Cargando…

Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories

PURPOSE: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) never issued guidelines on how states should publicly report COVID-19 deaths, and as a result, states ended up settling on different methods. Critics have claimed that some methods, such as counting “deaths with COVID-19” rather than “...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Q., Rivera, J., Schechtman, K., Glassman, R., Mart, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884774/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.115
_version_ 1784660238353301504
author Nguyen, Q.
Rivera, J.
Schechtman, K.
Glassman, R.
Mart, M.
author_facet Nguyen, Q.
Rivera, J.
Schechtman, K.
Glassman, R.
Mart, M.
author_sort Nguyen, Q.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) never issued guidelines on how states should publicly report COVID-19 deaths, and as a result, states ended up settling on different methods. Critics have claimed that some methods, such as counting “deaths with COVID-19” rather than “deaths from COVID-19”, resulted in overcounts of COVID-19 deaths. While it is clear from alternate measures like excess mortality that all states undercounted COVID-19 deaths, we investigated whether different methods had any effect on state death reporting. METHODS & MATERIALS: We identified the methods states use to report COVID-19 deaths on their dashboards, then compared state-reported data collected by CDC in its COVID Data Tracker against data from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)’s national review of death certificates measuring deaths from COVID-19. Comparing state data against this standardized national dataset allowed us to see if state definitions affected their reporting. RESULTS: Contrary to critics’ claims, few states have definitions that could systematically include individuals who died of causes unrelated to COVID-19. State death definitions instead vary along two lines: whether positive PCR tests were required to count COVID-19 deaths—with states requiring tests having cumulative totals 9.03% lower than NCHS data, while states not requiring them had totals 10.21% higher (p=.06)—and whether states exclusively used death certificates to measure COVID-19 deaths, with these states’ totals coming in 27.63% higher than NCHS data, compared to 3.26% higher for states using additional information (p=.11). CONCLUSION: Rather than certain methods leading to systematic overcounts of COVID-19 deaths, it appears some methods could be especially prone to undercounts. Only states using death certificate reviews had counts substantially higher than NCHS data, and since NCHS also uses death certificates, the difference appears to be a matter of the faster speed of state review. Meanwhile, many states using different methods have discovered they missed large quantities of COVID-19 deaths in their counts. The CDC should have provided leadership to states on how they should report COVID-19 deaths to avoid any preventable undercounts, and public communication to quell misinformation about overcounts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8884774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88847742022-03-01 Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories Nguyen, Q. Rivera, J. Schechtman, K. Glassman, R. Mart, M. Int J Infect Dis Topic 06: COVID-19 Ethics and Misinformation OP06.01 (216) PURPOSE: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) never issued guidelines on how states should publicly report COVID-19 deaths, and as a result, states ended up settling on different methods. Critics have claimed that some methods, such as counting “deaths with COVID-19” rather than “deaths from COVID-19”, resulted in overcounts of COVID-19 deaths. While it is clear from alternate measures like excess mortality that all states undercounted COVID-19 deaths, we investigated whether different methods had any effect on state death reporting. METHODS & MATERIALS: We identified the methods states use to report COVID-19 deaths on their dashboards, then compared state-reported data collected by CDC in its COVID Data Tracker against data from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)’s national review of death certificates measuring deaths from COVID-19. Comparing state data against this standardized national dataset allowed us to see if state definitions affected their reporting. RESULTS: Contrary to critics’ claims, few states have definitions that could systematically include individuals who died of causes unrelated to COVID-19. State death definitions instead vary along two lines: whether positive PCR tests were required to count COVID-19 deaths—with states requiring tests having cumulative totals 9.03% lower than NCHS data, while states not requiring them had totals 10.21% higher (p=.06)—and whether states exclusively used death certificates to measure COVID-19 deaths, with these states’ totals coming in 27.63% higher than NCHS data, compared to 3.26% higher for states using additional information (p=.11). CONCLUSION: Rather than certain methods leading to systematic overcounts of COVID-19 deaths, it appears some methods could be especially prone to undercounts. Only states using death certificate reviews had counts substantially higher than NCHS data, and since NCHS also uses death certificates, the difference appears to be a matter of the faster speed of state review. Meanwhile, many states using different methods have discovered they missed large quantities of COVID-19 deaths in their counts. The CDC should have provided leadership to states on how they should report COVID-19 deaths to avoid any preventable undercounts, and public communication to quell misinformation about overcounts. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-03 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8884774/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.115 Text en Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Topic 06: COVID-19 Ethics and Misinformation OP06.01 (216)
Nguyen, Q.
Rivera, J.
Schechtman, K.
Glassman, R.
Mart, M.
Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title_full Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title_fullStr Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title_full_unstemmed Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title_short Methods for Counting COVID-19 Deaths in US States and Territories
title_sort methods for counting covid-19 deaths in us states and territories
topic Topic 06: COVID-19 Ethics and Misinformation OP06.01 (216)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884774/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.115
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenq methodsforcountingcovid19deathsinusstatesandterritories
AT riveraj methodsforcountingcovid19deathsinusstatesandterritories
AT schechtmank methodsforcountingcovid19deathsinusstatesandterritories
AT glassmanr methodsforcountingcovid19deathsinusstatesandterritories
AT martm methodsforcountingcovid19deathsinusstatesandterritories