Our study findings can help policymakers identify the optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategy and our study framework can be adapted to other settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8884729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88847292022-03-01 Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study Kim, S. Athar, S. LI, Y. Koumarianos, S. Cheng, T. Amiri, L. Avusuglo, W. Woldegerima, W.A. Fall, A.A. John-Baptiste, A. Diener, A. Wu, J. Int J Infect Dis Op09.03 (832) PURPOSE: Given limited supplies of vaccines, having information on the costs, and associated health and economic impacts, is important for the development of optimal vaccination strategies. This study explores the epidemiological and economic impact, in terms of the value of lost production, of four vaccination strategies – fixed-dose interval (M1), prioritization of the first dose (M2), screen and forego vaccine for those with COVID-19 infection history (M3), and prioritization of the first dose along with screen and forego vaccine for those with COVID-19 infection history(M4), under constraints limiting the daily vaccine supply. METHODS & MATERIALS: Using mathematical and statistical modelling, we quantified the number quarantined, hospitalization days, vaccine doses saved, and deaths averted, and production losses, for each strategy, in comparison to M1. The model parameters and initial conditions were based on Canadian data, and the simulation ran over 365 days starting from June 1, 2021. Sensitivity analyses explored how each strategy changes with different conditions of daily vaccine supply, the initial proportion recovered from COVID-19 infection, and initial coverage of the first dose. RESULTS: Strategy M2 results in a reduction of 67,130,775 doses of vaccine administered, 20 lives saved, and a reduction of $3.8 billion of lost production in comparison to M1. M3 does not save any vaccine dose administered, but results in 5 lives saved, and a reduction of $575,149 in lost production in comparison to strategy M1. Due to the large proportion of the Canadian population who have already received a first vaccine dose, no screening actually occurs under scenario M3 and the daily vaccine supply was used entirely to provide second doses. While M2 is the dominant strategy under the current Canadian setting, sensitivity analyses revealed that M3 dominates when the vaccine supply increased or when the initial recovered proportion from COVID-19 was large enough. CONCLUSION: The findings quantify the potential benefits of alternative vaccination strategies that can save lives and costs. Our study findings can help policymakers identify the optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategy and our study framework can be adapted to other settings. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-03 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8884729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.142 Text en Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Op09.03 (832) Kim, S. Athar, S. LI, Y. Koumarianos, S. Cheng, T. Amiri, L. Avusuglo, W. Woldegerima, W.A. Fall, A.A. John-Baptiste, A. Diener, A. Wu, J. Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title | Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title_full | Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title_short | Assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
title_sort | assessing the epidemiological and economic impact of alternative vaccination strategies: a modeling study |
topic | Op09.03 (832) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kims assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT athars assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT liy assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT koumarianoss assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT chengt assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT amiril assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT avusuglow assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT woldegerimawa assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT fallaa assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT johnbaptistea assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT dienera assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy AT wuj assessingtheepidemiologicalandeconomicimpactofalternativevaccinationstrategiesamodelingstudy |